Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Public Schools <br /> Lexington, Massachusetts November, 1975 <br /> Memo to: Mr. M. Spirts <br /> From Dr. J. Monderer <br /> Re. High School Guidance Program <br /> Last Spring, the Committee to Study the Lexington High School Guidance Program <br /> made its report to the School Committee. It concluded that parents and students <br /> did not believe thereis failure or severe malfunctioning in specific areas of <br /> the guidance program. There is no deep-seated dissatisfaction on the part of most <br /> parents and students. There is need, the committee felt, for better definition of <br /> the guidance program, better integration of guidance with other resources, possibly <br /> more specialization of counselors, and more centralization of guidance resources, <br /> more professional development, evaluation of guidance staff, and to provide extra <br /> communications. <br /> This Fall, the counselors, Director of Guidance, high school principal, assis- <br /> tant principal, and Director of Pupil Personnel Services have met to consider a <br /> response to this report and to indicate what has and might be done in directions <br /> suggested by it. This is, then, a progress report. As the study committee sug- <br /> gested - "the guidance program success or failure is a function of many professionals <br /> outside the guidance area, mainly the teachers and administrators at the high school <br /> ...." For this reason, it is important to deal with guidance program issues in <br /> relation to a total school plan. Any reorganization of guidance programs and ser- <br /> vices should be considered in relation to any high school reorganization plan. <br /> Then the plan for guidance will be harmonized and integrated with other aspects of <br /> ( the school and will have the backing and support of its major school administrator - <br /> the principal. That support is essential for its success. There has been too <br /> little time for adequate dialogue among us all to develop a unified view of solutions <br /> for improvement. <br /> We have been able to agree on the major goal statements which follow: <br /> MAJOR GOALS <br /> The overall responsibility of the guidance program atthe high school is to <br /> assist each student to maximize his potential in the areas of educational,vocational <br /> and personal development. Within this responsibility should fall these major goals: <br /> 1. To assist students to improve personal social relationships, opportunities <br /> and expectancies that affect their educational and vocational progress. <br /> 2. To assist students to formulate educational, career and personal goals <br /> and plans. <br /> 3. To assist students to use resources and services within or without the <br /> school to reduce obstacles to, and further their development. <br /> 4. To assist staff, parents, and community to more effectively carry out their <br /> responsibilities for enhancing students' development in educational, social and <br /> career domains. <br /> These are priority goals with which the high school administration, the Guidance <br /> - and Counseling Department and the Director of Pupil Personnel Services can now agree. <br />