Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-03-13 BOS Packet - Released SELECTMEN'S MEETING Monday, March 13, 2017 Selectmen's Meeting Room 7:00 PM AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments are allowed for up to 10 minutes at the beginning of each meeting. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes for comment. Members of the Board will neither comment nor respond, other than to ask questions of clarification. Speakers are encouraged to notify the Selectmen's Office at 781-698-4580 if they wish to speak during public comment to assist the Chairman in managing meeting times. SELECTMAN CONCERNS AND LIAISON REPORTS TOWN MANAGER REPORT ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION 1. Update:Bikeway Signage Project(15 min.) 7:10 p.m. 2. ATM 2017 Warrant Article Update:Article 37 -Amend General By-Laws -Trees (15 7:25 p.m. min.) 3. ATM 2017 Warrant Article Update:Article 45 -Amend Zoning Bylaw-Balanced 7:40 p.m. Housing Developments-Citizen's Article(10 min.) 4. Proposed Local Acceptance Statutes from Municipal Modernization Legislation(20 7:50 p.m. min.) 1. Speed Limit Regulations (Sections 193-194): David Kucharsky, TSG 2. Revolving Funds and PEG Special Revenue Fund 5. Update:Article 28 of ATM 2016 - Chapter 59 Section 2D of MGL(5 min.) 8:10 P.M. 6. Article Positions & Presenters ATM 2017 & STM 2017-1 (5 min.) 8:15 p.m. 7. Review Selectmen Liaison Assignments (10 mins) 8:20 p.m. 8. Future Board of Selectmen Meeting Dates July-December 2017 (5 mins) 8:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Water& Sewer Commitments &Adjustments 2. Approve Minutes & Executive Session Minutes - September 2016 3. Approve Tax Bill Inserts 4. Approve One-Day Liquor License-Lexington Historical Society 5. Use of the Battle Green- Historical Society-Battle Re-Enactment EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Exemption 3: Collective Bargaining Update- Crossing Guard Union(15 min.) 8:40 p.m. 2. Exemption 6:Purchase of Real Estate- Community Center Parking Lot and 8:55 p.m. Adjacent Land (15 min.) ADJOURN 1. Anticipated Adjournment 9:10 P.M. The next regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen is scheduled for Monday, March 20 at 6:00 p.m. in the Selectmen Meeting Room, 1625 Massachusetts Avenue. Hearing Assistance Device.s Available on Repast �� �� � All agenda time and the order of items are approximate and subject to change. Recorded by LeWedia AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update: Bikeway Signage Project (15 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: David Kucharsky,Assistant Planner, Beth Isler, Toole Design I.1 SUMMARY: Staff update. No vote requested for this agenda item. Working with the Toole Design Group and members of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, design plans have been completed that identify the type and location of wayfinding and regulatory signs placed on and in the vicinity of the Bikeway. The actual fabrication and installation of the signage will be put out to bid in the next month or so, utilizing CPA funds that were approved by the 2016 Town Meeting. The plan is to have the signage installed this summer/fall. This work does not include the more detailed interpretive signs and kiosks but those locations have been identified on the plans for future installation. SUGGESTED MOTION: NA FOLLOW-UP: Project to be bid in April-May DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 7:10 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D Bikeway Sign age e Q'nm. Presentation �Op AMEQ O 1713 2 c wcrory y O v i� /f, SlJdvi 394 tIflkV) th9� Ol0 b 140� ^u r- w ------------- ------------- f r w / r� � r l O A w W w r H w ......... wrn ------------- ------------- w 0 Epp AMEQ 2 713ron Z ,,,,,,,,, ? iv Ord sweva 3�a nv� 0 N W O rd m y t'g Ms A r N cd F+� o a� �:; 4-4 Cd Ar., rn cd _ P cd C) cd �' �' < R cd O O 0 Z CV) o � � cu 4 � pq � � W � o � H .15 �' .... ......... c� c�3 CS3 OQ ------------- Epp AMEQ 2� 13ron Z 2` O h =J s r r ri 0 nu` l V � r 3 I� A rn F�1 in u" � a .... W ... O a W cu to H A O to [-4 1Op AMEQ, 2� a 713ron Z O h =J O v 'd sweva 3�a nv� 0 tIN Ol0 laN� �E-4`J V W O �y a W � a � ill[ i1Wi, ��`" UIIIIUUlUUU1llll11ll1U11U11UU1ll11llDll1U1ll1D1llyll11ll111N10D�DDaVll1�1)�DD11�))�1)�DDaVll1�1)�DD11D1�11D�1J1J11D1111D11DD1lDDDDD»JJJ111111111111111111�JJJ1J1J�y1�1A»u11111 A " = � w F�1 `. . w . w � N O W 0 0 ...............„„ �y +�rtii«ri� rttnttrrt�rrrrttrittt�rlonn��toitl�llllliititilll�n�llirrtt�ltltrr�rrrrrrtti�tlllllititt»ttl�oi%Illlil����olillliloillil�ilil»���i><�o�iio»��»»»rrr�a�talallia, w ����� ���� t 1111�11r 1 � ll�l,tlll�rt�l�llllllllt�t,.l><11111i><»r�111111»11111111I<�lll»���i»�»»»»>rrr 1 ..��� rairrrrrmrr�aiui!w;:�awurr�rrr�Urlr �r/iw✓( ul�........... ,rrrr W !/) J 0 W F-1 N ........, .Q r .................................................."I'll .............. AMEQ 1713 ol 1w— E-4 ............... ............................................... 0 ------------- ............................ ................................ .............. ...........arow///// 0 U 4-A r-I 1-4 4-0 0 r. tr. n0 0 N-00, .,tP 4 .,40) :> vi 1-4 0 U 0 0 ro '� '� `� °� E-4 rn 4-4 4-1 4-4 4-4 4-1 4-4 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) EO CNJ r--1 CNJ CO CNJ CY) ............ ............................................... Ill`I / 9 � r iz orh In a w J IIIJJllllllllllllr»�J»,» „,rrrri1111N11JJJI11111JJJJ)J��I b,O I� C3 C W aw n" 0 ttt IS � a � iiiii�u�ui�u' � IIIIII.IIIIII IIIIII �IU IIIIII �. r i r ............... ............ ............... ............... ............... AMEQ 1713............... ti ............... ................ Z ............... ol 1w- ................ ............... ............... E-4 ............... -------------- .................................. ............................... /m/e E-4 En E-4 En E-4 N-00, rcl 0 rd CM ro rQ 0 4-4 4-4 0 a)r--4 0 4-0 4-0 rcl rX ............................................... ................................................ ............. E-4 2 o o ro 1> En rQ ro ............................................... ................................... ............... ...... ::1,11............ K4 9 cn pq AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: ATM 2017 Warrant Article Update: Article 37 -Amend General By-Laws - Trees (15 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Nancy Sofen, Chair, Tree Committee 1.2 SUMMARY: Ms. Sofen will present on Article 37 of the 2017 ATM warrant articles, which seeks to amend the tree ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: No motion necessary. FOLLOW-UP: DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 7:25 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D 4 mrnrarrrsd ibyk.wh Trees es; Backup Matorrinl D V"rra,eAnuwnr.dnuwnr:t Backup Matorrinl AMEND GENERAL BYLAWS- TREES MOTION: That Chapter 120 of the Code of Lexington, Trees, be amended as follows. The referenced tables are attached to the report of the Tree Committee on this article, a copy of which is on file with the Town Clerk and the Tree Committee. 1. By adding a new definition to § 120-3, reading in its entirety as follows: REPLACEMENT INCH - the unit used when determining mandated replanting, which shall be calculated using the Replacement Inch Calculation Table, an addendum to the Lexington Tree Manual. 2. By deleting sections C.(1) and C.(2) of§120-8 in their entirety, and substituting therefor the following: C. Mitigation.A protected tree shall not be removed unless at least one of the following provisions is satisfied: Replanting of trees: such replanting shall be on the basis of one inch of caliper of new tree(s) for each replacement inch of DBH of tree(s) removed except, to encourage the planting of large shade species, for each replanted tree listed in the Recommended Large Shade Trees list of the Lexington Tree Manual [Section V.B.S] shall be on the basis of 1/2 inch of caliper of new tree(s) for each replacement inch of DBH of tree(s) removed. Each replanted tree must have a minimum caliper of three inches. The replanting shall occur no later than 12 months after completion of the construction work, either on applicant's land or on land abutting applicant's land with express approval of the owner of such abutting land; IA.ineided 'I.18 2013 A`11.'M by Art. 'IQ 1 (2) Contribution into the Lexington Tree Fund, provided such fund is annually reauthorized, or otherwise to the surplus revenue of the Town: such contribution shall be $100 per replacement inch of protected tree or Town tree removed not already mitigated as per Subsection C(1); or JA.i,n,ided 'I 3 2004 A."]I:"M by Art. 'I4, 4 4...2005. "]I:"M by Art. 161 1 3. By deleting section D of§120-8 in its entirety,and substituting therefor the following: D. Trees not removed. Trees that are to be left on the site must be protected as specified in Section VIIIB in the Tree Management Manual. J .dded 4-4-2007 ."]I:"M by Ark::. 'L'31 4. By addition of section F of§120-8, reading in its entirety as follows: F. Maintenance of Protected and Replanted Trees. (1) Protected Trees: Each Protected Tree retained shall be maintained in good health for a period of no less than twenty-four (24) months from the date of Final Inspection, or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy if applicable. Should such tree die within this twenty-four (24) month period, the owner of the property shall be required to provide mitigation consistent with the requirements for the removal of a Protected Tree as contained herein within nine (9) months from the death of the original tree. (2) Replanted Trees: All new trees replanted to mitigate the removal of Protected Tree(s) shall be maintained in good health for a period of no less than twenty-four (24) months from the date of planting. Should such tree die within this twenty-four (24) month period, the owner of the property shall be responsible for replacing the tree with a tree equal to or greater than the size of the original replacement tree at the time of planting; such tree shall be planted within nine (9) months of the death of the original replacement tree. 2 ADDENDA TO THE LEXINGTON TREE MANAGEMENT MANUAL REPLACEMENT INCH CALCULATION TABLE (an addendum to the Lexington Tree Manual REMOVED TREE REPLACEMENT INCHES LEVEL 1: Less than 24" DBH Same as inches removed LEVEL 2: 24" DBH and larger Four (4) times inches removed S. LARGE SHADE TREES Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum Basswood Tilia americana Beech,American Fagusgrandifolia Catalpa, Northern Catalpa speciosa Cherry, Black Prunus sero tin a Cedar,Alaskan White Chamaecyparis nootkatensis Cedar,Atlantic White Chamaecyparis thyoides (full size only) Fir,White Abies concolor Fir, Fraser Abies fraserii Hickory Carya species Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos inermis Kentucky Coffeetree Gymnocladus dioicus Magnolia, Cucumber Magnolia acuminata Oak species Quercus spp: including Bur, Chestnut, Pin, Red, Scarlet, Swamp White,White, Shumard (Swamp Red) and Black Pine, Eastern White Pinus strobus Spruce,White Picea glauca Sweetgum Liquidamberstyraciflua Tuliptree Liriodendron tulipifera Tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Yellowwood Cladrastis ken tuckea Consult the Tree Warden about other species of large shade trees to determine if they meet mitigation requirements. 3 4-j 'a O b,C cry }� O ` ,O •� � .+j �-' � o � 4-j •+J (� • N o .�-j b.0 b,0 C1� � bO O o � 4-j blo bO V N V ba bO 4 75 7 (� 4-j 4-j '� O -6j � O -6j ,� N c O :: '. rn m � m � m rl �I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I m 0 Lin N m m m Qm J m m m W N � n W W Lin — W L WW¢ N G LLI a N o N z W W � IIIIII�I�I�L� � LL Lin m � IIIIIII�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�IIp�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�uI�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�Ip�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�uI�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�Ip�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�,".� � uuul�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I W N 00 5 _ 1 'I, r,_,,, r---,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,� o Lin o Lin o Lin o Lin m m N N —A .--I �o�....... 43AOW3H S33Hi JO H3avynN W 4-1 4-1 4-1 :1 +' -�-j -N 4� O UO a� o o cup, I bO � .bO W ctj� u U) a a� � A � � p bbO V � O � :4-j blobOa� 4-j 14-4 C� � a o u • c� o � C7j, r^ V J O V � � o 4-j blo ', � Z o Ln a � � o � vJ \ bO blo p u u 0 bO b,cW-iiii 0 4-j 4-j blo • --� bO � A > O •� O 4- V 4) W blo O U 4-1 V bO O - -1 � V 4� � U O W 75 V '-" ° - bA AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: ATM 2017 Warrant Article Update: Article 45 -Amend Zoning Bylaw-Balanced Housing Developments-Citizen's Article (10 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Christopher Locher 1.3 SUMMARY: The Board will hear a presentation by Christopher Locher updating them on Article 45 of the 2017 ATM warrant on amending the zoning bylaw related to balanced housing developments in order to return greater oversight to Town Meeting. SUGGESTED MOTION: No Motion FOLLOW-UP: DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 7:40 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D A rtra kA,". Backup Matorrinl D Art 45 Bak reed V h)ur higTM Prresenrtationr. Backup Matorrinl ARTICLE 45 AMEND ZONING BY-LAW—BALANCED HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS (Citizen Article) To see if the Town will vote to amend the Zoning Bylaw related to balanced housing developments in order to return greater oversight to Town Meeting, or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted at the request of William Rhodes and nine residents) DESCRIPTION This article proposes changes to improve the rigor of the review process of BHDs that have multi-faceted impacts to the town, including infrastructure, traffic, fiscal/budgetary and environmental, which are in some cases outside the purview of the Planning Board. As a result, these proposals should be studied with scrutiny by a larger town-wide body more representative of the voters' interests before approval. In addition much of the balanced housing, town houses and smaller housing that have been developed using special or balanced permits are unaffordable by state standards. We believe if the current permitting trend is allowed to continue, it will negatively impact the residential, conservation, historical and economic environment of Lexington. PROPOSED MOTION That the Zoning Bylaws of the Town be amended as follows: 6.9.2 Applicability. A special permit residential development is a project in which one or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land are to be improved for use as a coordinated site for housing. No special permit residential development shall be initiated without first obtaining a special permit in accordance with the provisions of this section. No special permit shall be issued for a balanced housing development(BHD), as defined below, unless the preliminary site development and use plan for the proposed BHD have first been approved by vote of town meeting pursuant to and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 7.3 of the Zoning Bylaw of the Town of Lexington, Massachusetts for planned development districts. The purpose of the special permit is to provide detailed review of residential developments that have a substantial impact upon the character of the Town, adjacent residential areas and the provision of public facilities and services. EXPLANATION We propose these changes to improve the rigor of the review process of these developments that have multi-faceted impacts to the town, including infrastructure, traffic, fiscal/budgetary and environmental, which are in some cases outside the purview of the Planning Board. As a result, these proposals should be studied with scrutiny by a larger town-wide body more representative of the voters' interests before approval. In addition much of the balanced housing, town houses and smaller housing that have been developed using special or balanced permits are unaffordable by state standards. We believe if the current permitting trend is allowed to continue, it will negatively impact the residential, conservation, historical and economic environment of Lexington. E V 4� L V) V O 0 rq (n O m N O 2 U � c6 E E V) O V) C o > _ cn >, 00 c6 m M tv0 Q .�, -'-' DC� C c � N cn V Q � � � o E N O +-' -0W C) — bn O U_ _O cn V Q 4-j � co bn cNn � 0 •cNn � � N bn cn O �� a E 0 0 N N 0 ,� E � ,� O _ cn as-' a� OC —.0 E 0 E m cn N w - c6 co co +, Z '� m �— ate1 U � u aJ U V ,`�' O < 0 -0 c6 Q O JOB 4-J O V E •U .- _ L U Q U � c6 Q N 0 ._ S... c6 u Q Q Q a- U — � s O a� L _ N O Q o u Q.CL _� aA un m Q to : O b > :tj 4-1- Q O aJ ''' U W C6 J Q i C6 V .� ccO aA E +� '� C c6 o _ .V, O •- aA ,� O cc v ru Q t�A O cn — E O •L > (o .� 3: aU E 3 3 p � m 0 4-+ 12 Q I I I O I I L U Q cn U > Q DL 0 � � 0 V m bn L- c p L .Q' O •Ln < -E +-j — CU . : M CL (1) O 4--) O U O 0 p u >a� Q c m E •— o •_ U U O c m CAA '— ru c CD m -0 O O •� :{-+ s- 4-+ U V) 0 Ln -0 4-J Ln V •V) U O W ._ Z C) Z > U cn I coI I I � I I J I m •— ca a-J O E � O 4— a� o +.� W � V ._ (i) 4-J - U . 0 E cn QL —_ O cn 0 O Ql � � O O NO � 0 b ago u 4-J0 > O Q� � cn � " 00 O .+-' ca a) > V Q) O •-, tv0 Q� 0 -00 Q Q •� � .� c Q p p O " •w [6 cn c6 >- � C6 CO O •� O 4- � •� to � O - COc6 U a) � i N s 'i � s Q > O s E Q Q O p N O O .tn '� O m > a� . J O CL O > U •� o N _ E �, cn c6 c6 .� > c6 O Q � C: Q ^ , J `� to +� `� 4-� '> U W C6 ;� L o < > c� :3 c� c� +, •— •— CL aU — •� .� •�„ � :� a� � � s ago c� c� � a� 4 c� �..� CL s v� c6 N ca. �' o o � -0 v O Q N O = ' Q cn O aJ iJ CL O •U •U Co a- sCL CLQ � ps -0 CL CL OO — �UN U Q QJ s O � �o � U zOz c6 CL c6 c6 V J V C� m M N M > r-., -o o Ln ._ ,u� Q O o 4-aln N •N O � O ~ 4-al ns U O '''' "' +� 4-al � '� .� -0 ._ O c O � — `r' CAA _! -1-l - O a- N , y— cn � 0- 4--J . O ca ~ — u >. O O > > (1) aD ( D O -0 4- a) Q U Q (U a) C p cn O — r p +� — _ c� O : s- O � v (U O a) v L- =3 a) O ai c v v >, o Ln + c a, L- O c p u cn M a) a) v N N � +� ' ^ cn -0 O �••� 1 4 v � N � O N O O u i s- �� 0 � O c� O (u a) c < 0. 0) 0 Ln O \ 0 N V N i W N bn c� N O `n c� O � O O N c ` > CL N 'O O ( b0 N u O O O c z � v v o v � o _O vO ° -0 }' E c E N E > OO > N3 - O Ln , Q CL v pC > v (u E zO O > c Q v o O CLONLn Ln N� �O N a) (U �X + u cn r >. w C Q m - c O p 00 lC7 Gl CxD p O Q m m m C) r--i o o b- Ln girl 0) 00 fih O in rn L o o h c o h o m o ^ , 0 m w w O 0 m O' W m N :C 0 � Ln O W � omen O fil} fil} t� L en, V �� 0 N Q 0 o O 0 0 Q o Q N Q o o 0 Q c O� N I„n h u^, h h = ih fih -tn fill) 0 Ln fill fill ( ti EN �..L cTy.ti 0 0 tLO O . 