|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2018-08-16-PBC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Permanent Building Committee-PBC
>
Minutes
>
2010 - 2019
>
2018
>
2018-08-16-PBC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 1:57:46 PM
Creation date
9/20/2018 1:24:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PBC - Permanent Building Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A motion was made by J. Himmel and seconded by D. Perry to approve the recommendation from <br /> the prequalification committee of the prequalified trade contractors based on the evaluation <br /> conducted. Discussion: None. Vote:All in favor. Motion passes. <br /> Hastings portion of the meeting ends at 8:53 pm. <br /> 4. Lexington Children's Place— Donna DiNisco, (DiNisco Designs), Vivian Low(DiNisco Designs) <br /> Donna updated the committee the late start for demolition was due to National Grid's delay on <br /> getting the natural gas on site capped. Demolition is now underway; however, S&R is slightly behind <br /> schedule with an original date of completion by Sept. 1St. S&R is working hard to wrap up demolition <br /> before Sept. 11 to <br /> • Filed sub bids have been received and need to be awarded by Sept. 10th. The GC bid date has <br /> been extended. <br /> • A review of the August 1St, 2018 Green Engineering Report stated: "Figure 1 below presents <br /> the energy use index (EUI)of the Code Baseline and the Proposed Design. In summary the <br /> design exceeds ASHRAE 90.1 2013 requirements with 50% site energysavings. This <br /> translates to a LEEDv4 energy cost savings of 20.6%. It is important to note the distinction <br /> that Code references energy use performance while LEED references energy cost performance. <br /> The Green House Gas(GHG) emissions for the proposed design are estimated at 34.5 <br /> MTCO2e, an approximately 40.2% reduction from the Code Baseline." <br /> • PBC discussed the topic of gas onsite brought up at the Aug. 28th BOS, SC and PBC meeting. <br /> There is apparently a big misconception in town about the intent of this emergency gas fire <br /> element and the presents of gas on the site. <br /> The existing building had gas service. The gas fired element being proposed is strictly for <br /> emergency use during the coldest months of the year should there be a utility company power <br /> outage. The proposed emergency generator is being sized to provide power to run the life safety <br /> requirements of the building, primary functions related to the buildings required `resilience' rating, <br /> and the two VRFs service the classroom wings. The option is to upsize the generator and burn <br /> more fuel generator electric or supply an inexpensive gas fired element to heat the administrative <br /> wing. Further discussion is needed regarding using gas for backup use only. <br /> 5. School Master Plan Discussion— Kate Colburn (School Committee) <br /> Kate addressed that the last School Master Plan was in 2014, with projects being completed and <br /> new ones beginning. Enrollments continue to rise, and the SC suggests taking a new look at the <br /> current Master Plan. Kate would like to form a group of 15 people from various committees, and is <br /> looking to start efforts in Sept. and complete the review by the end of the school year. <br /> Mike Cronin suggested that PBC members interested in participating on the School Master Plan <br /> should email him. <br /> PBC Meeting 08.16.18 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.