Laserfiche WebLink
Selectmen – April 23, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />residents care deeply about. Ms. Barry asked Mr. Pinsonneault, Public Works Director, to extend <br />the Board’s congratulations to Mr. Beaudoin. <br />2018 Annual Town Meeting Article Positions and Presenters <br /> Revised motion, Article 16i <br />Carolyn Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager for Finance said the entire amount of $1.1M no <br />longer needs to be bonded since unexpended funds from completed projects can be applied, <br />leaving $73,479 still to be borrowed. This re-allocation has been reviewed and approved by <br />Bond Counsel. <br />Ms. Kosnoff noted that, as a result of the Municipal Modernization Act, unexpended funds can <br />now be regularly used to pay down debt service. Staff would like to discuss and propose a policy <br />to this effect so that such reallocations would only require Selectmen approval in the future. <br />David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee member, noted there has been an informal rule <br />that the source of unexpended funds should match the category to which it will be reallocated. <br />Ms. Kosnoff said the unexpended funds are from a variety of General Fund Town and School <br />projects. Staff felt that it would be easier to track if all the funds were reallocated to a single <br />purpose. <br />All Board members remained supportive of 16i with the revised motion. <br />Ms. Barry reviewed the Annual Town Meeting articles to be addressed that night: Article 16— <br />Appropriate for Municipal Capital Projects and Equipment sub-items that were not under the <br />Consent Agenda (b, c, e, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q); Article 20—Appropriate for Public Facilities <br />Capital Projects sub-item (a, d, f, g); Article 19—School Capital Projects; Article 25—Rescind <br />Prior Borrowing Authorizations; Article 29—Appropriate for Prior Years’ Unpaid Bills; Article <br />30—Amend FY2018 Operating, Enterprise, and CPA Budgets; Article 31—Appropriate for <br />Authorized Capital Improvements. <br />Mr. Pato voted against approval of Article 20f, saying he agreed with the two finance <br />committees’ analysis. Mr. Pato believes the Community Center Expansion should be discussed <br />by Town Meeting but the request goes beyond what should be done, given the addition of <br />Visitors Center project and the overall pressures on the Capital Plan. Mr. Pato would like a <br />public/private partnership funding model to be established before more funds are expended on <br />design. <br />Ms. Hai also voted against recommending Article 20f, saying her objection lies in both the <br />reasons stated by the finance committee and the lack of clarity of what should be done with the <br />Pelham campus. She advocated for a re-establishment of a citizen-driven group to flesh out a <br />more precise and less expensive plan before coming back to Town Meeting for design funds. <br />Ms. Barry said two articles will be brought up for reconsideration: Article 21—Appropriate to <br />Reimburse Resident for Sewer Back-up; and Article 42—Amend Zoning Bylaw for Special <br />Permit. She asked the Board members if they were in favor of reconsideration. <br /> <br />