Laserfiche WebLink
Appeals setting forth its reasons for the Planning Board's <br />opposition. <br />While the notice referred to a sign of an approxi- <br />mate size of 29 sq. ft., it was noted that the proposed <br />over-all dimensions of said sign, including the standards, <br />were to be 13 feet wide and 14-1/2 feet high. The Board <br />believes that a large sign of such a nature as the peti- <br />tioner proposes is entirely out of keeping with any use in <br />Lexington and wit any standards this town has always tried <br />to maintain. It is the opinion of the Board that such a <br />sign does not "conserve the value of land and buildings" <br />and/or "preserves the increases amenities" of the town, two <br />very important purposes of the zoning regulations set forth <br />in Section 3 of Chapter 40A of the General Lags. <br />Board of Appeals <br />Town Office Building <br />Lexington 73, Mass. <br />Gentlemen: <br />Yours very truly, <br />LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD <br />/s/ Thomas S. Grindle, Chairman <br />November 26, 1957 <br />Re: Leonard B. Short Retition <br />to maintainseparate building, <br />from main structure, as a <br />dwelling <br />Reference is made to the petition set forth above. <br />At a regular meeting of the Planning Board held on November <br />1$, 1957s,it was decided to go on record as being opposed to <br />the granting of said petition and to write to the Board of <br />Appeals setting forth the reasons for said opposition. <br />As a matter of policy the Planning Board is opposed <br />to more than one building on a lot being used for residen- <br />tial purposes. It is the understanding of the Board, in <br />this case, that on December 5, 1956 the Building Inspector <br />issued a building permit to Dr.Short "to convert a 3 -car <br />garage into a laboratory for accessory use to practice" and <br />that during the past few months said laboratory has been <br />used for residential purposes. The Planning Board sees no <br />reason, .therefore, why a denial of the petition would in- <br />volve substantial hardship to the. appellant. <br />Yours very truly, <br />LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD <br />/s/ Thomas S. Grindle, Chairman <br />1 <br />1 <br />