Laserfiche WebLink
Page 23 <br /> January 27, 1975 <br /> The school committee received a report from the CH 622 Committee <br /> entitled ":Sex Inegnality'in. Lexington Schools 1973-1974". Those who CH 622 REPORT <br /> worked on the committee were: Jane Crawford, Philip Crosby, Liz Haines, <br /> Georgia Glick, Patricia Hadley, Ethel Heins, Sheila Clemon Karp, <br /> Ellen H. Karin, Paul Lombard, Daniel Moegelin, Dorothy O'Connor and <br /> Athena Theodore. <br /> Mrs. Berchtold summarized the reasons the committee was formed <br /> in March and the information it was asked to include in the report. She <br /> gave a vote of thanks to Diane Lund who inspired the charge initially and <br /> added the report was quite thorough and offered a number of concrete <br /> suggestions. - <br /> Chairman Elizabeth Haines was introduced and proceeded to review the <br /> contents which covered 51 pages. Specific findings - Despite sporadic <br /> efforts to confront the problem of sex discrimination and sexism in the <br /> town's schools, there has been no system wide attempt to change those <br /> existing policies and practices which affect the educational experiences • <br /> and opportunities of girls and boys, either through administrative efforts <br /> or through administrative efforts or through Continuing Curriculum Committees. <br /> In addition, although Lexington has extensive computer service and other <br /> resources to assist in providing information and defining dimensions of the <br /> problems concerning differential treatment of girls and to ys, data are not <br /> collected in any systematic way according to the sex distribution of the students, <br /> nor are supplemental tables by sex of students attached to the school budget. <br /> Mrs, Haines continued to discuss sex imbalances in the professional staff, <br /> sports, practical arts programs, high school curriculum, non athletic curricular <br /> activities, etc. She described the difference between girls and boys with respect <br /> to the educational services and treatment they receive in the Lexington school <br /> system. The recommendation of the committee was to select a continuing <br /> advisory committee (by the school committee) to develop an Affirmative Action <br /> Plan, make revisions whenever necessary, and monitor its implementation <br /> according to available guidelines provided by state and federal agencies and in <br /> cooperation with the advisory councils designated by the state's Department of <br /> Education to help schools implement Ch 622. Regarding the establishment of <br /> such a committee, other suggestions to consider would be for representatives <br /> on a rotating basis from among teachers, administrators, students and community <br /> groups, a budget to cover expenses, a feeling of independence, use of the <br /> computer and personnel resources. The advisory committee should continue <br /> indefinitely until mutual agreement is reached with the school committee that its <br /> work has been accomplished. <br /> Specific recommendations were then discussed covering sex discrimination laws,. <br /> data, in-service training, summer workshops, staff, extra curricula sports, <br /> physical education, etc. <br />