0 O C1 O O O C O Lrl fil} in fih fin d` Qtl1 tl1 -t)- b. / p m pr-iry 0 C) Lr1 C) Lrl C)0 `� w C) 0 �o C) Om0 � Ln % N = 0 00 M* C) 00 0 r-i p bO C) m W (3) Ln Ln h O '� C/} in fi11 fill T m -(n -(n iJ7 1 ^� W V aj 0 4� 0 V, �, � a �, -Cu O vo- 0 L J-- QJ C D W J-- W ' (31 V) a u u 0_ cg (11 0 v) CVO •i c: E w " Q Q- _ Ln Ln V) OJ m o o C1 Fu RS -+ C'L Z . � © U vl G •- W c� aCA ._ > N C6 ti O tLO cn 4� 4-' •- 'S i w m Q u, - > E 'j imQ CL L V 0 ate-+ N � 0 a--+ N V V 4�+ c6 •— c� C( O V a ry m d- cTy.ti H O _0 6� c� O ; a V u ° bp N O O >, _0 vi O O •— a) p L bn � O � a1 Vru o •E �� W (/1 o � •V to � •0 >, 4O > to U • O c N �,��✓� 40 i R 00"0�riMRi ✓ /�1,�� �G//,lira, �➢, "" "," ;i, �� �� � ,,yYi�r� � w V��yJ f � a�. ,; �� 61J � ,�ap�s iij ""'i���Ir T ,/, ,�a" Y.,; � /n�i: i�/! ,.rl fi G r � ,✓ i� r ,,J �„.; W� / ,�? li,t�n� % ,�'6i',�%y �1 ,✓�. '�' �" .,,. i i �fa���hW/ °'�[. ,. ,,;:,,✓ 1 ,,," � dig)' r,';. ,:.I ,'��;i i ��� :� g%�r (r� IY, � i �1 ✓� �/'„ to l�/:lo,%re J �1.. �,I �r ui 1 y' � �, h ✓r � 1 r �, ��; ,iwq, / i, �� ✓, r('��j,�l��l!,U�Ir, �% /^ „-;. �, 14���t✓����j1xY✓Hi�i/�i��j 'J ,,,,. ✓9 ry�,. i� ' ��� �, 1 .,�0i`W� �rrr " �, 11G�� ��� ��:1 �yap��F��" r '` � � �`r/°„���„�,' `;ii,,;,; �, � �"il�r �'�°,f� �� Sr�!�Y / i' ��✓�N�M,,r/i,;�,r '�:% �J h �1������i� / 1 ;. / �' �" �� ��� ���fN� � i f �1����1� A���;o/ � i✓ hi l �" ✓ ,�� � �i� ��� "'7;� �ll�� l` " �, �� �� l���ll� /%d�1 % .,���x�Gw���nr��u�`�rOGyi�✓e/y„� �, ��i,. �%✓, ,`J T r � � ��r`� V ,� �+t°, a,�11�",�l l" � r iY ,' rl �� :�r mar ✓ w r �! � d i ✓✓ al Ntiii !� � �f fhh� 1 +i J i �' ^a,; i�'�`� 4�"'u,� ;✓�, a'✓"�� ';���u������, � ri�� r�." ,^�u�, � �y�ai ✓ ��p� r��'✓ IIj��6�� l���;-" %gym,: �? ,r ✓��,,. ���� ��s�'�m✓✓��',!� c'Mll k "„ � sairu � 6 pl',✓v,w�u�pw� i,. ll�7r 0,,; 1� �A,'�� 9��i^ i��,'�%��' 'a 6�, i �"" Wl+ ,�if� ��V �/ 1� �����,.: r ✓. 7 i": iiY' ,�.; �rAre��f U r �i r✓ y � 16 w iw:ar'm ✓ii �� �; � d � �m," V r ,��y�. �4, r, �lIh n � * .. , � �P �7%i ���✓�'✓ fi/ 1, � 'tl i�br„ V ir; �; � o@ilk,;' qi ,r, � ' r ��AJ��/r � «r� r. '"„� '"" rr'� r���„✓,✓rir��� i�i�,�G��� ��'r;�� J, a �-- �, �" � %' ( ,' 7d r ii" rd+a y" 1���,, �i /., �, '✓r�� J /i, t�„✓ � I ! 1, �""�,��,��t"� m�m ro� ���/i .+m2�Hi/,,,; N �' � � �'`, � � �iiYr�'°; +', � I";v✓q "4 �' �n; ✓ � ���r/� ,,,✓. I �r^,r /i afi!✓i� + r5 -�� �' r o� ✓ (iM�, ➢� s''. i rxi; �� �7 D w✓�W� U Ewa, i ( ✓ ilk rP qNu�`�fe ,�m N ���,'iu� ✓J ��I'�'i m(✓ � ii� � %/� .:. ,.�,�✓:,, ,.,��,��,,,,,,.., v,,,., �� . ,,,fir"a ✓� ;� r�� �,� �, �� � � � " �� � �, � �i ,y��' a u Y iJ 'r✓ ��,; ✓ i�"i or R r ��s, ��✓ �f a all, lm � 'NUJ" � �rvY(f,�:/,/( eat�e ifl J✓ r '^��'° ',�,"�' � @ '! �;� ✓�� /fiF, ,. :'�;, '7�i,,... � �.Ns r��i r /l� � fir✓ 1 % �,", ��.� � „�;' �,Ui,, W �vi, ��'�. �� "� � ,� � e�✓�a s�, /,!0� V'9 � �, w7. ,. �".� a" .� n/P�';��1✓(lll llki � � „ � :� i �a � � t»v ��� .. '.� ..;��� � Rlli✓!(t(�J:.:ieviir�/r ✓ ��� f ^'� � ,� n�i �� Y � � p � � ��� �� fi , so- jai iIII, Nf ,�'u� �r�✓ � a u Sri✓ �urlr 1;i �(� s�✓/� .mow lmimrM„,r<«,,, :me;,ua ,,� ,r„1;' ah4"� H✓� r � �"}s t✓lf,l � �y'� ,� �,,✓ .. °%�d �✓ ��; 1°��,✓✓"':;u'�dy+�,,a,�?�''�l 1 ��7..n�^ � ;p�' k"N .�uM� J, �,�r;a � "r � °'� �w w� �,�y rJ ���u > Nr'�,� 'iJ�'W I" hd's � 6 � ti rp✓ �� F"�� �,✓iH �� � ��Y", „M�!'�x (�,.� , lit�r✓g�„ �,�m � � ���rj, ���� �✓ � � �' "� '� i 0 iIV � ,mv.� 1 i,,i ,� Nf i 0 t, a � ppp �✓✓ mM,yPo��)NNf"'Ji i'✓+Y '"� +! lr `�^T �N'sF.ri��� F � �'" b � r� �H'�� �i� � �I"��, �) ' � �'t'�' �✓fNl � '3uiw "fl,�Il�fm yt J% �' ur,r d ,✓�`.� o R� i n.-„ ,i, i ,�'�:� � �i�G i;��� ,; .r'rd✓�;YN r� �1J �i 1 ��rry w,. ^lu "'�&" Lriamnm"wro�u� � '" �, �F ";,v qr� r ,ei r 1� ;.�� "���t��,✓ ��� �4a r "� �, ` �l j '. i ;9s' l �,j�y � " S, ;; 4n➢ {��ol� rim�ii r,, �,y �l �'r,� asa r ''�,7,� � � � � it 11 ��� i 7a I r �fd `�f,�/,r m� !� 41 �, u r iiw �a i r� ✓alf �l�f,, " � � �� f / r 4 a �;, � dc, � ��;;% of,N � �t � Ai ✓ � M �� „s, i �r,J����'✓,ii,,,, ✓ `��U�yj// �y�dwd�' �g w '°'i I tM��h�ii ym" '�'�n° •, �� w 1sJ i, � Ili ���vul�' %� ��j J��j�i�� �� �,rc � i;7 d%iw r, �i�; �ai�� Js l% ✓ ;��� ar t7 trr';,k.s �ar ,7 dl IV ,;�,.�✓s ni � -""�'"'��h1'u,-/ i ''!�,,,���� f� e,a�W ✓i�tlY�,,,;. Y ���D iI/ir //6i �rq� "�� � �" � �,1; �r ui�i,";W,�v 1 awl ��"si ��q ✓ ,�„ ;; ✓" '���1N�a %+j� q r" , I/ �l�ai + r✓ Pf,�� f k ✓I ��, r�� ���f':;M ry ��, h �'�',�f 1N?!'�,, (if � Pri,}���� `i and /✓ �;� del �'il� m �ii✓' �',,�s��k4 r, rm ✓ ;��`�s1 ti:11 Q� 'c��` fr"�� RY iq� q�„�'t�'�1�" �/' y, Y7�i�. ��nY ����rr ;' ",,,� �� �If�a � o ✓�,,,p4� Mc,y/�u, �� ,,b� r PI�J�.Q �'� �� y,°w��w„,"a,s,„7"k�lau °, ����kA `����,I y"�I ��o� "'"�'d�� '1/ln �h 1 �/tl� �fiwr„�,✓„✓ �„���,,, ���,xpid'et��� lrs���m��� yQ' r���rtrt d rI� ����, "� i,% S�Yhd�/�a`�l � ,;� �� „✓✓YV ,�'sr�+ '{i '�iNly it �'f�'��aY �i n �� a�p� �;o��r r '/ii�i�i ` ✓Y 1 i ai r rah� "'r,�w j�r� ''uw�s �' r �; o r�� �r ""'i"', � oai� ,�� L'✓+�^, j����" iI �„ ,.,, � r I�"i+����� s� 7 �ti i �✓ „,,. 7�'� bup� ✓ ����Yr �� r ' i x r�,Mrrt i�r(I� ��,.�'o��,Vr r�r�i j�'N°i "(��'�v �� � �V y"y�ru I�'�(h4,%�v. ��""''1U1 ' �/11'F `�f � /�i;�;,✓ w� rrrw- 61,�d� l✓�i���a� m xrr������ �1� F,w,, �,.�^II���I,'U, �° m'"' v �� v o�ry f4q� ��l�x° w���'i� 1, ��f6r r ✓ A n 7 9 N� 4`�,)� �'� � a ill �� ✓ `� �Y/i ;" � r ;�s ,,:;,- �jl ��1<�(��'�+h�u.�'d +P� � y�, �&�d �M i ryi �✓ ,/��s,',��if�Yfs ����t�Mi �1 rgAN p / � �rj�r Ji ;9'��v �� K✓ ,v�k i�,: a�frl✓"�� '� "�lu fV„�� ��''��r�t� M�i'Gi r�1�jUNf / ✓ y�` �� '� ' �A� f rfl� sY ��a �l�. ^� d f, W �i� lv �1y' �� f "a /� any a N�� �j � F rirlln7(✓? H- O � N Q) co �— •� c u U- O v L CL � v � O 0 & N O uumm O u Ln •— O •V > �W c _ O � L +-+ N O w +.+ O V O f� � 41 O U N •N •� u v C v Q v N s CL N m L + . . c o O _� x c� uWWW -I—� O O u .v E p O 4 . ^� H > > N y � -0 i w ti W L Q) Q) � I i- N 0 Q) O �Ul) (Ar .. > N t� p Q� c0 w �_ s O c s CL O C a 4-1 p ._ p Q > O i S i w u O O }' N v, cn N •N (� � t� V CL O ap z c -a 'N 'H � N cOn an L v x }' b.0 dA c dA f0 u � O O ._ O co co 0 c� c O > V) cc -I-J O m -I—J V) > u O .� c�i� }, O � •— ca V cc °� .� DL � •— � cry � � y— O O •N to V c cc Ca � U Cl a-J CU 0 UO > c: U DC v � � �- � ca o — •— -0 N � � � N � � •— p ca cn 4� ca ca cn O w Q v cn � I U I I I O to L) N a--j O Uo C6 CL pC O O vi 4-, O X O D p O � M a) � _0 - O O ._ _0 blo > � `� •W N Q� CL J Q vi O� i cant O o p �' I� > bD m O c6 O � 3 CAA 4— m -0 -0 -0 CL O c V p U ate-+ .V M 0 ,c Q J i � I_f) RE� f6 4J •cn .N n , O N O 4-J C6 • • N tD.0 _ 4-J _ •O CL _ •x u NOOOO oc Ln o _ •� rn o = cn � o x O06 J O - r' 4..D -�• � rl J U cn v -�- o x E ':` 4--) (B J -I-J 00 0 . -c n- O W LL Ol 4-J W N •� J •� O V o •u � � o V U c6 � = cn U ° V > -0 ° � � O m �' ago ca c � - o C) N � _ OTC I d- _0 z 'v, m 0 Q AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Local Acceptance Statutes from Municipal Modernization Legislation(20 min) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Carl F. Valente, Town Manager; David Kucharsky, Chair, TSG 1.4 SUMMARY: Staff update on local acceptance statutes that were part of the recent Municipal Modernization Act approved by the Legislature. SUGGESTED MOTION: NA FOLLOW-UP: These local acceptance statutes will be presented at the 2017 Annual Town Meeting. DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 7:50 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D Moia)Roan V S6 Rog.arrdinrgTM gigna.ed��is its; ("'over Mom) D Draft Mamie>nr fdrirArt.8,w(138 Q�ylr /�a.rg..TMvrl;rxia nr. 5 Mop oQ 177s hC� APRILIT' I N 00ci MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Valente,Town Manager Mark Corr, Police Chief David Pinsonneault, Director of Public Works FROM: Transportation Safety Group DATE: February 17,2017 SUBJECT: Recommended Approach for Implementation of Sections 193 and 194 of Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016(Speed Limit Regulations) In the summer of 2016 the State Legislature unanimously passed and the Governor signed the Municipal Modernization Act. The Act created two new sections to Chapter 90 of the MGL: • Section 193 created MGL Chapter 90, Section 17C,which allows municipalities who adopt this section to reduce the statutory speed limit from 30MPH to 25MPH on Town-owned roadways. The roadway must be within a thickly settled or business district', and have no posted signs'. • Section 194 created MGL Chapter 90, Section 18B, which allows municipalities who adopt this section to establish regulatory 20 MPH safety zones. The intent of these changes to the statute is to reduce vehicle speeds and improve the safety for all users traveling on local streets. Existing enforcement efforts are not anticipated to change and, as with any regulatory(posted) or statutory(not posted) speed limit,voluntary compliance is key. The Board of Selectmen (BOS) is considering whether to accept these sections (2017 Annual Town Meeting Warrant) and have asked the Transportation Safety Group (TSG)to review and provide its input. In preparing this review,TSG reviewed guidance and information provided by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT). Section 193 MGL Chapter 90,Section 17C(Thickly Settled or Business District) In the case of establishing a reduction of the statutory speed limit on roadways within a thickly settled or business district, MassDOT recommends municipalities opt-in to the legislation on a town-wide basis to avoid potential confusion for drivers. This would allow Lexington to post appropriate signage at all ' MGL Chapter 90,Section 1 defines a thickly settled or business district as,"the territory contiguous to any way which is built up with structures devoted to business,or the territory contiguous to any way where dwelling houses are situated at such distances as will average less than two hundred feet between them for a distance of a quarter of a mile or over." ' Roadways which do not have posted speed limit signs are considered to have a statutory speed limit based upon geographic criteria as defined under MGL Chapter 90,Section 17. 1 major entry points of the Town to make drivers aware of the statutory regulation. The pros and cons to this approach are: Pros • creates global acceptance • can be implemented in a relatively short time frame • set number of signs (approx. 23 locations) to be installed and maintained Cons • concern with effectiveness (awareness of drivers as they travel throughout community) • perception of residents (potentially seen as "symbolic gesture") • potential for confusion on major entry roadways that already have posted speed limits The other approach is to opt-in on a street-by-street basis which would allow the posting of"Thickly Settled District 25MPH" signs on roadways currently governed by a statutory speed limit(no posted speed limit)that meet the definition of thickly settled or business district. The pros and cons to this approach are: Pros • increase awareness & improve effectiveness in reducing speeds where it is most needed • potential tool for TSG to recommend when evaluating safety requests Cons • majority of roadways may meet criteria, which could result in potential for signage fatigue & clutter • Installation and maintenance of additional signage Having reviewed both options and weighing the pros and cons,TSG suggests that the statute be adopted on a town-wide basis creating global acceptance of the reduced statutory speed limit. In addition,the posting of'Thickly Settled District 25MPH" signage on limited specific roadways is something TSG would consider as part of a larger evaluation when proponents or neighborhoods submit transportation safety requests. In addition to meeting the definition of thickly settled or business district,the following criteria is recommended for consideration in order to assess whether or not this signage be posted on a roadway. • Roadway Volumes • Pedestrian &Cyclist Activity o Proximity to ped/bike generating land uses o Existence of or imminently planned (2-3yrs) ped/bike accommodations (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, sharrows) • Ped/Bike Crash History • Roadway Condition o Width o Grades o Sightlines • Functional Classification (i.e. arterial, collector, local) • Unaccepted ways will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis (placement of signage may require easement) 2 Section 194 MGL Chapter 90,Section 18B (Safety Zone) Safety Zones are intended to be used in areas'where vulnerable road users are likely to be present. As this is a regulatory change, establishing a safety zone requires an engineering study per MUTCD and should conform to MassDOT procedures for speed zoning although it does not require their prior approval. Below are minimum criteria identified by MassDOT as well as an additional measure for consideration recommended by TSG. • Street should be adjacent to land uses that are likely to attract vulnerable users. (MassDOT) • Safety Zone should contain one or more areas that have potential conflicts between motor vehicles and vulnerable users that warrant a reduction in speeds such as crosswalks, driveways, or side streets. (MassDOT) • The minimum length of the Safety Zone should be at least 1/4 of a mile and it should not extend more than 500' beyond a side street unless an applicable land use continues along the adjacent block. (MassDOT) • Street has a crash history involving pedestrians and cyclists (TSG) When safety requests of this nature are submitted,TSG recommends using these criteria to evaluate whether funding of an engineering study is appropriate or determine if other measures are applicable. ' Examples include parks&playgrounds,senior citizen housing&centers, hospitals or other medical facilities, high schools&higher education centers,daycare facilities, high pedestrian areas and retail centers. 3 SUMMARIES OF SECTIONS 193 & 194 OF CHAPTER 218 OF THE ACTS OF 2016 Thickly Settled or Business District,Town-Wide Section 193 of Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016 created MGL Chapter 90, Section 17C which allows municipalities to reduce the reasonable and proper speed (currently 30MPH) on a municipality-wide basis. • Legislation only affects streets that are currently governed by a statutory speed limit(no posted speed limit). THICKLY • Sets the reasonable and proper speed on all Town-owned streets SETTLED within Thickly Settled or Business Districts at 25MPH that do not have existin Special Speed Re ulations. (PEED 8 p p 8 • MassDOT recommends this option to avoid potential confusion for LUMIT drivers. • Municipalities that opt-in to this legislation on a town-wide basis may 25, post signage at all major entry points to the municipality to make drivers aware of the statutory regulation. TOWNS WIDE • Municipality required to notify MassDOT of changes. UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED MA-R2-9B Thickly Settled or Business District, Street-by-Street Section 193 of Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016 created MGL Chapter 90, Section 17C which allows municipalities to reduce the reasonable and proper speed (currently 30MPH)within Thickly Settled or Business District to 25MPH. • Legislation only affects streets that are currently governed by a statutory speed limit(no posted speed limit). THICKLY • Municipalities that opt-in to this legislation on a street-by-street basis E TL EDI may post Thickly Settled District 25MPH signs at the upstream ends of 1 the street. DISTRICT • Municipality required to notify MassDOT of changes. . 5, MA-W 13-4 4 Safety Zone Speed Limits Section 194 of Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016 created MGL Chapter 90, Section 18B which allows municipalities to establish Regulatory 20MPH Safety Zones. • Safety Zones are the only regulatory speed limits that municipalities can adopt without prior approval from MassDOT. However, they do require MassDOT approval when placed on State Highways. • Per MUTCD, creation of regulatory speed limits do require an engineering study prior to the establishment of the safety zone • Study should be created in accordance with MassDOT Procedures for Speed Zoning. • Intended to be used in areas where vulnerable road users are likely to be present. MassDOT minimum criteria: o Street should be adjacent to land uses that are likely to attract vulnerable users. o Safety Zone should contain one or more areas that have potential conflicts between motor vehicles and vulnerable users that warrant a reduction in speeds such as crosswalks, driveways, or side streets. o The minimum length of the Safety Zone should be at least 1/4 of a mile and it should not extend more than 500' beyond a side street unless an applicable land use continues along the adjacent block. r SAFETY ZONE END SPEED LIMITPEED �120—iil a ZONE MA-R2-8 MA-R2-7 • Regulatory speed limit signs are required to conform to the MUTCD per MGL Chapter 85, Section 2. • If established in an area where a legal Special Speed Regulation has already been enacted, the Safety Zone should be terminated with a Speed Limit(MUTCD code R2-1) sign that corresponds to the regulatory limit shown in the Regulation. • If established in an area that has no Special Speed Regulation, it should be terminated with an End Speed Zone (MassDOT code MA-R2-7) sign. 5 Article 8 ACCEPT PEG ACCESS AND CABLE RELATED FUNDS MOTION: That the Town accept M.G.L Chapter 44, Section 5317 3/4 relating to the establishment of a PEG Access and Cable Related Fund. (3/20/17) Article 38 AMEND GENERAL BYLAWS—REVOLVING FUNDS MOTION: That the Code of the Town of Lexington be amended by adding a new Chapter 110 titled"Revolving Funds to read as follows: CHAPTER 110 REVOLVING FUNDS §I10-1 The following revolving funds are hereby established: Revolving Authorized Departmental Use of Fund Fund Representative Receipts or Board to Spend Building Rental Revolving Public Facilities Building Rental Personnel and Expenses Fund Director Fees Related to the Rental of Facilities DPW Burial Containers Public Works Sale of Grave Program Expenses Director Boxes and Burial Vaults DPW Compost Operations Public Works Sale of Compost Personnel, Benefits, Director and Loam,Yard Program Expenses and Waste Permits Capital Lexington Tree Fund Board of Gifts, Fees and Program Expenses Selectmen Fines Minuteman Household Public Works Fees Paid by Program Expenses Hazardous Waste Program Director Consortium Towns Health Programs Health Director Medicare Program Expenses Reimbursements Senior Services Program Human Services Program Fees Program Expenses Director and Gifts Tourism/ Town Manager Liberty Ride Program Expenses Liberty Ride and Economic Receipts, Development including ticket Director sales, advertising revenue and charter sales School Bus Transportation School School Bus Fees Bus Transportation Committee Expenses Regional Cache—Hartwell Public Works User Fees from Program Expenses Avenue Director Participating Municipalities Visitor Center Economic Sale of Goods, Personnel, Benefits and Development Program Fees Program Expenses Director and Donations (3/20/17) AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update: Article 28 of ATM 2016 - Chapter 59 Section 2D of MGL(5 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Joe Pato 1.5 SUMMARY: Mass General Law Ch. 59 §21)provides that"whenever in any fiscal year real estate improved in assessed value by over 50 per cent excluding the value of the land by new construction is issued a temporary or permanent occupancy permit after January I in any year, the owner of the real estate shall pay a pro rata amount or amounts...." In 2003 the Lexington Board of Selectmen voted to reject the provisions of this law. In response to requests at the 2016 Annual Town Meeting, the Board of Selectmen is investigating revoking the 2003 rejection. Mr. Pato will present an analysis of the potential additional revenue the Town might raise if the Board chooses to restore the provisions of MGL Ch. 59 §21). SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A FOLLOW-UP: DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:10 P.M. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Cl Stipp larnnxw iud t wx w sa.ssnnuwm:t on.n ow connstuctionn.hi Lox;n.g..gtonn. gxflr3bit Adopting Supplemental Tax Assessment on New Construction in Lexington To: Board of Selectmen From:Joe Pato Date: 3/9/2017 1 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Mass General Law Ch. 59 §2D provides that "whenever in any fiscal year real estate improved in assessed value by over 50 per cent excluding the value of the land by new construction is issued a temporary or permanent occupancy permit after January 1 in any year,the owner of the real estate shall pay a pro rata amount or amounts...." In 2003 the Lexington Board of Selectmen voted to reject the provisions of this law. In response to requests at the 2016 Annual Town Meeting,the Board of Selectmen is investigating revoking the 2003 rejection.This note identifies the potential incremental revenue resulting in rescission of the rejection. An analysis of the assessments of properties issued a certificate of occupancy between Jan 1 and June 30 of each of the past 3 fiscal years suggests that there is a non-trivial amount of additional revenue that the Town can raise by availing itself of this statute. Number Number with Conserv. of CO >50% Total With > during increase Incremental Incremental Conservative 50% Fiscal Year H2 in value* Value (>50%) Revenue Calculation increase FY16 38 32 $ 24,943,900.00 $ 109,734.38 $ 94,210.78 32 FY15 66 51 $37,687,000.00 $ 123,744.23 $ 121,020.61 47 FY14 33 22 $ 13,498,000.00 $ 39,001.54 $ 38,511.85 21 3-year totals: $ 272,480.15 $ 253,743.24 Table. :Potential Incremental revenue due to 142 CO issuance - 1- 3/9/2017 2 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Staff provided a dataset of all Certificates of Occupancy issued for FY14, FY15, and FY16.The assessed as reported in the vision online assessment portal was used to determine assessed values for these properties.The value for the improvements on each of those properties in the fiscal year the CO was issued was compared with the assessed value of the improvements on the same property in the following year. When the value of the improvements on a property increased between the relevant fiscal years,this increase was treated as the incremental value due to the improvements related to the certificate of occupancy.The incremental tax revenue was then calculated by pro-rating the amount over the fiscal year and multiplying by the appropriate tax rate. In addition a conservative calculation is included in the tables above.This reduces the valuation of the subsequent year's assessment by 10%to account for general market price increases.This reduces the value and eliminates a few properties from consideration when the incremental value falls below 50%of the previous assessment. -2- 3/9/2017 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Article Positions & Presenters ATM 2017 & STM 2017-1 (5 PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzanne Barry 1.6 SUMMARY: Continued Board discussion regarding: • Assignment of Articles to Selectmen • Selectmen positions on Articles • Proposed Consent Agenda Articles Line articles highlighted in yellow require Board action so that staff can prepare the necessary materials for ATM. SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A FOLLOW-UP: BOS/Staff DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:15 p.m. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Review Selectmen Liaison Assignments (10 mins) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzanne Barry, Chair 1.7 SUMMARY: At this juncture,while we are reviewing liaison assignments, it may be timely to discuss what is expected of board members in fulfilling the role of selectmen liaison. There might also be some value in reviewing which boards and committees actually have official liaisons as part of their formal charge and which ones either need or don't need a Selectmen Liaison. I n goal setting and on our various workplans,the issue of streamlining committee functioning has been brought up regularly. Moreover,with many changes in committee composition, staff retirements, and board turnover, it is particularly relevant to consider how our various boards are functioning. Toward that end, this document was prepared to serve as a starting point for thought and future discussion purposes. SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A FOLLOW-UP: BOS DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:20 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D DRA1;V Q10S L kaisonr.Poky Backup Matorrkal D Q'OS L k.tsonr.Assigummits Backup Matorrkal Selectmen's Guidelines for Liaisons— DRAFT—3/9/17 Selectmen serve as official and unofficial liaisons to a considerable number of boards, committees, task forces, special project efforts, ad-hoc groups, commissions, and more. As the number of boards and committees in town continues to grow, scheduling conflicts inevitably occur and it becomes impractical for Board members to fully cover each meeting of each committee to which they are assigned. It is not uncommon for many of the boards and commissions to meet at the same time as the Board of Selectmen meet and/or during the day when individual Selectmen may be at work. Selectmen Liaison Minimum Guidelines: 1. The Selectmen liaisons are appointed to serve as a conduit of information between the committee and the Board of Selectmen and, where appropriate, between the committee and Town staff. As such their role is to facilitate communications, help the committee problem solve, and guide the committee accordingly. 2. BOS Liaisons should review the agenda and prior meeting minutes of each of their committees on a regular basis (ideally before the upcoming meeting) to keep current with the activities of their assigned committees. 3. BOS Liaisons should communicate on a regular basis by phone, email, or in person with the committee chair of their committees to help guide them. 4. BOS Liaisons should make an effort to occasionally attend a meeting of the relevant board or committee but are not expected to attend each meeting. Selectmen Liaisons Best Practices: 5. Selectmen should regularly connect with committee chairs of those groups to which they liaise to ascertain if the board or committee has any needs, questions, or hot button issues with which they need the Selectmen's special attention or assistance. 6. On an annual basis, Selectmen should review the charge of the committee with the chair, discuss if the committee is functioning effectively, and discuss the committees work plan or upcoming objectives. If the committee charge is in need of updates or modification, and IF the committee is a BOS created committee, the BOS Liaison should work with the chair of the committee to develop draft recommendations and bring the revised charge back to the Board of Selectmen for approval. If the committee is a by- law committee or Manager's committee, then further discussions should occur, with the appropriate body to determine if and how to update/modify the charge to streamline committee's functioning. 7. Prior to BOS Goal setting, it would be valuable for the BOS Liaison to connect with the committee chairs to which they liaise to gain insight that might help the Selectmen in bringing forth priorities of the various committees. ■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■ii■ii■ii■ii■ii■ii■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■u■ii■ii■ii■ii■ii■ii■u■u■u■u Board of Selectmen Liaisons, Etc. Barry Board of Health Liaison Board of Selectmen Chair Cary Library Trustees Liaison Council for the Arts Liaison Lexington Housing Assistance Board (LexHAB) Liaison Monuments and Memorials Committee Liaison Recreation Committee Liaison Town Report Committee Liaison Town Seal Committee Liaison Tree Committee Liaison C/ccolo Board of Selectmen member Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Liaison Cary Library Trustees member Community Center Advisory Committee Chair Community Farming Committee Liaison Council on Aging Liaison Greenways Corridor Committee Liaison MAGIC member Mass. Port Authority Community Advisory Committee member MBTA Liaison Transportation Advisory Committee Liaison Youth Sports Advisory Council Liaison Wednesday, March 08, 2017 Page 1 of 3 Cohen Board of Selectmen member Cary Library Trustees member Cary Library Trustees Executive Committee member Community Preservation Committee member Electric Utility Ad Hoc Committee Liaison Fund for Lexington Board Chair Human Rights Committee Liaison Human Services Committee Liaison Lexington Housing Assistance Board (LexHAB) Liaison Policy Manual Committee Chair Sister City Group Liaison Tax Deferral and Exemption Study Committee Liaison Youth Services Council member Kelley Board of Selectmen member Cary Library Trustees member Council on Aging Liaison Design Advisory Committee Liaison Economic Development Advisory Committee Liaison Fund for Lexington Board member Monuments and Memorials Committee Liaison Munroe Center for the Arts Board member Noise Advisory Committee Liaison Permanent Building Committee Visitor Center Permanent Building Committee Liaison Police Manual Policy Committee Liaison Tourism Committee Liaison Town Celebrations Committee Liaison Youth Commission Liaison Wednesday, March 08, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Pato 2020 Vision Committee member Bicycle Advisory Committee Liaison Board of Selectmen member Cary Library Trustees member Cary Library Trustees Executive Committee member Center Committee Liaison Commission on Disability Liaison Communications Advisory Committee Liaison Communications Advisory Committee Liaison Community Center Advisory Committee Liaison Economic Development Advisory Committee Liaison Energy Conservation Committee Liaison Grain Mill Alley Steering Committee (Ad Hoc) Liaison Hanscom Area Towns Committee member Historical Society Liaison Housing Partnership Board Liaison MWRA Advisory Board Liaison Scenic Byway Working Group Liaison Sustainable Lexington Committee Liaison Wednesday, March 08, 2017 Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Future Board of Selectmen Meeting Dates July-December 2017 (5 mins) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzie Barry, Chairman 1.8 SUMMARY: To consider the proposed meeting dates between July and December 2017: July: 17, 31 August: 14, 28 September: 11, 18, 25 October: 2, 16, 30 November: 13, 27 December 4, 18 SUGGESTED MOTION: N/A FOLLOW-UP: BOS DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:30 p.m. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Water & Sewer Commitments &Adjustments PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: David J P ins o nneault C.1 SUMMARY: Water& Sewer Commitments Special Billing BB 1116 ($19,928.00) Water& Sewer Commitments Jan 2017 Final Water Bills $ 3,401.72 Water& Sewer Commitments Special Billing BB1231 $ 7,111.32 Water& Sewer Commitments Cycle 9 Jan 2017 $242,073.91 Water& Sewer Adjustments as recommended by WSAB Feb $ 2,611.06 SUGGESTED MOTION: Motion to approve the above noted Water& Sewer commitments and adjustments. FOLLOW-UP: Treasurer/Collector DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D BOS fi I13-117 ("'over Mom) Department of Public Works Ins SPECIAL BILLING BBI 116 Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds FISCAL YEAR 2017 January 2017 WATER ($7,068.80) ($7,068.80) SEWER ($12,859.20) ($12,859.20) TOTAL: ($19,928.00) ($19,928.00) To the Collector of Revenue for the Town of Lexington: You are hereby authorized and required to levy and collect of the persons named in the list of water/sewer charges herewith committed to you and each, one of his/her respective portion herein set down of the sum total of such list. Said sum being: Negative Wineteen thousand, nine hun&,edtwenty-eight doccars andoolloo And pay the same into the treasury of the Town of Lexington and to exercise the powers conferred by law in regard thereto. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF SELECTMEN 3/13/2017 Treasurer/Col lector, Director of Public Works,Water/Sewer Billing Town of Lexington a " th Department of Public Works � Water/Sewer Division 201 Bedford Street Lexington, MA 02420 ACCREDITED AGENCY Town of Lexington Board of Selectmen 1625 Massachusetts Avenue Lexington, MA 02420 January 13, 2017 Dear Members of the board, Special Bill Bun BB1116 is a special billing intended to correct an under billing in the Section 2 bill run FA0217. Staff misinterpreted the reading of a new 4" meter at Youville Place which reads in 1,000 cubic feet resulting in an under billing. Steps have been taken to ensure that this error will not be repeated in i the future. However this special billing was sent before you two times in error. This commitment negates the second vote.Thank you. Sincerely, Robin Fullf'ord Utility Manager Department of Public Works arcs "' Town of Lexington t� a Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds FISCAL YEAR 2017 "N �* JANUARY 2017 Final Water Bills WATER $2,013.20 $2,013.20 SEWER $1,388.52 $1,388.52 TOTAL: $3,401.72 $3,401.72 To the Collector of Revenue for the Town of Lexington. You are hereby authorized and required to levy and collect of the persons named in the list of water,/sewer charges herewith committed to you and each one of his/'her respective portion herein set down of the sum total of such list. Said sum being. Three t Dusan four hundre one dollar an, 721jo a And pay the some into the treasury of the Town of Lexington and to exercise the powers conferred by law in regard thereto. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF SELECTMEN 3/13/2017 Treasurer/Collector, Director of Public Works, Water/Sewer Billing Department of Public Works 177E Town of Lexington Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds FISCAL YEAR 2017 AMOrr M February Special Billing N BB 1231 SPECIAL 0 LS GRA)46T TA February 2017 WATER $6,683.60 $6,683.60 SEWER $427.72 $427-72 TOTAL: $7,111.32 $7,111.32 To the Collector of Revenue for the Town of Lexington: You are hereby authorized and required to levy and collect of the persons named in the list of water/sewer charges herewith committed to you and each one of his/her respective portion herein set down of the sum total of such list. Said sum being: Seven thousancC one hundred eleven doffiars and321100 And pay the some into the treasury of the Town of Lexington and to exercise the powers conferred by law in regard thereto. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF SELECTMEN 3/13/17 Treasurer,/Collector, Director of Public Works, Water/Sewer Billing Department of Public Works Town of Lexington ((@111' 2 Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds FISCAL, YEAR 2017 MAW January 2017 Cycle 9 Billing CYCLE�9 GRAND TOTALS January 2017 WATER $234,826-66 $234,826.66 SEWER $2,141.20 $2,141.20 FEE FOR BEDFORD $5,106.05 $5,106.05 TOTAL: $242,073.91 $242,073.91 To the Collector of Revenue for the Town of Lexington: You are hereby authorized and required to levy and collect of the persons named in the list of water/sewer charges herewith committed to you and each one of his/her respective portion herein set down of the sum total of such list. Said sum being. Two hundred forty-two thousand, seventy-three dollars and gilloo And pay the same into the treasury of the Town of Lexington and to exercise the powers conferred by law in regard thereto. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF SELECTMEN 3/13/17 Treasurer/Collector, Director of Public Works, Water/Sewer Billing M FY2017 arts ADJUSTMENTS TO WATER/SEWER AS RECOMMENDED BY THE WATER AND SEWER ABATEMENT BOARD xry FEBRUARY ADJUSTMENTS • TREET WATER SEWER TOTAL 0100254500 83 Pleasant Street $2,263.72 $2,263.72 844101 2016 0300742800 70 Reed Street $83.78 $263.56 $347.34 852580 2016 $83.78 $2,527.28 $2,611.06 THE SUM SET AGAINST THE ABOVE ACCOUNTS IS HEREBY ADJUSTED, WATER SEWER TOTAL $83.78 $2,527.28 $2,611.06 , „ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC.WORKS BOARD OF SELECTMEN 3/13/17 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approve Minutes & Executive Session Minutes - September 2016 PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzie Barry, Chairman C.2 SUMMARY: Summary The minutes of September 7, September 12, September 21, September 26 and a joint meeting between the BOS and School Committee on September 13, 2016 are ready for your review and approval. The Executive Session minutes of September 12 and September 26, 2017 are ready for your review and approval. SUGGESTED MOTION: Motion to approve the minutes of September 7, September 12, September 21, September 26 and a joint meeting between the BOS and School Committee on September 13, 2016. Motion to approve but not release the Executive Session minutes of September 12 and September 26, 2017. FOLLOW-UP: BOS DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D 20116 BOS kioptarutivV)orr Mhnites, Backup Matorrinl 70-1 Selectmen's Meeting September 7, 2016 A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on September 7, 2016, at 4:10 p.m. in the Selectmen Meeting Room of the Town Office Building. Ms. Barry, Chairman, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Ciccolo; Mr. Valente, Town Manager; Mr. Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance; Mr. Goddard, Director Public Works; and Ms. Burke, Recording Secretary, were present. Letter of Intent 171-173 Bedford Street Mr. Valente said the Board has been negotiating with the owners of 171-173 Bedford Street. The property has been on the market. On August 29 we reached agreement on the purchase price. He clarified that it is one piece of property: 171 is the address that the Town has and 173 is the address of the property owner uses. He proceeded to note the highlights of the Letter of Intent: The negotiated purchase price is $4,300,000. The owners of the property have accepted that purchase price. It is currently occupied by two entities: Liberty Mutual on the ground floor and until recently RCN on the second floor. We are currently in the due diligence period where the Town has an opportunity to survey the property and make a determination if the property will meet our needs. The due diligence involves two aspects: one, an environmental review to make sure there is no contamination on the site, and secondly, the Facilities Department is doing an architectural and engineering review to assess the building again for Town needs. Our due diligence period goes through our Special Town Meeting, September 21. During this period the broker for the property will stop marketing the property as the Town has exclusive right to purchase the property. If Town Meeting approves the purchase, the Town has 5 days to sign the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Town Counsel is currently drafting the P & S. Ms. Barry asked about the provision on"Publicity and Confidentiality" on page 3 of the Letter of Intent. She indicated people seem confused about this provision. Mr. Valente explained to the attorneys for the seller that in government, everything is public. They understood we could not keep this Letter of Intent private. It would go not only to boards and committees but the meeting agenda packet on the website which is available to the public. Ms. Ciccolo was concerned about the short timeline from Town Meeting to when we have to execute this contract, and when will we be able to see this at one of our meetings. Mr. Valente will check with Town Counsel on the status of the draft. Ms. Barry thanked Mr. Valente for moving so swiftly to bring us to this point. Article Positions & Assignments for STM 2016-5 Article 2 -- Land Purchase -- 171-173 Bedford Street--$4.3 Million.In addition to the figure in the warrant, Mr. Valente indicated there would be an additional cost of$200,000 in 70-2 Selectmen's Meeting— September 7, 2016 engineering work, legal closing costs and surveying so this would bring it to $4.5 Million. The Board supports this article and Ms. Barry will present to Town Meeting. Ms. Barry recognized Mr. Hurley, Chairman of the School Committee, and Mr. Goddard Public Facilities Director. Article 3 — Suplemental Appropriations for Middle Schools —Additions and Remodeling. Mr.Hurley indicated the School Committee took a vote and decided to indefinitely postpone. Article 4 — Suplemental Appropriation for School Facilities Capital Projects Mr. Hurley indicated this article leads to the bids for the larger classrooms and the way that it was bid was 5 classrooms with 6 as an alternate. The bids are based on the Special Town Meeting 1, Article 2, back in 2015. $3 Million Dollars was voted for the five classrooms or for the alternate 6 classrooms. The bids came in above the amount appropriated and the shortfall between the bids and the $3M leaves us $1,430,000 short for 6 modulars or, if 5 modulars, it would be $878,000 short. The Committee voted to request a supplement of$1.430,000 for the 6 modular classrooms: 2 at Bridge, 2 at Bowman, 2 at Fiske. The reason for 6 is that we need that much to decompress the spaces there now even without increased enrollment. Mr. Cohen asked if the $1,430,000 will be borrowed. Mr. Addelson answered yes. The question is how much of the supplemental appropriation will be sought at the Special Town Meeting. When Town Meeting approved $5,386,000 last December, it included $520,000 for design work on the Hastings School in the event the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) did not approve that project. It was also represented at that time if the MSBA were to approve funding of the Hastings project, that$520,000 would be available as a potential source of supplemental funds for the modulars if the bids came in higher than the estimates. We have a recommendation from the School Committee for 6 modulars at $1,430,000 to which we can apply the $520,000 that is no longer needed from the appropriation last December, to seek a net supplemental appropriation under this article of$910,000 in the final issuance of debt. Mr. Addelson is comfortable with the language in the motion last December that it is broad enough that it would allow the $520,000 to be used toward the financing of the modulars. Mr. Cohen indicated we do not have to mention the $520,000 at all in the motion. Mr. Addelson said if everyone agrees, that is the case. Mr. David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, indicated the committee has voted to endorse this article. Because of the compression which already exists in the elementary schools, we need the 6 modulars to address that as well as the enrollment growth. Mr. Kelley joined the meeting. 70-3 Selectmen's Meeting— September 7, 2016 The Board voted to support this article and Mr. Pato will present to Town Meeting. Article 5 —Appropriate Funds for Police Station Feasibility Study Mr. Valente referred back to the Article 2 discussion relating to the purchase of 171-173 Bedford Street. The plan is, if the Town is successful in purchasing that property, the first use will be as swing space while we renovate or rebuild the main Fire Station which will take about 16 — 18 months. Once the Fire Station project is completed, assuming Town Meeting approves that project, the property could either be used as swing space when the Police Station is renovated or possibly it could become the permanent home of the Police Station. Article 5 would provide funds which would allow the Town to evaluate both sites (1575 Mass. Avenue and 173 Bedford Street)to determine if one site would be preferable for a Police Station. The request is for $65,000 to do that study and part of that would be a traffic study for 173 Bedford Street for either fire or police as well as studying the 173 Bedford Street building and the existing Police Station. Mr. Kelley indicated he supports the intent of Article 5 but he is wondering if$65,000 is enough to perform program analysis for both sites Mr. Goddard said they tested what the market would require to be able to receive submissions on this. They will go out for designer/selection and through that testing of the market they arrived at that number which also has a$5,000 contingency. Their intent with the support of the Permanent Building Committee would be to solicit a designer who does both Fire and Police Stations under one submission. This will make the study more efficient. Ms. Ciccolo asked if they got to test the market for the traffic piece of the proposal. Mr. Goddard responded "no", but we do have experience as a result of what we have done recently. Mr. Cohen asked where the $65,000 is coming from. Mr. Valente indicated the staff recommendation is to come from the tax levy. Mr. Kanter, speaking for the Capital Expenditures Committee, said CEC unanimously supported this effort not only to update the space needs study but there are other elements that have come into play since the needs were identified in 2010 The Board supports this article and Mr. Kelley will present to Town Meeting. Article 6 —Amend 2017 Operating _Enterprise Fund and Community Preservation Budgets Fund and Community Preservation Budd Mr. Addelson indicated there are some minor revisions and corrections to the information in the packets and provided the corrected copies. We recently revisited our estimates of revenue that we carried into the 2016 Annual Town Meeting to support the operating budget that was recommended to and eventually adopted by Town Meeting. He identified changes in the estimate of revenue: 70-4 Selectmen's Meeting— September 7, 2016 • Property Tax Levy -- Our Tax Levy in the spring included new growth, a component of the Tax Levy, estimated at$2.5M. We are now comfortable that the number will come in at a minimum of$2.7M., a$200,000 increase in the tax levy. • State Aid -- The figure that we carried into Town meeting had an assumption of 2% increase over the previous year. This past June when the budget was voted by the Legislature, our State Aid came in a little more than a million and a half dollar more than we estimated last spring. The primary driver is Chapter 70 education aid which came in $1.46M greater than we had estimated. That is money that is available for any General Fund purpose. It is part of our fungible General Fund Revenue and is available for use for multiple purposes. • Revenue Offsets — The Commonwealth assesses us for a variety of charges known as the Cherry Sheet assessments and there has been some reduction in the Cherry Sheet assessment. Actually there was an increase of$10,000 but an offsetting decrease in revenue offsets of$300,000 for a net of$289,993. Each year it is our practice to set aside $300,000 to offset any potential snow and ice deficit at the end of the fiscal year. In FY17 we set aside this $300,000 for FYI for the snow and ice deficit which never materialized. This $289,993 is now free and clear to be applied for other purposes. The bottom line is we are looking at a combination of these three factors of increased General Fund revenue totaling $2,002,481. Under Article 6 the proposal is that: • $6,250 be appropriated to the Town Clerk's budget for early election voting. • $30,000 be applied to Misc. Boards and Committees for Vision 20/20 to conduct a Town Demographic Survey. • $22,460 for a supplemental appropriation to the Economic Development budget for a potential funding gap for the REV Shuttle. Under Article 5, $65,000 is to be appropriated for the Police Station Feasibility Study. Mr. Addelson proposed that the net balance of increased new revenue of$1,878,771 be appropriated into the Capital Stabilization Fund under Article 7. Moving on with Article 6 he said there are two housekeeping items regarding the Enterprise Funds: It would be to decrease the MWRA assessments that were adopted under Article 5 at the 2016 Annual Town Meeting, based on the final assessments that were levied by the MWRA Board of Directors at their June meeting. We would propose that those appropriations be reduced for the MWRA Wastewater Assessment by $45,233 and the MWRA Water Assessment by $28,961. These revised figures along with other components of the adopted FY17 Water and Wastewater budgets will serve as a basis for preliminary rate recommendations that will be brought to the Board next Monday night. 70-5 Selectmen's Meeting— September 7, 2016 Finally, under Article 6 there would be a proposed increase of$40,000 to the debt service budget of the Community Preservation Fund to make moneys available to retire a note that was issued last June for the final phase of the Community Center renovations. By not converting the note to a bond, issuance and interest costs would be saved. Mr. Addelson sought and was granted the recommendation of the Community Preservation Committee for the supplemental appropriation. Mr. Kelley asked what the balance of the Capital Stabilization Fund would be after the addition of the $1.8M. Mr. Addelson replied close to $20,000,000. Mr. Peter Enrich, Precinct 4 Town Meeting member, and member of the 2020 Vision Committee, further explained the Committee's request for $30,000. Twice the Vision 20/20 Committee has done community-wide surveys to determine citizen attitudes toward the Town, services provided, what things are important to them, what quality they assigned to things that are being done, and what their priorities are. It has been repeated every five years. Demographics have gotten into it recently because 20/20 has been looking at changes in demographics in the town and have identified some significant changes. In light of the demographic changes, it is important to renew the survey and correlate it with demographic responders. The timing has been guided by the fact that the Planning Board is gearing up for its next Comprehensive Plan and they would love to have it completed by the time they are completing their Plan. Mr. Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, indicated the CEC endorses the $40,000 retirement of the note. He also asked about the $22,460 for the REV shuttle. Does that represent the Town covering potential needs? Mr. Valente said one of the property owners who has contributed in the past has not yet made a commitment this year so this is in case they do not come through. The Board supports this article and Mr. Cohen will present to Town Meeting. Article 7 —Establish and Appropriate To and From Specified Stabilization Funds Mr. Addelson said there would be two actions taken: first, to appropriate into the Transportation Demand Management Stabilization Fund $48,621.58, revised from figure in the packet, as a result of a payment that we received today from Lexington Place Condominiums. The components of those payments are made under agreements with Avalon Bay, Watertown Savings Bank, Lexington Place Condominiums and The Inn at Hastings Park. The second action is that the residual balance of our revised estimate of FYI General Fund Revenue, $1,878,771, is recommended to be appropriated to the Capital Stabilization Fund under this article. Mr. Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee, indicated CEC is in favor of this transfer. 70-6 Selectmen's Meeting— September 7, 2016 The Board supports this article and Ms. Ciccolo will present to Town Meeting. Ms. Barry indicated they would revisit the Article Positions chart on Monday night so Mr. Pato can register his positions. Consent Agenda _ Use of the Battle Green— 911 Remembrance Ceremony The Lexington Interfaith Clergy Association has requested use of the Battle Green to hold a 9/11 Remembrance Ceremony on Sunday, September 11, 2016 from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Police, Fire and DPW do not have any concerns with this request. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 4-0 to approve the use of the Battle Green by the Lexington Interfaith Clergy Association on September 11, 2016, for a 9/11 Remembrance Ceremony 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.. Ms. Barry stated that the next meeting of the Board of Selectmen is scheduled for Monday, September 12. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 4:48 p.m. DOCUMENTS PRESENTED: Revised"Proposed FY17 Supplemental Appropriations at the 9/21/16 Special Town meeting: Sources and Uses" A true record; Attest: Pauline Burke Recording Secretary 70-7 Selectmen's Meeting September 12, 2016 A meeting of the Lexington Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, September 12, 2016 at 7:00 p.m.in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the Town Office Building. Chairman Barry, Mr. Kelley, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pato, and Ms. Ciccolo were present as well as Mr. Valente, Town Manager and Ms. Siebert, Recording Secretary. Selectmen's Concerns/Liaison Reports Mr. Pato reported that he was present at the well-attended and moving Lexington Interfaith Clergy Association's 9/11 ceremony on the Battle Green. Ms. Barry spoke to two items: First, she expressed thanks to Fire Chief John Wilson and Assistant Chief Derek Sencabaugh for hosting tours of the Fire Station for over 30 Town Meeting Members in advance of the Special Town Meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, September 21. Second, Ms. Barry reported that she and Selectman Ciccolo attended a Chairs Plus One meeting with representatives from the School Committee, Capital Expenditures, and Appropriations Committees as well as with Town Manager Carl Valente, Director of Finance Robert Addelson, and Public Facilities Director Patrick Goddard. The meeting was convened in anticipation of Special Town Meeting to discuss a timeline for preparations for debt exclusion votes for the new Hastings School and renovation/rebuilding of the fire station, including temporary swing space accommodation. Ms. Barry noted that the Hastings School project has received MSBA funding. Also under discussion at the Chairs Plus One meeting were the Lexington High School HVAC system and relocation of the School Department's pre-school (LCP). Design funding for LCP will be discussed at the joint School and Selectmen meeting scheduled for September 13. Ms. Barry foresees a fall 2017 STM vote on the above projects, the timing driven to a degree by the imperatives of the Hastings School and MSBA requirements. Town Manager's Report Mr. Valente noted four items and asked DPW Director Dave Pinsonneault to elaborate on the first two: • Mr. Pinsonneault provided an update on the recent water pressure issue in certain parts of town, most notably the upper Grove St. neighborhood near the Bedford line. The DPW sent out a mailing to all residents and posted information on its website to explain the problem and to ask for a voluntary shift of residential irrigation times. The Town also adjusted municipal irrigation times and has worked with the Town of Bedford to alter the time frame during which it draws water from Lexington. Mr. Pinsonneault reported due to these measures over the past two weeks, water pressure has improved in the affected area. In addition to the above efforts, a town-wide water system assessment will be conducted over the winter and DPW will host educational meetings to promote water conservation throughout the year. Mr. Pinsonneault anticipates another voluntary request 70-8 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 in the spring as the next outdoor watering season approaches. Discussions with the Town of Bedford about draw times and other related matters will continue. He will update the Board as needed. • The Public Works Department has been recognized by the American Public Works Association for its valiant responses to the extreme winter weather of 2014/15. Mr. Pinsonneault read the letter of commendation aloud in its entirety and reported that he and Marc Valenti, Manager of Operations, accepted the award on behalf of the Town at a recent conference. Ms. Barry congratulated the entire DPW team for recognition of its "heroic efforts." • Mr. Valente addressed the third item: Completion of the Lexington Center parking meter update, begun in March, will occur next week when 300 additional smart meters will be installed. The work is anticipated to conclude within 3 days. Mr. Valente said that one lesson learned from the first phase of the project is that the meter heads should be lower than originally envisioned. To that end, all previously installed meters have been adjusted so that the screens can be more easily read. Mr. Valente said he has received positive feedback about the new meters: patrons appreciate the 15 minute grace period for a quick errand, the option to buy less than an hour's time, and the ability to use credit cards rather than having to fumble with coins. • Last week, Mr. Valente, DPW Director Pinsonneault, Town Engineer John Livsey, and Representative Jay Kaufman met with MassDOT and consultants to discuss installation of a solar panel array along highway sound barriers where Routes. 