Laserfiche WebLink
Page 211 <br /> November 3, 1975 <br /> A regular meeting of the Lexington School Committee came to order <br /> at 8:00 p.m. at the School Administration Building. Present were <br /> Mesdames Berchtold, Swanson; Messrs. Brown, Rotberg, Wachman and Wads- <br /> worth. Also present were Ms. Quinn, Messrs. Barnes, Maclnnes, Dr. <br /> Monderer, Mr. Spiris and Mrs. Cummings. <br /> Mr. Frank Sarno said he was looking forward to participating in the PUBLIC <br /> Ch 766 Workshop which will be held on November 10. Mrs. Swanson noted PARTICIPATION <br /> that all teachers are planning to attend. It is unclear at this time <br /> how the programs will be presented. Hopefully, in the future, programs <br /> will be scheduled for Thursday afternoons. Mr. Sarno replied that <br /> Thursday afternoons have been set aside for pupil assistance and adding <br /> to this schedule might create an additional burden. <br /> Louise Rankin, Dorothy Dooley and Jacqueline Ward made brief com- <br /> ments in support of the Ch 766 Workshop. <br /> Kay Dugdale commented on the Outdoors as Teachers Program (OATS) <br /> which was discussed at two previous meetings. Mrs. Dugdale felt that <br /> a program such as OATS should have School Committee approval. She asked <br /> the Committee to follow Alan Wachman's suggestion and establish clear <br /> guidelines for programs such as this one. <br /> Mr. Sarno asked Mr. Rotberg to clarify his comment, made at a pre- <br /> vious meeting, about the junior high schools being a weak link in the <br /> educational chain. Mr. Rotberg replied with the following statement: <br /> "Criticism of the "weak link" statement may have been taken out of con- <br /> text. The immediate context was support for an innovative program at <br /> Diamond Junior High School. The broader context was and is the immense <br /> problem of educating junior high school children nationally. <br /> 'It is an unfortunate grouping together of children who are having <br /> normal, but new problems of personal, as well as educational transition. <br /> What to do about these years is accepted as an educational problem <br /> nationally. <br /> 'Despite the stress of these junior high years, school systems through- <br /> out the nation typically devote proportionally fewer resources and atten- <br /> tion to the junior high school level. The personnel of junior highs may <br /> be as dedicated everywhere as they are in Lexington. Yet, they usually <br /> have to make do with fewer resources than those devoted to elementary <br /> and senior high education. In this sense--but not in terms of the quality <br /> on the effort of teachers--junior high schools everywhere may be considered <br /> a "weak link". It is possible that the junior highs are doing more for <br /> children but are recognized too little because these years, emotionally <br /> and educationally, are especially difficult ones. I am arguing that we <br /> should devote more attention to, and provide more resources for junior <br /> high school education." <br />