Laserfiche WebLink
November 3, 1975 <br /> Page 213 <br /> Multi-Handicapped (Burlington) <br /> October 31, 1975 Classified Payroll #4 216.00 SCHEDULE OF <br /> PAYMENTS <br /> Pre-School Program (Burlington) (CONTINUED) <br /> October 31, 1975 Classified Payroll #3 432.00 <br /> Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools it was NEW <br /> PERSONNEL <br /> VOTED: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools it was TUITION <br /> RATES <br /> VOTED: to establish the following tuition rates for the Lexington 1975-1976 <br /> Public Schools for 1975-1976. (Brown,Wadsworth, Unanimous) REGULAR & <br /> SPECIAL <br /> Senior High School $1,540 CLASSES <br /> Junior High School 1,476 <br /> Elementary 1,259 <br /> Special Education 6,835 <br /> Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools it was FOOTBALL <br /> EQUIPMENT <br /> VOTED: to award the bid for football reconditioning to Paul Dunne, Inc. RECONDITIONING <br /> and Phil Murray, Inc. , as the low bidders meeting specifications. (BIDS) <br /> (Brown, Wadsworth, Unanimous) <br /> Phil Murray Co. , Inc. Unit. Price Total Price <br /> Helmets, Reconditioning, Cleaning & Sterilize $2.95 $590.00 <br /> Specific replacement parts-17 items .05 to $9.00 777.80 <br /> Paul Dunne, Inc. <br /> Shoulder pads clean & sterilize 2.70 472.50 <br /> Thigh Guards - clean .10 20.00 <br /> Knee pads-clean .10 20.00 <br /> -Girdle inserts-clean .10 20.00 <br /> Hand, forearm & Elbow guards-clean NC <br /> Mr. James Lape, Head of the English Department at Lexington High DISCUSSION OF <br /> School, and Nancy Ridill, Chairman of the same department at Clarke ENGLISH <br /> Junior High School, appeared before the Committee to briefly explain SYLLABUS <br /> the origin and purpose of a revised syllabus for the junior high. <br /> The Committee reacted favorably to the general outline. A dis- <br /> cussion was held on the general outline rather than on specific parts <br /> of the syllabus. <br /> Mr. Lape pointed out that the revision was the product of continuous <br /> staff sessions in the junior high schools over the past few years and <br /> reflected the feeling of teachers that the 1965 Goals and Sequences doc- <br /> ument was not as usable as it should be and in need of updating. <br />