3 and 95 converge, near Robinson Road. The panels would go on the highway side of the barrier and pose little to no visual disturbance to abutting residents. Mr. Valente described the artist's rendition of these panels as resembling jalousie window shades, tilted at an angle to catch the sun. MassDOT has conducted studies to ensure that panel installation would not impede the efficacy of the sound barriers. If we go ahead with this, it would be the first solar panel array on a federal highway in the country. If the Board is in favor of the initiative, meetings will be hosted to consult with the neighborhood and Sustainable Lexington will be brought into the conversation. Public Hearing—Flammable Storage License509 Woburn St. Ms. Barry opened the Public Hearing at approximately 7:13 p.m. Mr. Kelley recused himself and exited the room due to a conflict of interest. Ms. Barry recognized Fire Chief John Wilson who spoke in support of the flammable storage license. The quantity of cars (at the Manor House of Lexington—Pinnacle Park LLC) and the gasoline they hold kick in requiring a license, Chief Wilson explained. He felt there was no reason not to approve this. Referencing the application, Mr. Pato noted there was a distinction made between diesel and standard gasoline. Chief Wilson said the relevant difference in this instance is that diesel is less volatile. 70-9 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen approved the flammable storage license for Pinnacle Park, LLC, for the Manor House of Lexington, located at 309 Woburn Street, as required under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148 on a vote of 4-0. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:16 pm. Mr. Kelley resumed his seat at the table. Consider Board Position—Sept 20 Special Election Ballot for Minuteman High School Project Ms. Barry recognized David Horton, Minutemen School Committee and Treasurer of the Campaign for Minuteman's Future. Mr. Horton spoke about the importance of Minuteman Technical High School, referred to Town Meeting's unanimous support of the project, and asked for confirmation of the Board's endorsement. The upcoming vote of sixteen member towns on Tuesday, September 20 (one poll only in Lexington will be open noon to 8 pm)will decide the fate of a new $144M facility of which the MSBA is expected to contribute approximately $40M. Mr. Horton reported substantial public support for the project and said the local papers had helped get the word out. He distributed copies of a promotional flyer and a postcard that have been sent to residents, and noted a public information meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 14. Mr. Cohen said that although Town Meeting voted unanimously for the project, the struggle to get this far has been a long one. He acknowledged the value of local news coverage of the issue, applauding a recent Sunday OpEd in the Boston Globe by Dante Ramos that took Belmont to task as the only member town to vote "No" on the project. Mr. Pato said that, despite the good news of widespread support in Lexington, it was important to make the effort to vote, especially given somewhat unusual timing and logistics. He added that the Board has very strongly supported this as an educationally sound program and financially a good deal for the district, better than you are going to find with another approach. Mr. Kelley agreed with Mr. Pato, emphasizing again the unusual timing and logistics of the vote. Ms. Barry reminded the public that registered voters may vote absentee ballot by visiting the Town Clerk's office. The prevailing side in the election will be determined by a simple majority across the sixteen towns. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to support the September 20, 2016 special election for the Minuteman High School building project and to encourage the voters of Lexington to support this building project. LexFarm Operational Plan Update The Chair recognized Carol Kowalski, Assistant Town Manager for Development. Ms. Kowalski introduced Carol Goldstein of the LexFarm Property Development Committee, liaison to the 70-10 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 Community Farming Committee and LexHab; Mark Gabrenya, Board of Directors member and Property Committee Chair; and Susan Schiffer VP of the LexFarm Board of Directors. Ms. Kowalski reviewed some of LexFarm's accomplishments for the year and highlighted a few salient points from this year's operational plan. • LexFarm sold out its 200 CSA shares this year and initiated a 10-week CSA. • Environmental sustainability was increased by cover crop planting. • Major property improvements included: well pump replacement and greenhouse oil tank removal, installation of town water/sewer hook-ups, and design and budget for an onsite bathroom. • A strategic planning initiative was made possible via a grant from Community Endowment of Lexington. • Educational program development and on-farm events continue to bring the public to the farm. Ms. Kowalski then presented four key points from the operational and site plan: • LexFarm asks to submit future annual plans to the Board on January 15 rather than December 1. • Lex Farm asks permission to erect a temporary structure for events to provide shelter from weather. The new bathroom and the temporary structure both require notification and written consent from the Town Manager. LexFarm proposes a 20-day notification period for the structure since no notification period is specified in the lease. • LexFarm asks for continued access via the shared driveway on the south, 48 Lowell St. side of the property, near the farmstand building. If that access were to be unavailable, sole access would be on the north side of the property. • LexFarm is interested in erecting a fence and possibly reducing current curb cuts from the street into the property in order to separate pedestrian and farm vehicle traffic. Both the fence and the curb cut reduction require notification to the Town Manager and his written consent. The Board applauded the progress of the Farm and the efforts of all involved. The Town Manager will review LexFarm's plan and requests. Approve Plan—Minuteman Statue Restoration DPW Director Pinsonneault was recognized to speak to the matter. Subsequent to the last Selectmen's meeting, Mr. Pinsonneault convened a meeting between Daedalus representative Josh Craine; Michael Evans, a Lexington resident with experience in metals and preservation; Sam Doran, Chair of the Monuments and Memorials Committee; and Bebe Fallick, member of the Monuments and Memorials Committee. The different options for the statue were discussed and two areas of consensus were reached: first, the statue should be cleaned and, second, it should be repaired. A third area of consensus 70-11 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 was that there are two different ways to approach treatment of the statue that depended upon what"look" was desired: Should the statue look immediately and uniformly green? Or should the statue be allowed to weather over time to achieve an appearance similar to how it looks now? Mr. Pinsonneault asked for the Board's direction on how to proceed, saying that work would commence after next Patriot's Day since the window to act this season has closed. Ms. Barry clarified that the discussion on treatment includes not only the statue but the Minuteman Memorial as well. Mr. Pinsonneault confirmed that the approach chosen for the statue would be replicated for the memorial. Ms. Barry acknowledged receipt of a report/recommendation from the Monuments and Memorials Committee. Mr. Kelley asked for an accounting of the restoration budget and, additionally, what yearly maintenance costs would be. Mr. Pinsonneault recalled that the article funding was $50,000 which he believes is more than enough to cover the cost of either option. Annually, the maintenance price tag could be around $2,000, depending on the surface treatment chosen. He suggested that Daedalus, the consulting company, would be a likely choice for the semi-annual maintenance contract. Michael Evans, 1 Carol Lane, displayed a single page PowerPoint exhibit that addressed the question of whether to paint the statue or allow the patina to return after a time. He noted that outdoor copper and bronze looks after itself. If the statue were to be painted, as Concord's has been, the oxides must be stripped before paint can be applied. In the patina/non-paint option, Incralac material would be applied as a promoter to accelerate the weathering process. This method also reduces the amount of water that reaches the surface of the statue. Mr. Evans recommended that if painting is preferred the Board stay tightly associated with the process to stay in control of the color choice and make sure it is properly managed and carefully achieved. He shared Josh Craine's opinion that the statue is in excellent condition and expressed confidence in Daedalus to administer the appropriate level of care for the statue in the future. The only area of disagreement between Mr. Evans and Mr. Craine was on the matter of finish treatment. Mr. Evans characterized the difference between the options as taking the patient and giving him surgery or an amputation (painting option) as opposed to a Band-Aid and an aspirin (patina option). Mr. David Kanter, 48 Fifer Lane, Town Meeting and Capital Expenditures Committee member, who clarified that he was speaking on his own behalf, said he believed it more important to base the decision on the long-term health of the statue rather than on attaining an immediate, uniform appearance. He urged the Board to approve the patina/natural approach and added that painting could always be an option for the future, if the natural approach was not satisfactory. Ms. Ciccolo asked how long it would take for the patina to develop. Mr. Evans replied it would be weeks to months using a benzotriazole accelerant. It basically can be done very quickly. You 70-12 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 will see the green almost instantly, about to the level you see on the base of the Concord Minuteman statue. Based on Mr. Evans' response, Ms. Ciccolo determined that she preferred the less intrusive option. Mr. Kelley agreed, saying that one of his concerns had been the perpetual impact on the surface. Every time you remove something, you affect the natural surface. Mr. Pato echoed his colleagues, saying he saw no compelling reason to choose the paint option since the natural approach is less likely to cause harm. Mr. Cohen concurred, although he acknowledged controversy surrounding either choice was not likely to immediately subside. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the treatment method recommended by Mr. Evans for the natural greening of the Minuteman statue and the Minuteman memorial. FY17 Water& Sewer Rates—Prior Year Financials, FY17 Budget, Preliminary FY17 Rates (Presentation 1 of 3) Ms. Barry recognized Rob Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance. Note: Subsequent discussions of Water/Sewer rates are scheduled for September 26, when the public may comment on preliminary Water/Sewer rates for FYI 7, and October 13, when the Board of Selectmen is expected to vote on the recommended FYI Water/Sewer rates. Mr. Addelson covered three areas in this first presentation: Review of FYI Water and Sewer operations, billed consumption, and retained earnings; FYI Water/Sewer budgets as adopted at 2016 Annual Town Meeting (direct and indirect costs) and proposed revisions to the budgets which will serve as the basis for deciding FYI Water/Sewer rates. Clarifying that the FYI accounts had not yet been audited, Mr. Addelson reported that the Water revenue and expenditures line items both showed positive results, generating total surpluses of approximately $885,000: $765,000 came from revenues in excess of estimates and $119,000 was derived from lower than budgeted expenses. Revenue in excess of estimates was attributed to two factors. In the usage category, water receipts from the Town of Bedford came in $163,000 above expectations; Tier 3 usage generated $157,000 above expectations; and irrigation accounts were $433,000 above the figure anticipated in the budget model. One change to the proposed FY17 budget adopted at Town Meeting is a$28,961 decrease in the MWRA Assessment line item. Mr. Addelson said the MWRA Board of Directors adopted the assessment in June 2016. Based on the assessment, the FYI Water budget will be $10,738,891 inclusive of indirect costs. This represents a 7.1% increase over FYI or $715,940 in real dollars. The main driver to this increase is the MWRA assessment increase of 9.8%, attributable 70-13 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 to Lexington's share of the 3.5%increase in MWRA operations and Lexington's increased usage of 10.3%between calendar years 2014 and 2015. The FYI unaudited Wastewater operating budget also showed higher than expected revenues, generating a surplus of approximately $787,000 of which $175,000 is from under-budget expenditures and $612,000 is from revenue in excess of expectations. For the FYI Wastewater budget, one change proposed to the budget adopted at Annual Town Meeting is a decrease of$45,233 due to the MWRA final assessment approved in June. Based on the above, the proposed revision to the adopted FYI Wastewater budget will be an increase of 2.7% (or $245,194)which results in a total Wastewater FYI budgetpf$9,396,747. [Note Mr. Addelson's memo on the subject was corrected from the original during the meeting. It should read"a 2.7% increase"instead of"a 2.7% decrease". The above reflects the correction.] On a combined basis, Water and Sewer budgets will increase 5.0% over FYI 6. Mr. Addelson said that proposed Water and Sewer rates are mitigated somewhat by retained earnings from Bedford usage in excess of expectations for calendar year 2015 that covers part of FY15 and part of FY16. Since rates differ tier to tier, Mr. Addelson showed in a chart how each cohort would be affected. Data was provided re: usages for wet and dry years as well as a history of water purchases between 1998 and 2016. Mr. Addelson included a Water and Sewer comparison table showing data from the 56 participating MWRA communities. An accounting of retained earnings was included in Mr. Addelson's memo. Again, the Town of Bedford water purchases were the driver behind much of the retained earnings surpluses as were in-town irrigation accounts. Mr. Addelson noted the practice of maintaining a balance in the retained earnings column. He said it is based on the need for reserves to address unanticipated emergency spending and to cover revenue shortfalls. The funds also provide working capital for water and wastewater expenditures. He proposed that this practice continue and that funds in excess of identified thresholds be applied to mitigate rates or to finance capital. Retained earnings for Water as of June 30, 2016 are projected to be $1,725,000 and retained earnings for Sewer for the same period are projected to be $1,642,000. On the subject of water pressure in the Grove St. area, Mr. Kelley asked if Lexington is now delivering more water than its 25-year contract with the Town of Bedford requires. He wanted to know if it is possible for the Town of Bedford to take their water via Great Road or Maguire Road and eliminate draws through the Grove Street conduit. Mr. Kelley also asked if excessive retained earnings could be deployed to shield average users from rate increases of over 3%. It seems like we have an awful lot of revenue coming in and retained earnings are higher than what we have had in the past, he remarked. 70-14 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 Mr. Pato said he was interested in the same information Mr. Kelley asked for. He added that even though the MWRA has plenty of water right now, it is nonetheless affected by the drought. We as a community all need to be thinking about conservation even though we are not pulling water out of our own aquifer. Ms. Barry reminded the Board and the audience that Mr. Addelson would return in two weeks for the FYI Water/Sewer rate public hearing. Keno Application for Alexandria's, 335 Woburn Street Ms. Barry said the Board has been contacted by the Massachusetts Lottery Commission to comment on a Keno monitor application submitted by Alexandria's Convenience Store. This monitor would be an addition to Alexandria's Keno-to-Go license. The Board must respond within 21 days of receipt of the letter dated August 30, 2016, stamped as received by the Selectmen's office on September 6, 2016. Mr. Cohen said his inclination is to continue the Selectmen's pattern/practice of denying this type of application. Mr. Pato noted that the Board had approved a similar application from a private organization, the difference being the lack of public access. He added that there is one licensed,publically accessed location in Lexington that was granted permission some time ago. Even so, he expressed discomfort with an additional request. Mr. Cohen said that the single licensed location received approval before the law as it is now. Mr. Kelley agreed with his colleagues, saying he disapproved of anything that encouraged gambling. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0-to not support the Keno monitor application for Alexandria's Convenience Store and to authorize the Chair to send a letter to the Massachusetts Lottery Commission stating the Board's position. Accept Terms of the Merion Ritter Scholarship Fund The scholarship would be available to financially challenged graduates of Lexington and Minuteman high schools to pursue the study of Science (preferably Environmental Science) at the post-secondary level. Mr. Kelley spoke in glowing terms of Merion Ritter, saying she was extremely accomplished, deeply committed to numerous efforts, and that she embodied the volunteer spirit to the great benefit of the town. On motion duly made and seconded the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to accept the terms of the Merion Ritter Scholarship Fund that will be managed by the Trustees of Public Trusts. 