Laserfiche WebLink
VOTED: That the plans accompanying applications <br />X57-15, X57-17, and `A,7-1$ be signed bear- <br />ing the endorsement "Lexington Planning <br />Board approval not required under the Sub- <br />division Control Law." <br />In regard to the plan accompanying the Stankard <br />application, it was notedthat while said application <br />stated that Lot l was to be added to Lot A, there was <br />no assurance that the buyer would not eventually wish <br />to build on Lot 1 fronting on Bacon Street. The <br />Board decided that said private way does not have <br />sufficient i,;idths and adequate construction to pro- <br />vide for the needs of vehicular traffic, etc. The <br />Board decided further that because of these condi- <br />tions it would have to determine that the plan does <br />require subdivision approval unless firs. Stankard <br />and her brother, Mr. Bevington, signed an agreement <br />to be recorded with the plan that Lots A and 1 are <br />deemed to be combined into one lot for all purposes. <br />Mr. Snow was asked to discuss the matter with .'Mirs. <br />Stankard and to suggest that she may wish to with- <br />draw her application until such time as an agree- <br />ment could be drawn or some other arrangement made <br />in regard to the plan. <br />The Board reviewed its January 23, 1957.letter <br />to the School Committee calling to the attention of <br />the committee the imminent possibility of a subdivi- <br />sion being developed on three sides of the Harrington <br />School grounds and suggesting that the committee may <br />wish to acquire additional land for the school be- <br />fore the development takes place. Read to the Board <br />was Supt. Smith's February 5 reply that the present <br />site was adequate for school needs, that the Recrea- <br />tion Committee might wish to establish a more exten- <br />sive playground program on the site and therefore <br />need more land, and the matter might be presented to <br />said committee for a recommendation from that group. <br />It was decided that Chairman Hathaway would arrange <br />for a meeting with the Recreation Committee in re- <br />gard to r. Smith's letter. <br />Considered also was P-ir. Alfred P. Tropeano's <br />February 7, 1957 letter in which he requested that <br />the Planning Board inform him in writing what it was <br />going to recommend in regard to sidewalks and the <br />width of surfacing of streets in the Hawthorne Acre <br />subdivision. He wished this information before his <br />clients, Esco Builders, entered into a purchase and <br />sales agreement with the Town for a junior high <br />school site. In answer to this request the Board <br />decided to reaffirm its previous statement that all <br />streets within the subdivision were to be 50 feet <br />STANKARD <br />HARRINGTON <br />SCHOOL <br />SITE <br />HAUtTH ORNE <br />ACRES <br />iJ <br />1 <br />1 <br />