Laserfiche WebLink
11/6/2018 AC Minutes <br /> Minutes <br /> Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee (AC) <br /> November 6, 2018 <br /> Place and Time: Parker Room, Town Office Building, 7:30 p.m. <br /> Members Present: John Bartenstein, Chair; Glenn Parker, Vice-Chair; Alan Levine, Secretary; <br /> Ellen Basch; Eric Michelson; Richard Neumeier; Nick Nichols; Lily Manhua Yan; <br /> Carolyn Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager, Finance (non-voting, ex-officio) <br /> Member(s)Absent: Sanjay Padaki <br /> Other Attendees: None <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. <br /> Announcements <br /> Mr. Bartenstein reported on the Board of Selectmen's (BoS)November 5, 2018 meeting: <br /> • The BoS made no changes to the funding sources previously identified for Article 3: <br /> Appropriate for Center Streetscape Design or Article 5: Appropriate for Hosmer House <br /> Reuse Study, which are being presented to the Special Town Meeting 2018-1. This <br /> information triggered a discussion by this Committee about issues associated with the <br /> personal property tax and the use of the Capital Stabilization Fund (CSF). Ms. Kosnoff <br /> noted that whatever may be decided about the use of the CSF, it must be transparent. <br /> • The BoS also discussed the preliminary tax classifications that were presented by the <br /> Board of Assessors. It appears that the percentage increases in residential and <br /> commercial taxes will be more balanced next year than has been the case in recent years. <br /> Mr. Bartenstein said that this Committee's November 13 meeting will be in the Ellen Stone Room <br /> in the Cary Memorial Building. The photographer for the Town Report will come at 7:00 p.m. to <br /> take a committee photo. <br /> Report to the Fall Special Town Meeting (STM 2018-1) <br /> Subsequent to this Committee's November 1, 2018 meeting, Mr. Levine, Mr. Bartenstein, and Mr. <br /> Parker had made edits to this Committee's draft report. The new draft was distributed, and the text <br /> associated with each article was reviewed. Edits were suggested and incorporated by Mr. Parker. <br /> The process resulted in discussion and votes, as follows: <br /> • Article 5: Appropriate for Hosmer House Reuse Study: It was noted that the Historic <br /> District Commission had supported the idea of moving the Hosmer House, located in <br /> close proximity to the Police Headquarters, to a different location on the current site. <br /> This would make it possible to expand the police headquarters to include the current <br /> Hosmer House location. The reuse study would help determine potential uses for the <br /> building, which could influence the best new location. <br /> Prior to this meeting, this Committee's vote to support an appropriation for the Hosmer <br /> House Reuse Study was 5-2-1. Mr. Parker added an affirmative vote for the project. <br /> 1 <br />