70-15 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 Special Town Meeting—Article Positions At a recent meeting that Mr. Pato was unable to attend, members of the Board of Selectmen reviewed their individual and collective positions on Special Town Meeting articles. The item was repeated on this night's agenda so that Mr. Pato could make known his positions on the articles. Mr. Pato said he supports all the articles as written. Ms. Barry informed Mr. Pato that he has been assigned to present Article 4—Supplemental Appropriation for School Facilities Capital Projects. Future Meeting Dates The Board reviewed proposed meeting dates between January and June 2017. Mr. Kelley said he plans to fly back and forth during this time period to attend all the regular meetings but he is not sure yet about the summit dates. The Town election is anticipated for Monday, March 6, and Annual Town Meeting is anticipated to start on Monday, March 20. Neither item has yet come before the Board for a vote, however. Selectmen Committee Appointments and Resignations Two resignations have been tendered by members of the Historic District Commission: Lynn Hopkins and Marilyn Fenollosa. One resignation was submitted from the Transportation Advisory Committee: Francine Stieglitz. A member of the Community Farming Committee has stepped down: Charles Lamb. Amy Kaser has submitted an application to join the Lexington Council on the Arts. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to accept the resignations of Ms. Hopkins and Ms. Fenollosa from the HDC, Ms. Stieglitz from the Transportation Advisory Committee and Mr. Lamb from the Community Farming Committee, effective immediately. Further, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to appoint Ms. Kaser to the Lexington Council on the Arts, effective October 2016. Consent Agenda: _ Approve Use of the Battle Green On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the request of the 3rd Legal Operations Detachment Army Reserve of Massachusetts to use the Battle Green on Sunday, October 16, 2016 from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. for ceremonies before the Battle Road Memorial March to the Minuteman Park. 70-16 Selectmen's Meeting— September 12, 2016 Commitments and Adjustments of the Water and Sewer Charges On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the following Water& Sewer commitments and adjustments: Water& Sewer Commitments July 2016 -- Cycle 9 Billing $422,432.71 Water& Sewer Commitments July 2016 -- Final bills $19,334.95 Water& Sewer Commitments June 2016-- Final bills $28,274.83 and to rescind original amounts of$27,975.84 from the 8/15/16 BOS meeting and replace with the above June 2016 amount as shown in the exhibits from the Utility Manager. Approve One-Day Liquor License—Lexington Elks On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the request from the Lexington Elks for a one-day liquor license to serve beer and wine only in the outside designated area for a Manager/Member Appreciation Day on Sunday, September 18. 2016, from 12:00 noon to 6 p.m. at 959 Waltham Street. The license is approved subject to the Elks not serving the alcohol from the Club's licensed premises and the alcohol for the outdoor area not being taken inside and the indoor alcohol not being brought outside. Approve One-Day Liquor License—Spectacle Management On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the one-day liquor license request from Spectacle Management to sell beer and wine only in the lobby of the Cary Memorial Building, 1605 Massachusetts Avenue, for the following events: • Peter Yarrow &Paul Stookey Concert, Friday, September 16, 2016 from 7 to 10:30 p.m.; • An Evening with Garrison Keillor, Sunday, September 18, 2016 from 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. • Jimmy Tingle Comedy Show, Saturday, September 24, 2016 from 8 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. • An Evening with Garrison Keillor, Wednesday, September 28, 2016 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. • Colin Mochrie & Brad Sherwood, Thursday, September 29, 2016 from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. Approve One-Day Liquor License—Munroe Center for the Arts On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve a one- day liquor license request to serve beer and wine only at a Retirement Reception on Friday, September 16, 2016 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. Executive Session At 8:20 p.m., the Board voted 5-0 via roll call to enter into Executive Session under Exemption 6 to consider the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property, Belmont Country Club/ Hanover Development proposal, and to reconvene in Open Session only to adjourn. Adjournment Upon re-entering Open Session from Executive Session and on motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to adjourn at approximately 8:50 p.m. A true record; Attest: Kim Siebert Recording Secretary 70-17 Joint Selectmen and School Committee Meeting September 13, 2016 A joint meeting of the Board of Selectmen and the School Committee was held on Wednesday, September 13, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. in the cafeteria of the Public Services Building, 201 Bedford St. For the Board of Selectmen Chairman Barry, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pato, and Ms. Ciccolo; Mr. Valente, Town Manager were present. For the School Committee Chairman Hurley, Mr. Alessandrini, Ms. Crocker, and Ms. Jay; Dr. Czajkowski, Superintendent were present. Other attendees: Mr. Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance; Mr. Goddard, Director Public Facilities; Sandra Trach, Special Assistant to the Superintendent; Maureen Kavanaugh, LPS, Director of Planning and Assessment. Chairman Barry called the Board of Selectmen to order at 6:10 p.m.; Chairman Hurley called the School Committee to order. Chairman Barry announced that due to time considerations there would be no public comment at this meeting. Chairman Barry assigned Selectman Pato to take minutes of this meeting. Special Town Meeting—Articles 3 and 4 Discussion The School Committee and the Board of Selectmen reiterated their unanimous support for Article 4 School Facilities Capital Projects and for indefinite postponement of Article 3 Supplemental Appropriation Middle School Projects. Mr. Goddard, Public Facilities Director, reported that bids for the Middle School projects have come in below the requested appropriation and that a supplemental appropriation would not be needed. He then reviewed appropriations from the Fall 2015 Special Town Meeting,project estimates, and bids for the Elementary School capital projects. The total project bids for the acquisition and installation of 6 modular classrooms exceed the existing appropriation by $1,430,000. $520,000 of this shortfall can be covered by the portion of the appropriation originally intended for studies at the Hastings School which were not needed after the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) invited Lexington into its funding process. Article 4 requests a supplemental appropriation for the remaining $910,000. Mr. Valente reported that about$250,000 of this supplemental appropriation represents broader scope beyond what was described in the successful debt exclusion vote due to site conditions. This appropriation will be eligible for debt but will not be excludable from Proposition 21/2 limits. Enrollment Update/Work of Enrollment Advisory Group School Superintendent Dr. Czajkowski distributed enrollment statistics as of August 31, 2016 — the first day of school. The official submission to the DESE is October 1, 2016. The Town continues to experience changes in enrollment throughout the year. 70-18 Joint Selectmen and School Committee Meeting— September 13, 2016 Ms. Kavanaugh, LPS Director of Planning and Assessment,presented the preliminary enrollment data. As of August 31, elementary enrollment(K-5)was 3,046 students. Expectations for October 1 is that this number will increase but come in a little below the target projection and well within the 90% confidence interval. At the Middle School level there were 1,744 students enrolled. This is above the projected target and just within the 90% confidence interval. High School enrollments were at 2,210 and also near the top of the confidence interval. Selectman Pato, a member of the Enrollment Advisory Group (EAG), reported on the group's work. Beginning in the spring of 2016 the EAG reopened research in the effects of demographic and housing market changes on enrollment. The group is investigating three primary questions: 1) Is the Town near saturation for incoming students—that is, are we reaching a natural limit, or is there potential for enrollments to continue to rise? 2) What are the effects of home sales—of both new and of existing homes—on student enrollment? 3) Are there observable demographic waves —likely sellers leading to influx of students enrolling in the school system? The work of the group is not complete but the findings suggest that student enrollment growth will continue beyond the current forecast horizon (FY2021). Unless there is a regional economic shift, it is unlikely the Town will see relief from enrollment-related pressure on school operating and capital budgets. Ms. Kavanaugh outlined the expected annual analysis and reports that will be generated later this fall after the October 1 data is collected and analyzed. DiNisco Design Proposal for LCP, Central Administration and Elementary School Capacity/ Release of Funds Mr. Hurley introduced a proposal to request funding to further study what may be needed to do and how to phase further work on: 1) Elementary K-5 population and where to house them 2) Where to locate a facility for the Lexington Children's Place (LCP Pre K) 3) Central Office and what might be needed to support the items 1 and 2. The School Committee considers identifying where to locate the LCP as the highest priority. Mr. Goddard confirmed that the most critical item is to identify what to do with the LCP. The intention is to have the study completed in time for the School Committee to review and to bring a funding request to the Annual Town Meeting this coming Spring. The first step is to work with 70-19 Joint Selectmen and School Committee Meeting— September 13, 2016 LCP administration to validate expected growth and update the two existing analyses and create an analysis of the Pelham facility. This work is expected to need about$135,000 and a traffic analysis for the Harrington site of$15,000 should this site be confirmed for the second phase. If the preferred target location for LCP involves displacing the Central Administration, a $60,000 3-phase analysis would be pursued. For elementary space issues, an examination of the Pelham property, fully evaluating the Laconia Street property, and an addition at the new Harrington Elementary School are proposed. An addition at Estabrook connected to the loading dock as a three-story extension of existing classroom areas could result in a 30-section school. Members of the School Committee and Board of Selectmen asked clarifying questions. Ms. Barry moved and Mr. Cohen seconded a motion to authorize the release of$415,000 from STM 2016-1, Article 2, for the study of the Lexington Children's Place, Central Office, and elementary school capacity study. The Board approved the motion by a vote of 4 —0. Central Registration Plan Update Dr. Czajkowski presented a proposal to implement a central student registration process. Currently student registration occurs at 10 sites —each of the school facilities. This creates consistency issues and makes it difficult to look at ongoing system-wide changes. There can be as many as 60 enrollment changes per site per month. The School Committee created a position of Special Assistant to the Superintendent for Registration and Residency to focus on the mobility issues around the district. The goal is to begin central registration in January 2017 with Pre K, Kindergarten, and Grade 1. A best practice identified by Brookline, where a central registration process has been implemented, is to start small and expand over time. Ms. Trach, Special Assistant to the Superintendent,presented the outline for the plan. The timeline is to begin in early January for incoming students for Pre K, Kindergarten, and Grade 1 along with their siblings so that families can be kept together. To support the process staff is looking at the software system used by Brookline and other packages that are compatible with Lexington's system as well as manual processes. March 16, 2017 is an important date because that is when the Kindergarten registration evening is held which leads to an exceptionally busy period for families registering new students. 70-20 Joint Selectmen and School Committee Meeting— September 13, 2016 Securing office space is the most critical need—space suitable for staff and families participating in the process. This includes play space for children accompanying their parents through the process. School Committee and Board of Selectmen Goals for 2016-2017 Ms. Barry outlined the subset of the Selectmen's 17 goals that are related to the interests of the School Committee. These highlighted goals are: 43) Affordability for Residents 45) Sustainability Standards and Processes for Building Projects 47) Youth Issues 48)Public Information and Communication 49)Public Service Impacts of Changing Demographics, Diversity Ms. Crocker observed that goal 46) Complete Streets would benefit from inclusion of the Safe Routes to School program. Mr. Hurley reviewed the School Committee goals which he observed to be focused on the business of education. He confirmed that the Selectmen's goals identified by Ms. Barry were of common interest and that all issues of safety relate to the children in the school system. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted 4 — 0 to adjourn at 7:13 p.m. The School Committee voted unanimously to adjourn. Documents Presented: SNAPSHOT OF SCHOOL ENROLLMENT A true record; Attest: Joseph N. Pato Selectman 70-21 Selectmen's Meeting September 21, 2016 A meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, at 6:00 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room. Ms. Barry, Chairman, Mr. Kelley, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pato, and Ms. Ciccolo; and Mr. Valente, Town Manager, were present. Other attendees: Mina Markarious, Town Counsel Selectmen Concerns and Liaison Reports Ms. Barry thanked everyone who came out yesterday for the Minuteman High School vote. She had challenged the Town to do double what they did in the State Primary (8%) and they did 13%. She also thanked the departments involved in the discussion on opioid addiction held in Cary Hall, which she and Selectmen Cohen attended. Ms. Ciccolo attended the Mass Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Board and they had a presentation on a prioritization tool that the MAPC designed to help communities decide where they maintain pedestrian or bike facilities. They will be unveiling it formally at the Moving Forward Confer- ence next week. She believes it will be a tool of great assistance to the Town of Lexington. Purchase and Sale Agreement— 171-173 Bedford Street Mr. Valente presented the draft of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. He has been working with Town Counsel on this and wanted to know if the Board had any questions or comments. Because of the 5 day requirement to sign this, he is asking for the Board's permission for the Town Manager to sign this after all comments are received from the Board. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5-0 to authorize the Town Manager to make changes to the draft Purchase and Sale Agreement for 171-173 Bedford Street as may be recom- mended by Town Counsel, and to sign said final Agreement on behalf of the Board of Selectmen. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to authorize the Town Manager to make changes to the draft Lease Agreement for 171-173 Bedford Street as may be recommended by Town Counsel, and to sign said final Agreement on behalf of the Board of Selectmen. Special Town Meeting—Article Positions Nothing to discuss. Selectmen Committee Appointments & Resignations Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to accept the resignations of Paul Ross and Nancy Shepherd from the Historic Districts Commission. 70-22 Selectmen's Meeting— September 21, 2016 Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to appoint Susan Barrett to the Transportation Advisory Committee, for a term through September 2017. Town Counsel, Attorney Mina Markarious addressed the question of how members of the Historic Districts Commission (HDC) are appointed. Lexington's Special Act setting up the HDC provides for 5 full members and 4 associate members. The rive full members are nominated as follows: 2 by the Lexington Historical Society (LHS) and 1 each by the Lexington Arts and Crafts Society (LACS), the Cary Memorial Library Trustees (CMLT) and the Board of Selectmen. Currently, there are 2 full member vacancies, both of which are to be filled from persons nominated by the LHS. For associate members, Town Counsel's interpretation of the language of the Special Act is that if there is one vacancy, each of the nominating groups (Lexington Historical Society, Lexington Arts and Crafts Society and Cary Memorial Library Trustees) should submit one nominee and the Selectmen will appoint one of the three. If there is more than one associate member vacancy, the nominating groups should each submit two nominees and the Selectmen will fill the vacancies from the six submitted nominees. The associate members do not have to track the distribution existing with the full members, but it is up to the discretion of the Board of Selectmen. Mr. Cohen stated that in the past that is not the way associate members have been appointed. The 4 associate members were 2 from the Historical Society, one from the Arts and Crafts Society and one from Cary Memorial Library. For each vacancy the original nominating body would submit one nominee for the vacancy. Mr. Cohen suggested that the Board look into amending the Special Act to bring back the past practice of appointing associate members or consider adopting the General Law Statute relating to HDC's. He also noted that contrary to what several of the most recent members of the HDC stated in their resignation letters, they do not represent the group that nominated them. They represent the Town as a whole and their decisions should not be influenced by the group that nominated them. Mr. Kelley asked if this would be a change to the Special Act or would we have to involve the State. Mr. Cohen responded that we would have to have an article in the warrant to authorize the Selectmen to petition the General Court for an amendment to the Special Act setting up Lexington's HDC. Ms. Barry stated that it appears from what they have heard tonight from Town Counsel indicates that they need to change the way they solicit recommendations for associate members. Ms. Ciccolo stated she wanted to note that it will be a change to what the community is used to, so it needs to be clarified. The past practice followed a different format. We need to make sure that groups who send nominations understand. 