Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lucente asked if the assessment would this be for just a Community Center expansion, or to <br /> address recreational activities throughout town. He also questioned how this study would relate <br /> to what the Town is already asking for and paying for in the comprehensive plan? <br /> Charlotte Rodgers explained that the needs assessment could help inform strategic planning. She <br /> agreeed that there is some overlap and we need to be careful not to duplicate work. The Town is <br /> also currently involved in Livable Lexington and the Transportation Study. <br /> Mr. Alessandrini stressed that we should use all our unused spaces in an efficient way. He <br /> reminded the group that the Carriage House will cost more money to update than it is worth. He <br /> is in favor of the idea of using a public-private partnership to accomplish this. <br /> Ms. Pfrommer added that the Recreation Committee will need to keep the study broad enough to <br /> get unexpected results but not so broad that it would dilute the results. <br /> Ms. Rodgers recalled that when the community center was in its planning stage,it grew to a <br /> vision, and it was nice to be a part of that visioning process. As we look at the demographics, <br /> Lexington is unique in that the youth population is high and seniors are high while there is a dip <br /> in the middle. This needs to be recognized. <br /> Ms. Shepard recaped that once the scope is determined, it will be important to distinguish <br /> between this study and the others going on. The CCPAC will try to define and figure out where <br /> they sit in relation to the Recreation Committee, as well as determine how to work together to <br /> reach out to involve all groups. Meeting together a couple times a year will help with a shared <br /> vision. <br /> 5. Review of Goals <br /> The Committee goals were submitted to the Board of Selectman back in June. Ms.Pfrommer <br /> stated the importance of intergenerational programming as one our goals. Upon discussion of <br /> other service providers in the Town, she also added that completing a needs assessment will help <br /> drive and focus what we can offer that the Town may be lacking. <br /> Mr. Lucente explained that the Board of Selectman reviewed the goals and narrowed the over 50 <br /> goals to down to 22. The#1 goal is capital planning, along with public-private partnerships as a <br /> source of funding. <br /> Mr. Alessandrini stresseed that 575,000 is not a shoe-in ask, as a study. The Committee will <br /> need to show and campaign how this ask would align with BOS goals. It will be important to <br /> meet and present with other committees. <br /> Ms. Pfrommer asked if there a time to review the goals to see how we are doing. The group <br /> agreed that it would be good to evaluate in the coming months. <br /> 5. Community Center Director Updates <br /> • The LCC ran 31 half and/or full day program at the LCC with a total of 268 <br /> participants over the summer. The programs were a mix of chess, movie making, <br /> STEAM, Minecraft, and computer programming themed. <br /> • Programs ran for 8 weeks from June 25-August 20, no July 4 week. <br /> • The End of the Summer Party has 315 guests who have registered as "interested" on <br /> the Facebook event. Sponsors of the event include the Lexington Lions, Police, <br /> Russian School of Math, CAAL, Rotary Club, and Lexington Human Services. <br /> • A Teen Interview Workshop will be on the evening of August 29 and currently there <br /> are 9 students registered. <br /> • Surveys were sent out each week to evaluate the summer youth programs. Many <br /> responses were returned with good information and suggestions for improvement next <br /> year. <br />