Laserfiche WebLink
381 <br />The Board said to set aside the proper number of seats, mark the area as such <br />for non-smokers. It would not be the job of the waitress or waiter but the <br />manager to see that people comply with this by-law. <br />The Board had added cafeterias to their proposed regulations. The Town Meeting <br />had only specified restaurants. The Board felt that cafeterias should also be <br />included as employees eat there every day and it is a problem for the non-smokers <br />that eat in these cafeterias. <br />Mr. Smith said that he get complaints from employees of the different business <br />but they remain anonymous because they are afraid they will get fired. They <br />find the smoking in the cafeteria very annoying. <br />Most restaurant managers seemed to be afraid to offend their customers. The <br />girl from Chadwick's said people ask them to tell someone tb put out a cigarette <br />and she tells the person that is offended to speak to the smoker themselves. She <br />also feel the penalty should be done away with. She also wants the percentage of <br />seats to be 18% instead of the 25%. <br />It is unclear among the group of managers just who is responsible for the penalty. <br />The penalty (#5) of the proposed regulations, is unclear to the managers of the <br />restaurants. <br />Mrs. Miley, former Selectman, said a Selectman in Acton had gone into a restaurant <br />in that Town and was asked where they would like to sit, (smoking or non-smoking). <br />The restaurant said that business had really improved since he separated these <br />sections. <br />There were several people in the audience that stressed they would prefer to go <br />to restaurants with a non-smoking section. <br />Laura Derby, one of the proponents of the bill, said she doesn't expect restaurant <br />owners to spend large amounts of money on ventilation systems, she is just asking <br />that the restaurant owners set aside a section for those that do not smoke. <br />A discussion took place with representatives of the cafeterias. Some were all for <br />these by-laws, others were concerned about the % of seats being set aside. <br />Roger Marshall from the Raytheon food services, feels that he is in agreement with <br />this by-law. He said that there is a reduction in smoking and that they are taking <br />out 3 cigarette machines because of lack of interest in using them. <br />Dr. Roemer said at the beginning, this will be a trial period to see how things <br />are going. She said we should meet again with the people here to discuss what <br />has happened. I think you will see it is working out just fine, she said. <br />Marshall Derby, one of the proponents, asked since there is going to be a phase-in <br />period, he would suggest that no variances be given during this period. <br />Robin Ong, Yangtze River Restaurant, asked when this will be in effect. <br />Mr. Lambie said that we have no date until the Attorney -General signs the by-law. <br />Mr. Lambie did say that he hopes the restaurants and cafeterias could go ahead <br />now and set this up on their own. <br />Dr. Roemer stated, to those in attendance, that she is one member of the Board that <br />does not believe in variances, they always cause problems. <br />