Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MEETING <br />April 12, 1971 <br />Chairman Lund called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m, with members Mrs. <br />Brown, Dr. Clarke, Mr. Graham and Mr. Costello, planning director Mr. <br />Zaleski, DAC representative Mr. Galehouse and secretary Mrs. Cole. <br />Also present were Lexington Minute -Man reporter Mr. Curran, Doreen <br />Plasse, Mary Collins and Bernice Crocker. <br />Robert McSweeney of Brothers' Trust, meeting with the Board by appointment, <br />ROBERT <br />submitted a preliminary subdivision plan of land off Young St., known as <br />MC SWEENEY, <br />the Battleview Park, for which Mr. McSweeney has an option. This land is <br />BATTLEVIEW <br />shown divided into 25 ft. lots fronting on First and Second streets (paper <br />PARK, OFF <br />streets) on a plan recorded in 1913 at the Registry of Deeds. In 1957 <br />YOUNG ST. <br />(A57-103) an identical plan was endorsed by the Planning Board "approval <br />not required" for the purpose of registering the title in Land Court. <br />First and Second streets, shown on the plan, have never been constructed. <br />Mr. McSweeney proposes to construct the streets, intall municipal services, <br />including a dry sewer for a future connection, and consolidate the 25 ft. <br />lots into 62.5, 75 and 100 ft. wide building lots having less than the <br />minimum frontage and area currently required by the Zoning By -Law. In 1965, <br />on advice of Town Counsel, the Board refused to approve a plan submitted by <br />the owner at that time, Mr. Richey, showing consolidation of lots into 75 <br />and 100 ft. wide lots. Discussion followed as to whether the land can be <br />properly drained and sewered, since it is surrounded by higher land on all <br />sides, and whether streets could be constructed without requiring provision <br />for 30,000 sq. ft. ltos. It was decided to ask Town Counsel the following <br />questions: "If the developer is willing to lay out the streets, sewers, <br />etc., can he build on the land as he has proposed and what power does the <br />Planning Board have on this?" Mr. McSweeney left a set of plans with the <br />Board. <br />At 8:40 p.m. Bud Connelly, speaking for Paul Nelson of Oneida Corp.,"DrummexONEIDA CORP. <br />Boy" subdivision, T. Reenstierna, D. McKechnie and J. Moore met with the Board DRUMMER BOY <br />by appointment to discuss the Hadley Rd. extension. The Planning Director SUBDIVISION <br />said that drainage questions have been generally resolved to the satisfaction <br />of the Town Engineer and the only question still remaining was that of Hadley <br />Rd. ext. and whether it could be built on fill in a manner meeting our sub- <br />division requirements without being too close to the Edison Power lines. <br />Mr. McKechnie submitted a preliminary profile showing that a road at 109 grade <br />would have 23.5 ft. clearance from the power lines. The profile was left with <br />the planning director to be submitted to the town engineer. An extension of <br />the time for Planning Board action is expected to be requested. Mr. Connelly <br />asked whether Hadley Rd. would have to be constructed and the chairman replied <br />in the affirmative. The construction of Hadley Rd. would be one of the condi- <br />tions of subdivision approval to meet the requirement for a second access. It <br />was suggested that the developer bond most of the subdivision, including <br />Hadley Rd. extension, to permit the release of lots before the second access <br />is contructed. Should an acceptable alternate second access become available, <br />such as across the Ben Franklin Homes land to Grove St., the Planning Board <br />could then waive the requirement of building Hadley Rd. extension. <br />' It was agreed that the developer's engineer will submit a definitive profile <br />and construction plan of Hadley Rd. extension as soon as practicable. When <br />these are reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer, including the necessary <br />