Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of November 18, 1985 Page 3 <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES <br />259. Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element: meeting with the Housing Needs <br />Advisory Committee: The Board resumed work on the draft of the Housing Element <br />of the Comprehensive Plan, dated November 18, 1985, with Eleanor Klauminzer, Joel <br />Adler, William Spencer, and William Hays of the Housing Needs Advisory Committee <br />present. <br />Mr. Sorensen did not agree with a statement on page 4 in the draft. He pointed <br />out land is not a fixed cost; its value increases as the density increases. <br />Mr. Spencer questioned the emphasis on encouraging more smaller -sized units as <br />stated on page 5. Mrs. Smith felt that the "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINITION OF <br />AFFORDABILITY" section on page 7, which incorporates 1985 income data, needs more <br />detailed work; the results are rental levels that are too high. <br />On page 8, the Board and the Committee agreed to drop the "FOR STUDY:" under <br />POLICY 2.10 item which suggested using as a target the number and percentage of <br />housing units in the town be affordable by households with varying incomes in <br />relationship to the income distribution in the Boston metropolitan area. <br />On page 10, Mrs. Flemings and Mrs. Smith both objected to POLICIES 4.4 and 4.5. <br />which read as follows: <br />Policy 4.4: Provide accelerated processing and reduced fees for <br />' developments consisting entirely or predominantly of affordable housing. <br />Policy 4.5: Adjust the timing of previously scheduled public improvements, <br />such as streets or utilities, to make potential sites available for use for <br />affordabale housing, or to share development costs. <br />Mrs. Smith felt there could be abuse and Mrs. Flemings felt they were not fair. <br />The Board agreed there should be more work on the "Town Government; Development <br />Regulations" section on page 11, which deals with providing incentives to produce <br />more affordable housing and introduces disincentives to discourage the use of <br />remaining sites suitable for development for other than affordable housing. <br />Mr. Sorensen objected to the limit on appreciation of housing to 4 per cent on <br />page 12; he felt it should be allowed to go up by index. Mr. Bowyer noted that <br />this language came from the "Inclusionary Housing Policy" that was presented to <br />Town Meeting, and used for Muzzey School. Mrs. Smith felt there should be more <br />study first. On page 14, Mrs. Smith questioned whether the mixing of residential <br />uses in commercial and industrial areas would only benefit people of moderate <br />income and higher. <br />The Board and the Committee agreed to continue the review of the Fusing Element <br />of the Comprehensive Plan on December 9, 1985. <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:43 p.m. <br />