2018-03-20-CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Documents: Plan 3/19/2018, Drainage analysis 1/12/2018 Mr. Russell explained that originally one infiltration system was proposed to capture the roof runoff from the garage. During construction, the contractor was unable to get all of the roof runoff to the proposed system, so he installed an additional system. The second system is not functioning properly because it is in the groundwater. Mr. Russell is proposing to increase the size of the original system to capture the roof runoff as well as the runoff from the impermeable patio. Mr. Hamilton entered the Engineering report into the record. Questions and comments from the Commission: The commission asked if the expanded infiltration system has been installed. Mr. Russell stated that it has not been installed. Once they get approval they will install it. The commission stated that they would like to see FENO markers placed along the 25 ft. buffer and across the finger of land that extend far behind the house. They are concerned about mowing in the wetlands area. The applicant stated that they will not mow in that area and are open to FENO markers. Motion to close the hearing made by Mr. Beuttell and seconded by Ms. Dohan. Vote: 4-0 in favor. 7:28pm DEP 201-XXXX, BL XXXX NOI, 23 Hill Street Owner/applicant: Kazumi Wada Project: Raze and rebuild SFD Scott Smyers and Jonathan Shuster- Oxbow Associates Documents: NOI package 2/28/2018, Plan2/26/2018, Drainage analysis 2/26/2018 Mr. Smyers explained that the applicant is proposing to raze and rebuild a single family home. The home will be in the same location as the existing house. The wetland is just off of the property line. Infiltration systems are proposed. FENO markers are proposed along the 25.ft. buffer. Mr. Hamilton entered the engineering report into the record. Questions and comments from the Commission: The commission asked how far the house is from the wetlands. The applicant stated that it is 56 ft. away.