Laserfiche WebLink
J-11 -56 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />area on the McCormack -Brun land adjacent to the <br />McCORMACK <br />Harrington School, he and Mr. Boyle had studied and <br />AND BRUN <br />discussed the matter further with Recreation Director <br />- <br />Samborski. Mr. Snow stated as a result of these dis- <br />PROPOSED <br />cussions Mr. Boyle had prepared a study plan entitled <br />HARRINGTON <br />"Harrington School Recreation Area," and dated July 20, <br />SCHOOL <br />1958. It was noted that in comparison to the previously <br />RECREATION <br />discussed June 19, 1958 plan (see minutes of Planning <br />AREA <br />BoardTs June 23, 1958 meeting), most of the Bryant lot <br />numbered 344 Lowell Street had not been included in the <br />July 20 plan, and that about eight acres of the Mc- <br />Cormack -Brun land, including the parcel over which the <br />Town had an easement to the Harrin7ton School, would <br />be needed for a reduced number of those facilities <br />listed in Mr. Snow's June 20, 1958 memorandum. Mr. <br />Snow said that, in his opinion, the facilities shown <br />on the July 20 plan constituted only a neighborhood <br />rather than a major recreation area. From a long-range <br />standpoint he recommended including the Bryant land <br />in any proposal for the ultimate development of the <br />area. The Board took the study under advisement.. <br />Conside,red next by the Board was Mr. Snow's <br />REZONING <br />proposal that Sec. 5(a)7.c. of the zoning by-law be <br />PROPOSAL <br />amended so that there could be no further interpre- <br />tation that professional offices also meant pro- <br />PROFES- <br />fessional office buildings. Mr. Snow said that it <br />SIONAL <br />was his understanding that intent of allowing pro - <br />OFFICES IN <br />fessional offices in single family residences was <br />R 1 DIS- <br />only from the standpoint of said offices being <br />TRICTS <br />accessory uses incidental to the conduct of a pro- <br />fession by residents of the premises. He distributed <br />excerpts covering such uses from the zoning by-laws of <br />the towns of Canton and Walpole and pointed out that <br />other Massachusetts towns such as Concord, Waltham, <br />Wayland and Winchester had similar provisions in their <br />by-laws. The South Central Regional Planning Board <br />of Connecticut definition of a brofessional office <br />was also considered, namely: "An office of recognized <br />professions such as doctors, dentists, lawyers, <br />architects, engineers, artists, musicians, designers, <br />teachers, and others who through training are quali- <br />fied to perform services of a professional nature." <br />After a discussion of the various aspects of the pro- <br />posal, it was taken under advisement. <br />The Board decided to hold its next meeting on <br />August 18, 1958. Thereupon, the meeting adjourned at <br />9:45 p.m. <br />Thomas S. Grin dle, <br />Chairman <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />