1985-08-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes, August 12, 1985 page 2 Mrs. Flemings reported on the meetings and the activities of the Committee. Mr. Hays explained that the Committee had been created by action of the Selectmen to explore the possibilities of congregate housing in Lexington. The Committee first worked toward defining the need and developing physical and design require- ments, including investigating what the private sector might provide. The Selectmen were interested in what type of controls and regulations might be necessary and what services are provided in existing examples of congregate housing. The Committee met with developers and nutrition providers. Developers have found they can't sell congregate housing without private baths and some kind of kitchen facilities, i.e, a small apartment, when they are planning a large development (similar to a large apartment building). The Committee struggled with the prob- lem of keeping the congregate aspect viable as a part of a large development. They wondered if zoning could be used to accomplish this. They felt that conver- sions of existing buildings would not happen without public support as outlined in Part 4 of their draft report. They are also looking at Board of Health regu- lations re congregate housing. Mrs. Edmonds would like the Town to encourage a variety of congregate housing types. The following problems were identified: 1) affordability - high cost of elderly care, staffing/nursing, 2) scarcity of funding, and 3) services already provided to elderly, such as Meals on Wheels, which tend to postpone their acceptance of the congregate living concept. People living independently would rather stay as ' they are and have services added. The committee presented a draft report of their findings to the Board for study. Mrs. Smith commented that the need for independence sometimes outweighs the ability to care for oneself. She felt the Committee did well not only examining need, but looking at how people reacted to the concept of congregate housing. She added that the Planning Board would work with the Committee's recommendations relating to zoning, and that it must continue to be a joint effort. 180. Kiln Brook IV, Conditions in Special Permit: Appointment with Thomas Dupree: Mr. Dupree felt the proposal he discussed with the Planning Board includ- ing a general restriction in each lease he signs with his tenants provides the means to control traffic problems if they occur. He said his tenants react to traffic congestion by readjusting their schedules voluntarily. Mr. Sorensen commented that the roads in the area are saturated, and the Planning Board feels the alleviation of the traffic problems should be divided among all business in the area, hence the solution of roping off portions of parking lots if traffic problems warrant it. Mrs. Smith felt the Town must be able to protect the interests of the Town if the roads in the area become oversaturated by enforcing the restriction proposed by the Board, and can not depend on the promises of individual business to control the problem. She feels this is accomplished by the language the Board has pro- posed in their report on the Special Permit. The Planning Board will report to the Board of Appeals that Mr. Dupree and the Board can not agree. The Board is satisfied with the actions taken by Mr. Dupree in the Kiln Brook IV building to date. The current situation is workable, in