Laserfiche WebLink
8- 18-58 <br />r <br />' 1958 letter to the Planning Directors the Board gave <br />further consideration to Mr. Frederic S. Johnson's <br />rezoning petition. (See minutes of Planning Board's <br />June 30* 1958 meeting.) Mr. Snow reported that Mr. <br />Johnson had paid the application fee which had been <br />determined by the Board. September 4s 1958 at 8:30 <br />p.m. was set tentatively for a public hearing on <br />said petition. 8:00 p.m. on the same date was re- <br />served for the hearing on the proposed professional <br />office amendment to the Zoning By-law. <br />1 <br />1 <br />..2w <br />Mr. Snow reported that he had discussed with <br />the Town Counsel various matters in regard to the <br />Board's approval of Raymond F. Boudreau's subdivi- <br />sion plan entitled "Sunnyknoll Lexington* Mass." <br />Mr. Snow said that as a result of this discussion he <br />had prepared the plan for endorsement and an accom- <br />panying letter of transmittal for the Board's consid- <br />eration. The Board endorsed said plan with -the <br />notation thereon, "Parcel A does not comply with the <br />minimum requirements of the Lexington Zoning By- <br />law." In view of the fact that the Town Counsel was <br />on vacations it was decided that in this case only <br />the subdivider be permitted to record in the Registry <br />of Deeds the definitive Alan endorsed by the Board. <br />The Board then approved said letter which was signed <br />by the Chairman. (See addendum.) <br />At 8:50 p.m. Chairman Donald E. Nickerson of <br />the Board of Appeals met with the Planning Board to <br />discuss an anticipated request from Mr. Anthony R. <br />Cataldo for a variance to use the Lexington railroad <br />station for banking purposes. Mr. Nickerson said <br />that it was the Board of Appeals' opinion that a <br />change in zone should be sought rather than said, <br />variance from the Board of Appeals. Members of the <br />Planning Board stated that before making any deci- <br />sion in regard to the matter, more information was <br />needed particularly in regard to how much land was <br />involved. Mr. Nickerson agreed to obtain this in- <br />formation. <br />There was then discussed with Mr. Nickerson <br />the problem of special office buildings in a single <br />family residential district* particularly the pro- <br />posal that professional offices should be limited to <br />use by a person residing in the dwelling and that <br />buildings should not be converted wholly to office <br />use. Mr. Nickerson concurred in, the opinion that <br />an amendment .to the zoning by-law setting forth the <br />above considerations should be proposed. Thereupon* <br />he left the meeting at 9:10 p.m. <br />JOHNSON <br />REZONING <br />PETITION <br />SUNNYSNOLL <br />R1toC2 <br />REZONING <br />PROPOSAL <br />CATALDO <br />PROPOSED <br />ZONING <br />AMENDMENT <br />PROFES- <br />SIONAL <br />OFFICES <br />