1957-10-03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1^-3-57 vantage, that using the recommended arrangement only one ' system of drains need to be constructed in the subdivision, and that these drains could be located within the street rights of way and be connected directly with the catch basins used to collect surface runoff from the streets. In addition to the above matters, a number of others were discussed. There appeared to be some differ- ence of opinion in regard to development costs. It was agreed that Mr. Snow would consult with the Recreation Com- mittee to determine just how large an area was to be recom- mended for acquisition for recreation purposes. It was agreed also that after this area was determined the Planning Board would consult with the Superintendent of Public Works obtaining from him construction requirements and cost esti- mates for developing the subdivision proposals and that after this information was obtained it might be necessary for the sup_ erintendent and the Board to discuss said inform- ation with Iiessrs. IicCormack and Brun and their engineers. In agreeing to do this, it was understood by the Board that its recommended general street arrangement was to be used in developing the subdivision whether or not the town ac- quired a recreation area as proposed. -aP�e Thomas S. Grindle, Chairman ADDENDUM September 7,1957 I�ir. Paul J. McCormack 1775 Nassachusetts Avenue Lexington, Massachusetts Dear I,ir. 'McCormack: In regard to the land in the rear of the Harrington School which you proposed to subdivide, we have -tudied the scheme submitted to ' you by the Lexington Planning Board and , in reference thereto, have the following comments to.:make. The plan received was drawn to the scale of 200 feet to an inch. This was enlarged to the scale of 100 feet to an inch so that the Messrs. IicCormack and Brun left the meeting at ' 10:00 p..m. at which time the meeting was adjourned. -aP�e Thomas S. Grindle, Chairman ADDENDUM September 7,1957 I�ir. Paul J. McCormack 1775 Nassachusetts Avenue Lexington, Massachusetts Dear I,ir. 'McCormack: In regard to the land in the rear of the Harrington School which you proposed to subdivide, we have -tudied the scheme submitted to ' you by the Lexington Planning Board and , in reference thereto, have the following comments to.:make. The plan received was drawn to the scale of 200 feet to an inch. This was enlarged to the scale of 100 feet to an inch so that the