70-23 Selectmen's Meeting— September 21, 2016 Mr. Pato stated that the language is plain, but it is embedded in a long paragraph so if you just extracted the sentence, it would match what Town Counsel is saying. Ms. Ciccolo stated that the past practice makes sense. We want associate members promoted to full membership. Also, they do not want to end up with a situation where they end up with all members from the same group. Mr. Pato stated that the HDC serves a vital role for the community in preserving our heritage and the character of the town. All appointees and nominees are serving the community, not just an interest in the community. They should be competent but disinterested and without bias. Ms. Susan Bennett, 64 Bloomfield St, Lexington Historical Society executive director, requests that the Board spend a little more time explaining the meaning of the statute to determine why the current practice is done. Another interpretation is to replicate at the Associate Level what happens at the full commissioner level. For a full commissioner, they require 2 nominees and for an Associate, they require 3 nominees. If there are two Associate positions open, there would be 6 nominees. Ms. Bennett asked if there would still be 6 nominees if there were 3 Associate positions open. Attorney Markarious responded yes. Ms. Bennett stated that she does not believe the language was meant to be interpreted that way and should have greater consideration and research and reaching back to the original statutory construction. Ms. Ciccolo asked Attorney Markarious if there is a reason why the nominating boards could not send more nominees if they wished to do so. Attorney Markarious responded that the statute does not bar them from sending more than 2, but this Board's role is to ask for 2. Mr. Richard Pagett, Precinct 6, asked Mr. Cohen to clarify what he is suggesting. Mr. Cohen responded that to clarify the statute, the Town would have to go to the State for approval. Mr. Pagett stated that it does not make sense to throw out what the Town has been practicing for 60 years. He believes that what Town Counsel is suggesting is a more complicated way of doing it. The LHS's view has always been to suggest nominees that are not always LHS members. Mr. Cohen stated that he agrees that they should continue doing what they have always done. It never came up before because no one ever asked Town Counsel if that was the way to do it. There are currently some cases that are pending with the HDC and the Selectmen need to make sure they make appointments soon. Ms. Barry asked if the Board continues to make appointments the way they have always done, will it give the Town any liability exposure. Attorney Markarious stated that where they have four(4) associate openings right now, they still have the opportunity to weigh the balance and fill those spots. In regard to exposure, he does not think there is a big risk and most courts would agree it is very attenuated. 70-24 Selectmen's Meeting— September 21, 2016 Ms. Elaine Ashton, 32 Cliffe Avenue, asked what would happen in the event that the entities did not put forth any candidates. Attorney Markarious stated that there is not any language that addresses it. Ms. Bennett stated that she wants to reiterate the point of the importance of the HDC as an independent regulatory body given that it is structured so that there is no monopoly on nominations, or even undue influence the nominations. The associate members were meant to mimic the full commissioners. Another point— one associate position was vacated in July. A nomination has been forwarded for that position under the rules under which we have operated. The unwieldiness of the proposed structure is going to defy administration. The statutory drafters could not have anticipated that intent. Ms. Ciccolo stated that if you read to the end of the section, the Commission can elect a Chairman pro tempore, and the vacancies can be filled by the Chairman until they are duly appointed by the Selectmen from the associates. Mr. Pato stated that he was comfortable with past practice but with Town Counsel providing new guidance and having the language of the statute in front of us, he would like to follow his guidance. Mr. Kelley and Ms. Barry agreed. Mr. Cohen stated that there was one associate member that resigned in June and at that time, the Board did not have the guidance, and the Library submitted a nomination of one (1)person. He would like to look into that since it was done before the new interpretation. He also agreed that the Board should go along with the interpretation of Town Counsel but the Board should look into changing the language to go back to what we have previously been doing. Ms. Ciccolo stated that she agrees that the Board should follow what the Town Counsel is advising, but for the current decision for the filling of the position, they should do what has been traditionally followed. The language should be altered. Consent Agenda _ Approve One-Day Liquor License— Cary Memorial Library Foundation Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to approve the request of the Cary Memorial Library Foundation for a one-day liquor license to serve beer and wine at their "Transformative Spaces Donor Thank You" event at the Cary Memorial Library on Friday October 14, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. Approve Minutes and Executive Session Minutes Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to approve the minutes of, June 6, 2016, June 13, 2016, June 22, 2016 and June 27, 2016. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to approve and not release the Executive Session minutes of June 6,2016,June 13,2016 and June 27, 2016. 70-25 Selectmen's Meeting— September 21, 2016 Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 — 0 to adjourn at 7:05 p.m. A true record; Attest: Jennifer Gingras Recording Secretary 70-26 Selectmen's Meeting September 26, 2016 A meeting of the Lexington Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, September 26, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the Town Office Building. Chairman Barry, Mr. Kelley, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pato, and Ms. Ciccolo were present as well as Mr. Valente, Town Manager and Ms. Siebert, Recording Secretary. Public Comments Ms. Margie Sharfin, 9 Loring Road, spoke to the issue of the Historic District Commission's recent spate of resignations, referring to an article in The Lexington Minuteman dated September 22, 2016. Ms. Sharfin said she was surprised to learn that the HDC now has too few members to operate and she questioned whether Massachusetts General Law and established committee appointment protocol had been circumvented by the Selectmen's vote to elevate an associate committee member to full-member status over HDC-recommended applicants. Ms. Sharfin asked how this problem would be resolved, how committee"balance" would be achieved, and whether the traditional process of member appointment would be restored. Mr. Cohen responded that laws governing Lexington's HDC are not those Ms. Sharfin referred to and added that the traditional way of appointing was adhered to in this case. Selectmen's Concerns/Liaison Reports As the Selectmen received their flu shots, Board of Health Director Gerry Cody spoke about the best methods to prevent the sickness and noted two upcoming public flu clinics: Saturday, October 29, 10:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. at the Clark Middle School gymnasium, 17 Stedman Rd; and Wednesday, December 7, 4:00 -7:00 p.m. at Lexington High School in the Media Room, 251 Waltham St. The clinics are open to those over 5 yrs. of age; only the Quadravalent vaccine will be administered. This year the flu mist is not available anywhere in the country. The vaccine has been developed to protect against two influenza A strands and two influenza B strands. Ms. Barry reported that Claire Goodwin of the Town Manager's office is running a"Life of a Permit" workshop on Tuesday, October 4, 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. in Estabrook Hall in the Cary Memorial Building. Renovations and new construction will be covered. Pre-registration for the workshop is requested. Town Manager's Report Mr. Valente had six items: • Mr. Tom Case, new Chief Information Officer, was introduced. Mr. Case started in early August and comes to Lexington with 27 yrs. of IT experience. Mr. Valente said Mr. Case is a team player with an optimistic, enthusiastic attitude. • Mr. Rob Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance, has announced his intention to retire in January. Mr. Valente said he has worked with Mr. Addelson for the 70-27 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 majority of his career and added that"Rob is an incredible part of operations here." At the request of Mr. Valente, the Board withheld expressions of appreciation for Mr. Addelson until a future date. • Ms. Candy McLaughlin, Program Manager in the Town's Information Technology Department, has announced her retirement on December 16. Ms. McLaughlin has served 29 years in the Town Manager's Office and two years in Information Technology. She is largely responsible for implementing the Town's online permitting system. Mr. Valente commended Ms. McLaughlin's flexibility and willingness to tackle a variety of tasks. • Following Special Town Meeting approval of the purchase of the Liberty Mutual property at 171/173 Bedford Street, the process now begins to determine how to turn the building into swing space for the Fire Station during a renovation. Also, an evaluation will be conducted to see if the building is suitable as a permanent location for the Police Station. Both projects will be overseen by the Permanent Building Committee (PBC) and Mr. Valente asked the Selectmen to appoint four new members, two to serve on the Fire Station portion of the project, which will happen first, and two to focus on the Police Station, in a somewhat later time frame. The process of selecting a building designer will begin mid-October. Advertisements and interviews to choose the designer(s) for both projects will occur simultaneously. Mr. Valente has also asked both Fire and Police Chiefs for PBC member recommendations. It is desirable to have the new members on board in time for the mid-October interviews. • Burlington has contacted Lexington about buying water. The drought has critically depleted Burlington's reservoir and town wells and the town has had an outside watering ban in place all summer. Mr. Valente said an agreement was made in the 1950s that opened the door for this sort of arrangement in times of need. Burlington has contacted the DEP to start the authorization process. Burlington has purchased water from Lexington in the past, usually in small amounts and usually in the summer. Because Burlington is at a lower elevation than Lexington, there should be no negative impact to Lexington's water pressure. Mr. Valente said that both towns' engineers will evaluate and confirm this assumption. • Mr. Valente read an excerpt from a letter written by Police Chief Mark Corr, commending Parking Enforcement Officer Jim Cataldo for his supervision of the recent town center parking meter installation. Mr. Valente also read a statement from Economic Development Officer Melissa Tintocallis that seconded Chief Corr's praise of Mr. Cataldo. Public Hearing—Receive Comments on Proposed FY17 Water/Sewer Rates 70-28 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Ms. Barry opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. and recognized Assistant Town Manager for Finance Mr. Addelson who presented information relevant to setting the FYI water and sewer rates. This was the second of three meetings on the matter; the third will be held on October 13, 2016, at which time it is anticipated that FY2017 rates will be approved by the Board of Selectmen. Tonight's meeting was for the purpose of taking public comment. Via PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Addelson reviewed information presented at the September 12, 2016 meeting during which he highlighted the results of FY16 water/wastewater operations: billed usage and retained earnings histories including consumption drivers; the FY2017 water/ sewer budgets as adopted at the 2016 ATM; proposed changes to the budgets adopted last spring; and preliminary recommendations for FYI water/sewer rates. It was noted that the rates proposed at the first meeting and the rates now proposed differ due to a revised projection of irrigation usage, shown at the September meeting as 350,000 HCF. Data subsequently received from the MWRA revised that number to 370,000 HCF which reduces the proposed combined rate for the average user from 3.8%to 2.8%. If approved, the rates would affect the three categories of residential user in this way: a 2.8% increase for the low user (50 HCF/yr); a 2.8% increase for the average user (120 HCF/yr); and a 2.7% increase for the high user(1000 HCF/yr). Mr. David Kanter, 48 Fifer Lane, Precinct 7 Town Meeting member, said he would prefer to see percentage increases that encourage conservation instead of equal application of flat percentage increases across the three categories. He also asked whether the rates took into account the impact of Burlington's purchase of MWRA water through Lexington as noted in the Town Manager's report. Mr. Addelson replied that the presentation made no assumptions about Burlington usage. Revenue from Burlington would result in a surplus of retained earnings at the end of FYI and the increased volume of usage would not affect Lexington's MWRA assessment until FYI 8. In all likelihood, the surplus revenue would be used to offset an MWRA assessment increase as is the current practice. Mr. Kanter asked whether water bans might affect water usage/revenue in the upcoming year. Mr. Addelson said that the Town is cognizant of that possibility and added that one of the reasons a portion of retained earnings is held on account is to cushion against revenue shortfall. He added there is no rolling aggregate of retained earnings; the amount in that account is recertified each year. Mr. Bartenstein, Precinct 1 Town Meeting member and member of the Appropriations Committee, said he was speaking as a resident but also as a member of the Appropriations Committee who has followed the water/sewer subject over time. His major concern is usage assumptions that drive whether the Town breaks even or experiences a surplus of water/sewer revenue. 70-29 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Saying that the Town has improved its water use/cost forecasting accuracy, Mr. Bartenstein noted several related trends: a slow-but-gradual decline in Tier 1 and Tier 2 water and sewer volume which he attributed to installation of modern, lower-flow plumbing and conservation efforts; larger McMansion style homes plus an increased number of irrigation meters that result in reduced Tier 1 and Tier 2 usage but increase Tier 3 and irrigation-rate volume. Mr. Bartenstein attributed a large proportion of Tier 3 use increases to the Shire Corporation which ramped up in 2010 but now appears to have plateaued. Mr. Bartenstein concluded that, although a rate increase is probably not necessary for FYI 7, it is reasonable to approve a slight increase and bank anticipated dry-weather surpluses from drought years like this one to apply them to capital projects for the long-term health of the system and to avoid future sharp rate increases. He said he would review data from the Section 1 irrigation usage that will be available later this week,predicting that irrigation usage will be far higher than the forecast due to the drought conditions over the summer. Mr. Bartenstein said he will follow up with a more specific written proposal before Oct. 13. Ms. Barry closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. LexEat Proclamation On the occasion of LexEat Together's first anniversary, the Board congratulated the organization for its efforts to address food insecurity and social isolation in Lexington and a proclamation of commendation was signed by the Selectmen. Three of the four LexEat founders present were George Murnaghan, Harriet Kaufman, and John Bernhard. Laura Derby, the fourth founder, was unable to attend. Ms. Barry read the proclamation in full and encouraged the public to volunteer by signing up on the organization's website. