2018-04-04-BOS-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Selectmen – April 4, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Mr. Pato said his suggested edits predate the ad hoc committee’s most recent draft and mirror concerns he expressed at the March 7, 2018 Selectmen’s meeting following the ad hoc committee’s presentation on Article 45. Taking the proposed edits in order as they appear in the text, Mr. Pato explained his concerns and offered potential remedies in the revised language:  aii: Definition of Structures: Mr. Pato sees the issue of sidewalk jurisdiction as a policy question, noting that in the existing Special Act, jurisdiction over sidewalks is ambiguous. Given that sidewalks are a passionate issue in Lexington, he would prefer not to establish HDC jurisdiction over them. Chapter 40C, Section 8 of the General Act allows structures, including sidewalks, to be excluded from HDC authority; individual communities can determine which type of structures to exclude.  b: Nominating Authority: Mr. Pato has a number of concerns in this area. 1) He recommends that the length of term for both full and associate seats be changed from 5 to 3 years to encourage potential nominees and to match generally accepted term lengths; 2) Mr. Pato recommends broadening, rather than narrowing, the selection of nominating bodies; 3) Mr. Pato proposes that an HDC Nominating Committee be added to the current process and sees the number and identity of the appropriate groups as a policy question; 4) Mr. Pato added language that limits consecutive terms to three (of 3 years each, rather than two terms of 5 years each) to ensure turnover of permanent members; 5) Mr. Pato added language directly from 40C that allows the HDC to solicit nominations from the community at large if an identified nominating entity fails to provide candidates when called upon to do so; 6) Mr. Pato added language about how to identify quality nominees other those who reside or do business in the historic districts, in case no candidates are found that fit the primary criteria.  Section 6 Exclusions d (i): Mr. Pato has restored previous language about public safety inspections because he feels they are best done by the Building Inspector rather than by two Public Safety staff members (from the Health and Fire departments) as recommended by the ad hoc committee;  Section 9: Powers (a): With the exception of the Center District, Mr. Pato generally agrees with the language about the HDC’s jurisdiction over building/structure massing in the historic districts. Because he has not been able to study the revised draft, Mr. Pato does not yet know if he will have additional comments. Ms. Ciccolo noted that Center Committee has not yet provided input and that the Selectmen have also recently received lengthy, multi-page comments from a resident. She asked that the resident’s comments be forwarded to the ad hoc committee for consideration. She stressed her appreciation for the ad hoc committee and the amount of thought and effort that has gone into the recommendations but, given the amount of input still to be processed, she would like to see the work continue until the community is comfortable and ready to support the motion. Ms. Barry said her understanding is that discussion of Article 45 is on the Center Committee’s agenda for later in the week.