2018-11-15-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

form not only tells the history of the property but also its architectural importance. This is important for potential reconstruction in the future.The Town of Lexington will celebrate its 250th anniversary of the Battle of Lexington and Concord in 2025 and the Inventory needs to reflect accurate information not only for residents but for tourists who will be visiting the Town. Mr. Kelland stated that the modest request of$20,000 will see a major return, benefiting more than just the community. The CPC raised the question of priorities since the funding requests for all FY20 projects are considerable. Ms. Fenollosa stated that in comparison to other Historic funding requests this one ranks high in priority because of the requirements for matching funds from the state. Ms. Walker commented that since this project impacts homeowners, it is a high priority. Mr. Pressman asked if sites require a building. Mr. Kelland responded no. Sites don't require a building, giving as examples the Old Burial Ground and the Battle Green. Ms. Fenollosa added that both sites and buildings will be looked at during the project and that the location of archeological sites will not be released to the public for fear of interference. Ms. Fenollosa also commented that the preparation of Inventory Forms has been acknowledged as a form of preservation and the project would qualify for CPA funding. The CPC voted in a straw poll to support the project (9-0). 2) Request to Allow Late Application for LexHAB- Mr. Phelan came in front of the CPC to respectfully withdraw LexHAB's late application for FY20 funding. Mr. Phelan explained that Bill Kennedy, Chair, of LexHAB could not appear before the Committee due to family matters. The reason why Mr. Phelan wanted to withdraw his application is because upon review of the materials submitted it was apparent that the request would not qualify for CPA funding. The initial application requested funds for general maintenance of LexHAB properties. General maintenance is not allowed under the CPA Statute. It was also noted that the majority of properties listed on the work summary were not acquired with CPA funds, thus making them ineligible for rehabilitation funding. Mr. Phelan commented that the list provided is a general summary of maintenance for all LexHAB properties. The Committee discussed whether withdrawing the application was the best course of action for Mr. Phelan. It was stated that the CPC has a long-standing relationship with LexHAB, and considering that the organization is operated by volunteers, that an extension should be permitted. Mr. Pressman also commented that the application should be allowed because currently there are no other Community Housing projects for FY20. The Committee agreed to allow an extension for LexHAB to submit an application and presentation by the next CPC meeting on November 29 that meets the CPA criteria for eligibility. It was also emphasized that the 2