Laserfiche WebLink
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2018 ATM (incorporating Updates&Errata) <br /> The Projects Agenda <br /> The following is a comprehensive list of big-ticket items that are under consideration in Lexington. <br /> Except for the first three items identified by the BoS as the Town's highest priorities—with which this <br /> Committee agrees—no priority ranking is intended;the rest of this listing is simply alphabetical. <br /> • School Buildings—Expansion, Renovation&Reconstruction. (See Article 12.) <br /> • Fire Station Central Headquarters—Replacement. (See Article 13.) <br /> • Police Headquarters—Renovation or Replacement(See Article 14.) <br /> • Carriage House (next to Lexington Community Center)—Determine Use and Renovation <br /> • Community(Affordable)Housing—Development and Acquisition(See Article 10(j).) <br /> • Conservation/Open Space Land—Acquisition and Enhancement <br /> • Center Streetscape Improvements <br /> • Greenways Corridor—Implementation. These are projects to link open spaces with trails. The <br /> major West Lexington Greenway Project—the proposed trail network west of I-95/Route 128 <br /> linking all Town-owned open space and the Minuteman Bikeway with the Battle Road Trail in <br /> the Minuteman National Historic Park via accessible trails—has been studied. <br /> • Hammond A.Hosmer House, 1557 Massachusetts Avenue (previously called the White <br /> House)—Determine Use and Renovation. This structure has been stabilized, but is not code <br /> compliant nor suitable for use without further renovation or build-out. <br /> • Hartwell Avenue Transportation Management Overlay District Improvements <br /> • Munroe School <br /> • Muzzey High Condominium Unit (former Senior Center), 1475 Massachusetts Avenue— <br /> Determine Use and Renovation <br /> • Recreation Facilities—A continuing need(See Articles 10(f–h), and 15.) <br /> • Roads—A continuing need (See Article 16(k).) <br /> • Sidewalks—A continuing need(See Article 16(g).) <br /> • Stone Building (previously the East Lexington Library), 735 Massachusetts Avenue—Determine <br /> Use and Renovation. This structure has been stabilized, but is not code compliant nor suitable for <br /> use without further renovation or build-out. <br /> • Transportation Mitigation—This is a continuing need. (See Article 16(m).) (Actions taken are <br /> often an element of road-related projects,rather than being solely to achieve specific mitigation) <br /> • Visitors Center—Expansion&Renovation(See Article 22.) <br /> The BoS, School Committee, CPC, and Permanent Building Committee will continue to evaluate, refine, <br /> prioritize, and schedule these projects for the next several years. Realistic cost proposals should be <br /> incorporated in the 5-year projections. The Town-wide Facility Master Plan, still a work in progress, will <br /> contribute to that process. <br /> The Community Preservation Act (CPA) <br /> The CPA is an opt-in, State funding mechanism for municipal projects which, while clearly valuable, may <br /> sometimes be crowded out by more-urgent municipal needs. CPA funds may be used for capital projects <br /> proposed by municipal and non-municipal entities within the four categories of Community Housing, <br /> Historic Resources, Open Space, and Recreational Use as provided in the enabling Act. This separate pool <br /> of money can help accomplish some of our Town's traditional needs, but only those that fall within the <br /> limited purposes of the Act. (See Article 10(a–j).) <br /> On March 6, 2006, Lexington voters approved adopting the CPA for our Town at the level of a <br /> 3% surcharge on local property taxes. <br /> In addition to the funds provided by that surcharge on municipal taxpayers, the CPA provides a process <br /> by which all municipalities that have adopted the Act are eligible for supplemental State funding provided <br /> from surcharges on the transaction fees charged by the State's Registries of Deeds. Those fee surcharge <br /> amounts are transferred to the State's Community Preservation Act Trust Fund (CPATF) from which the <br /> State supplemental funding is distributed according to a formula based on each municipality's <br /> prior–fiscal-year's property-tax surcharges. The State supplement can theoretically be as high as a 100% <br /> match to each municipality's own surcharge revenue, but the percentage is not guaranteed and has not <br /> 6 <br />