Laserfiche WebLink
LEXINGTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE MINUTES November 24, 1975 Page 222 <br /> A regular meeting of the Lexington School Committee came to order at <br /> 8:05 p.m. at Jonas Clarke Junior High School. Present were Mesdames Swanson <br /> and Berchtold. Messrs. Rotberg, Wadsworth. Also present were Messrs. Spiris . <br /> and Monderer, and Miss Quinn. <br /> The entire meeting was devoted to a discussion of the testing program <br /> currently in use in the Lexington Public Schools. Invited to offer their <br /> perceptions of the program were Dr. Fritz Mosher of the Carnegie Corporation; <br /> Mrs. Helen Grush, a Lexington resident and former testing committee member; <br /> and Dr. Bernard Harleston, a Lexington resident who served four years on the <br /> Graduate Records Examination Board. <br /> Dr. Monderer opened the meeting. He noted that the testing program has <br /> these major characteristics: it uses a standardized, norm-referenced, group <br /> administered test to measure general achievement of pupils` basic skills each <br /> year from grades 2 through 8; in addition, a measure of aptitude for learning <br /> is used in grades 2 and 4. <br /> Dr. Monderer continued with a description of other evaluations used as <br /> a child progresses through the grades. These include kindergarten screening, <br /> placement tests and level tests in the elementary grades, and specially re- <br /> quested supplemental evaluations when a specific area of concern is noted. <br /> Dr. Monderer continued his presentation, reading a statement of the goals <br /> of the testing program as set forth by the Testing Committee in their 1974 <br /> report: <br /> 1. To identify periodically pupil strengths and weaknesses in terms of <br /> skill development in relation to self and peers <br /> 2. To provide meaningful test information that is easy for teachers to <br /> interpret. <br /> 3. To assist the teacher with methods of applying test data to improve <br /> the instructional process <br /> 4. To determine a child's basic learning potential <br /> 5. To identify children with special needs <br /> 6. To provide school administrators and the community at large with an <br /> index of pupil achievement <br /> Dr. Monderer closed by admitting that there are many concerns, both local <br /> and nationwide, about the whole concept of testing. While many decry the over- <br /> use of testing, still others demand accountability and measurement; this evenings ' <br /> meeting is an attempt to address that dilemma. <br /> Dr. Monderer then read a statement from Dr. Celia Schulhoff, a Lexington <br /> school psychologist, who was unable to be present for the meeting. Dr. Schulhoff <br /> confined her remarks to the area of IQ testing. She noted the complexity of the <br /> whole concept of "intelligence", the nature of IQ tests in general, and some <br /> major uses of IQ tests. <br /> Dr. Schulhoff then noted some abuses of IQ tests. Among these are: <br /> 1. treating an IQ score as if it were a fixed unchangeable trait <br /> 2. ignoring relevant factors which affect IQ scores, and <br /> 3. expecting definite levels of achievement in specific areas of the <br /> curriculum based on IQ scores. <br />