Laserfiche WebLink
Page 13 <br /> January 13, 1975 <br /> Also attached to the budget package were requests for the per pupil allocation <br /> it 19 accounts totaling approximately 380K (22% of the Expense Budget). <br /> Dr. Fobert reviewed the budget for the school committee and the audience. <br /> A general discussion followed. <br /> Dr. Fobert briefly described the EDCO Annex Program which is no EDCO ANNEX <br /> longer operating because of a lack of funds. The participants were eighth PROGRAM <br /> graders from Diamond Jr. High School and Joseph Barnes Jr. High School <br /> in East Boston. Application for funds to continue the program has been <br /> made to the State Department of Education under Ch 636. The School <br /> Committee was asked to cast its vote to allow Lexington students to take <br /> part in the program if funds are provided. After reviewing the information, <br /> it was <br /> VOTED: That it is the intention of the Lexington School Committee to permit <br /> participation of Lexington students in the EDCO Annex Program if funds <br /> are available (Wadsworth, Davison, Unanimous) <br /> Mrs. Berchtold read a letter from Mrs. Patricia Hadley of the PTA Council <br /> stating that A motion was made as follows: "To convey to the School Committee <br /> the strong sense of the PTA Council that opportunities for busing be equalized <br /> for secondary students living 1 1/2-2 miles from school, that the burden for PTA COUNCIL <br /> 'lancing such busing be removed from parents, and that the initial one year <br /> expenditure for additional buses be an added item on the school committee budget <br /> and not be at the expense of the educati onal program." <br /> Mrs. Berchtold read a letter from the Board of Selectmen asking the School <br /> Committee to appoint a representative to sit on the Recreation Study Committee. <br /> No action was taken on the request this evening. RECREATION <br /> STUDY COMM. I <br /> Mrs. Swanson told the committee that she had sought the advice of <br /> Mr. Richard Miller, the consultant recommended by Mr. Rotberg, relative <br /> to preparing the proposal for the management study. Because Mr. Miller <br /> expressed an interest in bidding on the study, Mrs. Swanson did not look <br /> for further information from him. The committee's impression was that <br /> Mr. Miller had no interest in placing a bid. Mr. Wadsworth suggested that we <br /> place an advertisement in the newspaper inviting those interested parties to <br /> bid on the job. The possibility of selecting one or two firms to bid as opposed <br /> to inviting open bids was discussed. Dr. Fobert questioned the legality of this <br /> move and said he would consult with the town counsel and report back to the <br /> committee. Mrs. Davison made a MOTION, which failed, to do a compre- <br /> hensive study similar to that described in the letter from Douglas Beaven of <br /> Booz-Allen-Hamilton. MANAGEMENT <br /> STUDY <br /> After further discussion, it was <br /> VOTED: To send the draft proposal of Mrs. Swanson and Mr. Wadsworth to al <br /> list of consultants which will be provided by Dr. Fobert. The cover <br /> letter will be written by Mrs. Swanson. (Wadsworth, Davison, Unanimous) <br />