1975-02-03-SC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Page 33 February 3, 1975 In the discussion of special needs, Dr. Monderer noted that it had been projected that during 74-75 approximately 500 core evaluations would be accomplished. As of 2/1/75 499 have been referred. He also noted that the high school screening program indicates 500-1100 students may need some assistance. His point was that the anticipated 502 additional students for special needs services next year is a conservative estimate. Mrs. Swanson applauded the efforts of the screening program at the high school and noted that for 13 years the LACLD has been investigating this area. Dr. Guldager also acknowledged the help and cooperation of that group. Mrs. David Hamlin, teacher-coordinator of the Alternative Education Program outlined the student selection procedures, program offerings and goals. He mentioned that problems in the student selection are solved since they now are evaluated before selection by the Core Evaluation Team. He reported on a proposal to obtain funds from the State Department of Education for additional services for this program. Mrs. Berchtold asked if we are receiving any services from Mystic Valley. Dr. Guldager responded affirmatively saying a federal grant will allow the Center to supply consultant services to the Lexington Public Schools. Several towns will be able to use the Mental Health Center on a variety of levels. The committe reviewed the information presented by the Superintendent regarding the assessment of needs and recommendations for the future direction of the Lexington Metco program. This item was placed on the agenda 2/10/75. A list of school committee meetings through February 18 was announced. SCHOOL The newspapers and school information phone will announce the dates, agenda, COMMITTEE time etc. DATA Mrs. Berchtold reviewed the suggested establishment of Citizens Study , Sub Committees as follows: SCHOOL BUILDING 1. The reconvened Enrollment Projection Sub-Committee SUB-COMM. 2. A subcommittee to undertake further development of cost implications 3. A subcommittee to study the reassignment of pupils as it relates to redistricting, district potential growth, distances from school. Mrs. Davison presented a proposal for a fourth subcommittee. Her outline contained 19 suggested points that such a committee might consider. It would be a broadly based advisory committee to study the education programs now being offered in the schools. This vehicle would offer people an opportunity to explain their school programs and get people together to hear each other. Mrs. Berchtold stated she felt the present 3 subcommittees, letters received, public meetings of t'he pas: and those scheduled in April provide a great deal of information. Mrs. SY.ansm felt that to say buildings were being closed because rhev were old or that programs were of lower quality was erroneous. Enrollment