Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />The revised draft of the Recreation Questionnaire and related issues <br />were discussed at some length. It was suggested that the Recreation <br />Plan of 1966 should be reviewed and examined by the Planning Board <br />members and further discussion will take place after that review. <br />On Mrs. Brown's suggestion, it was agreed to establish the following <br />priority groups for 1971 work projects: <br />Central Business District. <br />#1 Special permit uses, especially commercial recreation. <br />Revision of Subdivision Rules which involves street standards <br />and policies. <br />#2 Recreation Plan including Commercial recreation and conservation. <br />Wetland development controls. <br />Housing. <br />#3 RM regulations, extension of PUD concept. <br />Concord Avenue area plan <br />RECREATION <br />QUESTIONNAIRE <br />The methods and approaches of handling the above were debated. It is <br />the opinion of the Board that it can consider each issue best by using <br />past plans and policies (such as the EDA report for CBD, 1966 Recreation <br />Plan, etc.) as points of departure. On matters which are primarily tech- <br />nical, such as Subdivision Regulations and Wetlands, the planning director <br />will prepare drafts for review by the Board. It was decided to discuss the <br />CBD on July 12, street standards on July 19 and housing on July 26. Con- <br />cord Avenue area plan will be discussed on August 2nd. Copies of available <br />information on the 1966 Recreation Plan will be distributed to members for <br />review and preliminary discussion on July 12. <br />The members were informed of a meeting of the Historic Districts Comm. on HISTORIC DIST. <br />July 14 for a preliminary review of the Central Block plans to which the COMMISSION/ <br />Planning Board has been invited. Mr. Lund indicated that he will probab- CENTRAL BLOCK <br />ly attend. The public hearing on July 27 of the Historic Districts Comm. <br />will also be concerned with the Central Block construction. <br />A Mass. Supreme Court decision regarding the powers of the Board of HealthSUPREME COURT <br />to impose conditions related to subdivision drainage was reviewed at this DECISION, <br />time. It was agreed that copies of the decision will be obtained and dis-BD. OF HEALTH <br />tributed to members and to the Conservation Commission. <br />Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn the meeting <br />at 10:55 p.m. <br />Donald M. Graham <br />Clerk <br />