2018-11-15-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

poll to support the project with 7 votes in favor and 2 votes from Ms. Rhodes and Mr. Hornig for "needs more information". 5) Executive Session under Exemption 6—The CPC discussed if Wendy Manz, Capital Expenditures Committee liaison to the CPC should be permitted to join Executive Session under Exemption 6. The purpose of the session would be to discuss the minutes from the 10-4-18 Executive Session and a general update. It was decided that since she was present for the 10-4-18 Executive Session, she would be permitted to stay. After a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted by roll call (9-0) to enter into Executive Session at 5:13 PM under Exemption 6 to consider the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property and to reconvene in open session; the Chair declaring that an open meeting might have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the Town At 5:30 PM, after a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted in a roll call vote (9-0) to exit Executive Session and return to Open Session to attend to the remain agenda items. 6) Committee Business-The Committee discussed the schedule and decided to call Peter Coleman back to a future meeting to discuss a cost breakdown of the proposed Inter Municipal Agreement with Minuteman High School to build a Recreation Athletic complex at Minuteman. A Committee member asked if there are any other possible late applications for FY20 funding. Mr. Wolk stated that there may be a Conservation land acquisition in addition to the one already on the projects list. It was suggested to put the additional land acquisition on the project list as a place holder. The Committee was reminded that the Needs Assessment drafts must be sent to Ms. Federico on or before November 21, 2018 so that she can compile the first d raft. The recent court case of Boelter v Wayland was briefly discussed. Ms. Federico informed the Committee of her phone calls to both the Division of Local Government and Nadie Rice Town Clerk, pertaining to the distribution of the edited Needs Assessment. Ms. Federico received conflicting answers and ultimately it was decided to distribute the Needs Assessment with the edits as long as individual Committee members were not identified as making the edits.This decision was based on what Ms. Rice advised categorizing the distribution of the Report as an administrative responsibility. 4