Laserfiche WebLink
LEARY PROPERTY COMMUNITY HOUSING TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT <br /> MAY 25, 2011 <br /> COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT <br /> Over a period of months the Task Force met some sixteen times and heard numerous presentations <br /> by developers and others, and came to the conclusion that multiple units were the best solution to meet <br /> the various goals of the Town for this site. The Task Force has reduced its initial suggestion of up to <br /> eight units to up to six in response to residents' input. It also understands that the nature of the <br /> buildings to be built on this site must be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood and should <br /> reference the existing farm house,for which the neighbors feel genuine affection. The Task Force <br /> recommends that the developer, whether LexHAB or not, provide more information to residents and <br /> continue to work toward a consensus solution that offers reasonable satisfaction to all stakeholders. <br /> The Task Force held two community meetings, mailing notice to all residents of the Vine Street area. <br /> The initial meeting of November 16 was held toward the beginning of the Task Force's work when no <br /> specific proposal had been developed, and the second was held March 17,when the Task Force put <br /> forward its initial proposal of eight units. The meetings were well attended and residents have made <br /> their concerns clear. While there seems to be a reluctant acceptance of the need to remove the farm <br /> house and a general acceptance of two new units on the property, residents are still unhappy with an <br /> unaccustomed level of density on their street, and concerned about traffic. It is expected that as the <br /> plans for the property are developed, there will continue to be meetings with the neighbors. <br /> NOVEMBER 16, 2010: TASK FORCE COMMUNITY MEETING #1 <br /> This meeting was attended by the Task Force and approximately two dozen Vine Street area <br /> residents. For most of the attending residents, this was the first chance to hear about Town planning for <br /> the portion of the Leary property designated for housing. The Task Force presented a summary of the <br /> acquisition and funding of the property and the intent to develop affordable housing on the edge of the <br /> property abutting Vine Street. The Task Force did not put forward any specific design plan or number of <br /> units to be developed but concentrated on receiving input from the neighbors. A number of attendees <br /> stated that they wished the existing farm house to remain in place, and that they were concerned about <br /> any substantial density of development on the property because of increased traffic and lack of <br /> integration with the existing neighborhood. A few also voiced their concerns about how storm water <br /> runoff would be handled. It was generally stated that the neighbors did not object to affordable housing <br /> per se, as long as their practical concerns were addressed. <br /> MARCH 17, 2011: TASK FORCE COMMUNITY MEETING #2 <br /> This meeting was attended by the Task Force and approximately twelve Vine Street area residents. <br /> At this meeting the Task Force suggested that six to eight affordable units could be accommodated on <br /> the Leary housing parcel. They offered illustrations of existing housing developments in other towns <br /> that they believed had incorporated multiple small units in attractive buildings in the style of existing <br /> neighborhood architecture. The Task Force reported that it had advised the Board of Selectmen to seek <br /> Community Preservation Act funding for initial site planning and design work and for basic stabilization <br /> of the existing farm house while a decision was made as to whether to attempt to preserve it. The <br /> Selectmen had forwarded the application for funding for the site and design work, but declined to seek <br /> funding for stabilization of the house. After review of a study of the house's condition, the Selectmen <br /> felt that preserving it would be costly and result in so much replacement as to constitute a replica rather <br /> than a renovated building. They also felt that the expenditure on the house as an affordable unit would <br /> be out of line with the cost of building new units. <br /> 12 <br />