Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />Minutes, April 10, 1985 page 2 <br />affordable and rental housing. She thought the quality of the architecture <br />deserved a favorable comment; she is in favor. <br />Mr. Cripps abstained from the poll. He reported that there had been claims that <br />he had a conflict of interest because some time ago he had some small incidental <br />business dealings with Kelley. He had provided all the information on the situa- <br />tion to the Town Counsel who reviewed it and also checked with the State Ethics <br />Commission. Town Counsel had advised him there was no conflict of interest under <br />Massachusetts law and that he had every right to vote on the matter. Mr. Cripps <br />stated to avoid even an appearance of a conflict, he would refrain from voting on <br />the Planning Board's recommendation. <br />Mrs. Flemings made the point that the Planning Board was not making a determina- <br />tion of compliance with the Wetland Protection Act. That is the responsibility <br />of the Conservation Commission. While the Planning Board consults with the <br />Conservation Commission and has the benefit of their advise, the Planning Board <br />cannot make a wetlands determination. The Conservation Commission has a record <br />of thoroughness and protection of the interests of residents and of the Town and <br />she was confident the wetland issues would be addressed thoroughly. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. <br />r/ Judith J. Ukfrig, Clerk <br />