Laserfiche WebLink
go back to cement instead of brick pavers. Mr. Livsey responded that the design is only <br /> at 25% completion and that the design most likely will not change to go back to cement. <br /> Right now the sidewalk ramps are the only items being discussed to be manufactured <br /> out of cement. (Mr. Pato confirmed that the Board of Selectmen voted in favor of <br /> replacing brick with brick and are not likely to revisit the issue.) Mr. Livsey explained <br /> that the Town is waiting for a sample of the cement ramp from the manufacturer to <br /> demonstrate to people how it works and what it looks like. The ramp sample takes 8 <br /> weeks to produce. Ms. Manz asked about the justification for the bricks to be <br /> considered historic. Mr. Livsey explained that the streetscape design from 1966 has <br /> been deemed historically significant, citing a report from PAL, and the bricks are an <br /> integral part of the finding of significance. Ms. Fenollosa stated that while brick <br /> sidewalks are not always part of Mid Century Modern design, nevertheless brick was <br /> selected as the sidewalk material of choice for Lexington's streetscape and thus the <br /> sidewalks have significance in their own right as an important element of the 1966 <br /> design. Mr. Pressman asked about illuminating pedestrian sidewalks and if the project <br /> goes according to schedule, when would the new street lights be functional. Mr. Livsey <br /> explained that the streetlights are expected to be placed sometime within the years <br /> 2020-2022 and that they are one of the last things to be addressed because the work is <br /> contingent on the underground work being completed first. The plan is to keep the <br /> design of the lights similar to what is currently in use. Mr. Livsey explained that you can <br /> light more if you go higher but to keep within the historic design the poles are going to <br /> be the same height as what is currently in place but the new lights will provide better <br /> illumination. Mr. Hornig asked about the eligibility of the granite curbing for CPA <br /> funding. Mr. Livsey explained that the granite curbing is eligible because it has been part <br /> of the streetscape since design 1966. Mr. Wolk inquired about the project's time frame. <br /> Mr. Livsey stated that 75% of the design will be completed by March and 100% of the <br /> design will be completed by next winter.The next step is to send the project out to bid <br /> and then 2 construction seasons will be required to fully complete the project. Mr. <br /> Horton asked about the opinions and views of the Commission on Disability regarding <br /> the accessibility of a brick center streetscape. Mr. Livsey explained that Commission on <br /> Disability's concern regarding accessibility is related to the roughness of a brick. The <br /> rougher the brick the less accessible it is. There is one company in the United States that <br /> produces wire cut brick pavers with the lowest amount of roughness. In a comparison <br /> study good condition cement and good condition wire cut brick pavers have similar <br /> roughness. Traditional brick pavers like Boston pavers are not compliant with ADA <br /> standards. The wire cut brick will also be laid in a herringbone pattern which is proven <br /> to be the smoothest way to lay brick. <br /> It was the general consensus that the project is a good project, but some members felt <br /> the funding request may not be appropriate for CPA funding, i.e. it seems like a public <br /> works project that should be funded out of the tax levy, not CPA funds. Mr. Pato <br /> 2 <br />