|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1985-08-12
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-08-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:41:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes, August 12, 1985 <br />page 4 <br />On the motion of Mr. Cripps, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted unanimously <br />to accept the covenant, pending approval of the street name, review by Town <br />Counsel and placing the revision dates on the mylar originals. <br />On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mr. Cripps, it was voted unanimously <br />to endorse the plans. Mr. Bowyer will ensure that the street name is approved and <br />added to the drawings, and the covenant corrected. <br />The Town Engineer is not satisfied with the construction details for the retain- <br />ing wall in the street right-of-way. He says a retaining wall should have a <br />footing below the frost line which would require a four foot foundation under the <br />wall. That is the Town's standard for retaining wall construction. The developer <br />feels this is not necessary, and too expensive. Mr. Smith said they would have <br />to substitue a slope for the retaining wall which will result in losing more <br />trees. Board members did not like the idea of extensive slopes rather than the <br />retaining walls on the approved plan. The staff will consult with Mr. Fields <br />again re the need for a foundation that deep and what design was used for the <br />wall built by the Town at North -Adams Street intersection. Mr. Fields will be <br />invited to attend the meeting on September 9. <br />184. Hampton, off Concord Avenue: change to site plan: Mr. Bowyer reported that <br />the same issue of retaining wall vs. slope occurred in the Hampton subdivision. <br />There the developer proposes to use a retaining wall rather than the slope that <br />was shown on the plan. The Board will discuss this with the Town Engineer on <br />' September 9 also. <br />185. Pheasant Brook, Kahn -Quinn; acceptance of surety, release of lots: Sidney <br />Gorovitz, representing the developer, presented the surety and release of lot <br />forms to be signed by the Board. <br />The Board informed Mr. Gorovitz that the sign at the entrance of the subdivision <br />was expressly disapproved by the Board in the Certificate of Action approving the <br />subdivision and is not permitted by the Zoning By -Law. Mr. Gorovitz said the <br />sign will be brought in to conformity with the Zoning By -Law. Mr. Bowyer noted <br />that probably meant the sign had to be removed. Mr. Gorovitz said he understood <br />and it would be taken care of. Mr. Gorovitz had no objection to language being <br />included in the Release of Lots indicating certain lots were subject to further <br />action by the Conservation Commission. <br />On a motion by Mr. Sorensen seconded by Mr. Cripps, it was voted unanimously: 1) <br />to accept as surety Merchants Co -Operative Bank passbook #60-064343 in the amount <br />of $500,000, with assignment to the Town of Lexington, 2) to sign the Release of <br />Lots Form releasing lots 1-67, with language about subsequent approval of certain <br />lots by the Conservation Commission, and the missing book and page reference to <br />be added, and 3) to instruct the staff to hold the Release of Lots document <br />until: (a) Town Counsel is satisfied that the plan has been completely and cor- <br />rectly recorded, and (b) the sign at the Maple Street entrance is brought into <br />conformity with the Zoning By -Law. <br />Change in Special Permit for site plan details: <br />Lot 3 - Permission has been granted by the Conservation Commission to move <br />and replace a wet meadow. Ms. Rawski feels that contours should be more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.