|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1957-09-09
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1950-1959
>
1957
>
1957-09-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:12 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:17:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Snow having prepared the plan for display purposes <br />at the Special Town Meeting to be held on September 17, <br />which time the Board held a detailed discussion with <br />him in regard to the procedure to be followed in pro- <br />' <br />cessing plans such as the one accompanying application <br />#57-$5. It was pointed out that the state enabling <br />legislation was inadequate in setting forth procedure <br />to be followed in handling cases such as this and that <br />what was needed was a practical way of handling similar <br />situations. Mr. Stevens stated that any determination <br />of Planning Board jurisdiction made by said board was <br />final. He said that in this case, where the lot was <br />to be used for the construction of an Edison substation, <br />there was no point in c;etermining that approval under <br />the subdivision control law was required even though <br />the lot did not have the minimum frontage required for <br />a single family residence district under the town's <br />zoning by-law. He asked what the Board could require <br />of the subdivider in view of the fact that the proposed <br />lot would front on a public way; namely, Bedford Street, <br />which had adequate construction and municipal services <br />to serve the lot and any buildings to be erected there- <br />on. In regard to similar cases involving unaccepted s <br />streets, Idr. Stevens stated that he believed also there <br />was no point in determining that plans require approval <br />under the subdivision control law unless the Board re- <br />quires work to be done in said ways. <br />Mr. Stevens left the meeting at 9:45 p.m. at <br />which time Mr. Snow called to the Board's attention <br />HANCOCK <br />HEIGHTS <br />the fact that in correcting errors found on the Han- <br />SECS.l & 2 <br />cock Heights Section Two subdivision elan, he had <br />noted that the plan for the first section of the <br />Hancock Heights development had been modified. He <br />recommended that the Section Two plan be withdrawn, <br />corrected, :end resubmitted and that at the same time <br />there also be submitted an application for modifica- <br />tion of the definitive plan of the first section of <br />said development. <br />Mr. Snow also reported to the Board that Mr. <br />ASSOCIATES <br />Manaselian, architect for the Associates Realty Trust, <br />REALTY <br />had submitted two complete sets of building plans for <br />TRUST <br />the hotel said Trust proposed to construct on its site <br />at the northwesterly intersection of Routes 12$ and 2A. <br />It was decided to take no action on said plans until <br />there were submitted also adequate plot and site plans <br />for such building. Mr. Snow was requested to notify <br />Mr. Manaselian of the Board's decision. <br />Shown to the Board and discussed by it was the <br />SHANNON <br />plan showing the location of the so-called North <br />LAND FOR <br />Street gravel pit owned by i'r. Shannon of Randolph, <br />RECREATION <br />Mr. Snow having prepared the plan for display purposes <br />at the Special Town Meeting to be held on September 17, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.