Laserfiche WebLink
Joint Meeting of Selectmen and School Committee <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />Ms. Fields presented town profiles and findings from Action, Arlington, Bedford, Concord, <br />Natick, Needham, Newton, Wellesley, and Westford and followed this analysis with comparable <br />data points from Lexington. Categories included: total population; school population; Health and <br />Human Services programs; clinical staff numbers; program types; if referral services are <br />provided; and if the town has established a mental health coalition. <br />Different models and approaches emerged in this analysis. Each town has developed programs <br />tailored to fit its individual needs. For example, Ms. Fields noted that Acton does not employ <br />clinical staff but does have a Youth Center that serves its relatively large youth population. That <br />facility was originally funded privately. Arlington has a staffed mental health clinic and a youth <br />counseling center funded by an Enterprise Fund/fee for services model. Acton, Arlington, <br />Natick, Needham, and Newton all have mental health coalitions. Seven of the towns offer mental <br />health referral services, using the William James interface that “spans the lifecycle.” Most <br />referral programs, if not all, started with the help of matching funds but eventually came under <br />the Town/School funding model. All towns except one continue to use the William James <br />program; the lone town that dropped out now wants to return. <br />Lexington, compared to other towns, has a large school-to-total population ratio; it has no mental <br />health coalition and no third party referral services but it does have a well-developed Human <br />Services department with 5 clinical staff/ 4+ non-clinical staff. This staff provides assistance for <br />seniors, youth, veterans, and those in need of public transportation services. Ms. Fields <br />emphasized that Lexington does provide crisis intervention and that an effort has now begun to <br />establish a mental health task force/coalition. <br />Ms. Fields reported that in 2008, the Human Services Committee recognized Lexington had no <br />designated Youth department. Since then, additional staff have been hired to provide a safety net. <br />However, demands on the Human Services department continue to grow: Since 2015, the <br />number of seniors requesting assistance has increase by 40%; the non-senior category has risen <br />20%; and the number of residents seeking mental health and support services has increase 129%. <br />Human Services recognizes that it is critical to work collaboratively in order to meet these <br />demands; additional staff will probably be needed over time to expand capacity. More parenting, <br />psycho-educational, and other complementary/supplementary programs are needed. It was noted <br />that 340 people recently participated in a program called “The Secret Life of Teens.” <br />Charlotte Rodgers, Director of Human Services, reviewed the four-step integrated mental health <br />program Lexington now follows: identification, intervention, prevention, and post-vention. The <br />CHNA15 grant will increase the ability to provide more prevention activities. Mr. Rodgers noted <br />that one common factor in towns with effective mental health programs is a strong Parks and <br />Recreation department. <br />Melissa Interess, Assistant Director of Senior Services, presented a summary of “Challenges and <br />Opportunities” sorted into three key categories: Supportive Mental Health Services; <br />Interdepartmental Communication; Education and Training. Those three categories were then <br />broken down into “areas staff can address/impact” and “challenges the Town might not easily <br /> <br />