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve and sign the proclamation recognizing the first anniversary of LexEat Together. Discussion—RCN Ownership Transfer and License Renewal Mr. Dave Buczkowski and Mr. Nick Lauriat from the Communication Advisory Committee (CAC)presented information about RCN's license renewal and license transferal to private equity firm TPG Capital. Mr. Buczkowski said the term of the current license is 10 years but renewal processes begins 3 years before the expiration date. The CAC is seeking approval from the Selectmen to start the renewal process which begins with an ascertainment or solicitation of input from the public, the School Committee, the Town Manager and others. CAC members report that RCN has been great to work with and they do not foresee any future problems because TPG will keep the current RCN management structure in place. To approve a change of license to TPG, affected towns review four criteria: management 70-30 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 experience, technical expertise, financial capability, and legal ability to operate under the existing license. RCN filed a change of license form with the State on September 9, 2016 and CAC has 30 days to review the form and submit comments. Within 60 days—or prior to November 8th CAC must hold a hearing. A decision must be made by January 7, 2017120 days from the initial filing. If these steps are not taken, the license will be allowed to transfer by default. CAC asks that a public hearing be scheduled for the October 24 Selectmen's meeting. Legal notices will be posted in the newspapers on October 6 and October 13. Ms. Ciccolo said she serves on the Public Works and Policy Committee of the Massachusetts Municipal Association which is looking at changes in technology and implications for cable licensing fees, specifically due to broadband and fiber optics. She asked whether the CAC had considered the potential impact of changing technology on local PEG access channels. Mr. Buczkowski replied that the changing tech landscape is the reason towns do not conclude contract negotiations with cable providers until the last possible date. Broadband, however, is not within the purview of the license so he does not anticipate an impact. Mr. Lauriat said the Committee has been concerned that cable revenues would trend downward as people cut the cord in favor of internet-based entertainment. Lexington, however, has not been quick to follow that trend so there is an ample cushion of income for LexMedia. Mr. Pato thanked the CAC for its hard work,particularly since it deals with a lot of technical issues and contract negotiations. Mr. Kanter, Precinct 7 Town Meeting member, asked what percentage of the town's subscribers are RCN customers. Mr. Buczkowski could not be specific but, of the providers available, he believes RCN has the lowest market share of Lexington's providers. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to authorize the Communications Advisory Committee to begin the process of negotiating a renewal cable television license with RCN. Review and Approve Rental RatesCommunity Center Ms. Barry recognized Ms. Sheila Butts, Director of the Community Center, and Ms. Karen Simmons, Director of Recreation and Community Programs. Ms. Butts said the Town has been operating the Community Center for just over a year and in that time the staff has been working to devise an online sign up system and a schedule of fees whereby community groups can view availability and reserve space. A fee schedule, consistent with other Town and School rental rates, has been approved by the Recreation Committee and a copy was attached to the Selectmen's meeting materials. The Community Center Program Advisory Committee also reviewed the schedule at their September 22, 2016 meeting. So far, fees have not been charged for use of Community Center space but the goal is for the Community Center to be self-funding. 70-31 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Ms. Butts said the original intent of tonight's presentation was to seek rate approval but there has been considerable community pushback now that the introduction of fees is imminent. She stressed that the deliberation process has strived to be fair, equitable, and transparent. She asked the selectmen for direction on how to proceed. Ms. Ciccolo asked whether the rental fee deliberations had considered making non-profits exempt,just as Town government committees and boards are exempt. Ms. Butts said it had been considered but the committee found it complicated to decide which non-profits would be exempt and which would not. Ultimately the decision to waive fees rests with the Town Manager's office. Ms. Ciccolo said perhaps non-profits could apply formally for exemption and renew their request periodically over time. Ms. Ciccolo said it would be helpful to see a revenue projection for the Community Center as well as to gain an understanding of which spaces were free for drop-in and which necessitated a fee. She recognized the need for management controls and acknowledged the enormous amount of work that maintaining the facility requires. Ms. Ciccolo added, however, that some circumstances might not require set up/clean up and that this could be a factor in how— or whether—fees are charged. Ms. Butts said she would be happy to revisit the policy and the small room fee structure. Mr. Pato asked if a room is not pre-reserved, could it be available for spontaneous use. Ms. Butts said this already happens and, if the request can be accommodated, it is. She said the Center likes spontaneous users to occupy the mansion area but it depends on what the patrons need. Mr. Pato said there might be a difference in how drop-in and scheduled uses are handled. He appreciates the need for fees to support the Center but, since the building constitutes an expansion of Town space,programs and services, he would like more time and information to consider how to proceed. Ms. Ciccolo agreed that there is a need for spontaneously available, flexible space. We want to make sure we always have a percentage of the rooms available for spontaneous use. If there is a way to distinguish between the ongoing activities, week after week, and someone who wants to book a room within 10 hours of their activity, you would always have a couple of first-come/ first-served rooms available for organic, community activity. Mr. Kelley asked if there was an adopted policy for the Community Center to be self-financing. Ms. Butts said it was the Center's goal to be self-sustaining within 5 years of opening the doors and Mr. Valente said the goal is to reduce the tax subsidy after investing to build programming. The first year the tax subsidy was $216,000, but it increased to $253,000 for the second year due to hiring staff for additional programs. Mr. Kelley noted some of the programs offered require payment, which is a component of the Community Center's revenue stream. Ms. Butts said the wellness programs charge a fee for instruction and supplies. Each program has its own budget. Other programs are free or at a low 70-32 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 cost. Ms. Simmons said it is important to note that staff now supported by the tax levy will move to being paid through the Community Center enterprise fund. While the tax levy supports $253,000 of the Center's operating costs, the enterprise fund is supposed to cover the balance but there has been a shortfall. The Recreation Department as a whole was in the black but the Community Center Division did not perform as budgeted. Mr. Kelley said he is pleased to see the Town moving toward online space reservation and said he would also like to see some of the Center's space be available for informal use. Mr. Cohen said he hoped the Community Center would go ahead with the plan to charge fees but noted that the waiver policy might warrant adjustment. There are certain circumstances and groups, like LexEats, that would not be eligible for a waiver using the current criteria, but they nonetheless serve the town in highly-valued ways. Mr. Harry Forsdick, Town Meeting member Precinct 7 and former member of the ad hoc Community Center Advisory Committee, spoke in favor of considering the organic user who would like to occasionally convene small group discussions. He approved the fees as written and also approves of the standardization of fees and how/to whom fees are applied. Mr. Steven Heinrich, Precinct 3 Town Meeting member, asked for more clarity and transparency about which organizations can or cannot use the Center. He is not concerned about fees but he is concerned about whether an unofficial/undocumented non-profit can use the Center. Ms. Elaine Ashton, President of the East Lexington Community Association, said she has enjoyed being able to use the Center without charge. Ms. Ashton said she is not concerned about fees,per se, but her organization is converting from 501c4 to 501c3 and would not, before the change of status becomes official, be eligible to continue using the facility without cost. Ms. Ciccolo asked that Ms. Butts and Ms. Simmons revisit a previously expressed idea of instituting membership fees. If you had to pay a nominal fee to be able to book a room, that may feel more welcoming and less of a deterrent and you may end up with the same revenue from the small meeting rooms. Ms. Simmons said the group would be happy to reconsider the question but added that the discussion about non-resident membership fees had become a complicated conversation. Staff Report Opioid Epidemic Public Health Director Gerry Cody; Charlotte Rodgers, Director of Human Services; Derek Sencabaugh, Assistant Fire Chief, and Mark Corr, Chief of Police presented a report outlining the Town's programs to address opioid abuse in the community. Mr. Cody provided trend and statistical data. Lexington has experienced 5 opioid-related deaths since 2012 but neighboring towns have reported far more. Chief Corr emphasized that the opioid crisis is not new but the strength of the drug and extent of the problem has increased in recent 70-33 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 years. Lexington has not been complacent nor has it been hiding its head in the sand. A task force, including those present this evening, has been meeting monthly for several years to discuss the trends and at-risk individuals/families in an attempt to proactively provide assistance Philosophically, there is less emphasis on legal action and more on social services. "The opioid crisis is just one behavior of some of the things we're trying to stay ahead of," Chief Corr said. Assistant Chief Sencabaugh showed the Selectmen doses of Narcan, which is administered via nasal atomizer and carried on all fire response vehicles and ambulances. Police do not yet carry Narcan but the goal is to train all officers so they can activate and administer the medication. In 2014, Lexington had 14 near-deaths that were averted using 17 doses of Narcan; in 2015, there were 17 that required 22 doses. So far this year, there have been 11 cases that have required 18 doses. More Narcan is needed as opioids become more lethal. Mr. Sencabaugh stipulated that not all opioid overdoses are from heroin; some are prescription drug-related. Ms. Rodgers echoed her colleagues and added that no one should hesitate to call first responders if an overdose is suspected. The opioid abuse task force emphasizes reduction of shame and stigma. Another task force focal point is raising awareness about mental health and substance abuse. The Town co-hosts with the Schools a yearly "parent academy" and monthly parent support groups. A recent program about mental health/substance abuse with Dr. Kevin Hill of McLean's Hospital was taped and is now available via LexMedia. This month, an informational article will appear in the Colonial Times and public health and human services staff will be at the October 3 Farmers' Market to provide information to the community. The School nurses are trained and annually re-certified on how to correctly administer Narcan and the medication is on site at all the public schools. The nurses will implement a national program called SBIRT: Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment. In January, all 9th grade students will be screened. Finally, information will be made available on a Town webpage. The group announced the next medical waste collection event on Wednesday, October 5, 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. behind the Town Office Building. A second event will take place on Saturday, October 15, 9 a.m. to noon at the same location. There is no charge and all medicine/syringes are accepted. Ms. Barry thanked the presenting group for the informative reports and expressed gratitude on behalf of the Town to it first responders who see the crisis first hand. She offered the Board's support in the ongoing battle against opioid abuse. Review Public CommentsStormwater Regulations This is a follow-up from a July 25th presentation. At that meeting, the DPW was asked to continue its outreach to developers about stormwater regulations. A meeting was held for that purpose on September 8 and revisions to the draft were subsequently made. 70-34 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Two big themes emerged, according to presenters David Pavlik, Senior Engineer, and Denise Cameron, Woodard and Curran. The first dealt with clarity of applicability and classifications. In response, some of the definitions that appeared in appendices at the end of the document have been pulled forward to the beginning of the document and clarifying language was added. The second theme centered on the below-threshold category, defined as a project that disturbs less than an acre of ground and is, basically, an erosion and sedimentation control. Developers requested that the permitting process be streamlined since code enforcement already acts as oversight. Mr. Kelley participated in the September 8 meeting and he confirmed that the changes outlined match his understanding of the feedback. He added that the development community clearly understood the value of what was trying to be achieved. Mr. Kelley asked about the application fee for above-threshold projects, written as "the greater of$300.00 or $0.01 per square foot." In the interest of fairness, he recommended keeping the $300.00 but removing the $0.01 per foot Mr. Kelley said he would like to capture the responsibility of projects—like additions to houses—that do not entail demolition of 50% of the existing structure. Ms. Cameron said this type of scenario is built into the building permit process and would be captured within the erosion and sedimentation control review. Mr. Kelley said he was comfortable with this. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted 5-0 to approve the Lexington Stormwater Management Regulations, Lexington Code, Chapter 181, Article VI, effective January 1, 2017. Review Public Comments—Draft Payment-in-Lieu-of-Parkin _g PolicyPolicy On July 25, a presentation of a draft Payment-In-Lieu of Parking policy (PILOP)was made to the Board of Selectmen who offered comments and then directed staff to solicit input from a variety of other stakeholders (Planning Board, Chamber of Commerce, Center Committee, Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA),property owners in the Center Business District and the general public)through September. Melissa Tintocalis, Economic Development Officer; and Aaron Henry, Planning Director, followed up with the Board of Selectmen to present findings and propose revisions. Ms. Tintocalis highlighted these changes for the Board's review: • There was a consensus opinion among stakeholders that parking counts for an existing building should not trigger parking mitigation costs if the building use changed. New construction, however, would be subject to the PIL,OP policy; • The suggested mitigation price of$8,000 per parking space engendered essentially two conflicting opinions: 1)the price was too high and would therefore stall development and 2)the price was too low and amounted to a giveaway; 70-35 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 • The Planning Board expressed concern about the concept of a one-time payment versus an annual payment and how the payment(s)would be administered. Also, Planning has identified parking and zoning as a priority focus for the coming year; Mr. Henry said the timing of the adoption of the PILOP policy might conflict with Planning's review. Ms. Ciccolo asked if the number of people in the "fee is too high" camp was greater or smaller than the number in the"fee is too low" camp. If no one liked it, $8,000 might actually be the right amount. Ms. Tintocalis said the conflict was conceptual rather than split into camps of opinion. Mr. Kelley asked if an effort had been made to ascertain the cost of leasing a parking space. Ms. Tintocalis said the team looked into the private market's monthly fees but did not recommend recurring charges because of the administrative burden. Mr. Pato asked if Ms. Tintocalis had researched the cost of constructing a parking space. While he does not recommend charging the full true cost, he does envision the fee as a contribution toward a longer-term solution. Ms. Ciccolo agreed that the policy is moving in the right direction. The full, true cost of a parking space, $25,000, is too much to charge. Lexington wants to encourage shared parking and pedestrian or bicycle use instead of motor vehicle dependency. Mr. Cohen agreed that the policy is well-thought out. The PILOP, however, is only focused on the town center. He does not think there is much land left in the center so he thinks we have to have a policy. But he does not want it to stymie any change that would be beneficial to the town. Mr. Valente said, now that the Selectmen have commented, the Planning Board will need to ascertain whether the PILOP constitutes an integrated bridge to any zoning changes it may develop. Once that is done, the PILOP will come before the Selectmen again, sometime in November. Mr. Kanter, Precinct 7 Town Meeting member, said he believes the PILOP would be premature if the Planning Board intends to bring forward zoning changes. He also believes the $8,000 mitigation amount is woefully inadequate. Additionally, he disagreed with eliminating the change of use clause because intended use is what triggers the parking count requirements to begin with. He acknowledged the time constraint to get something on the books but expressed concern about a potential conflict between what the Planning Board might recommend and what the PILOP requires. Mr. John Farrington, speaking as a representative of downtown owners and developers, agreed that the PILOP was premature. He added that there are State protections in place that the Planning Board takes into account when deliberating change of use permits and those would apply to a specific change of use redevelopment project envisioned for 1777 Massachusetts Ave. 70-36 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 As for the $8,000 mitigation charge, Mr. Farrington is of the opinion that lending institutions will decline applications that include parking mitigation costs they consider too high. Mr. Todd Cataldo, 168 Grant St., and Muzzey Street property owner, said that if the PILOP passed as written, his current project would require payment of$320,000 for parking mitigation which is approximately 20% of the cost of the entire project. If this came to pass, his project would not be economically viable. In an MOU with the Town dating back two years, Mr. Cataldo said he agreed to reconfigure the Cary Memorial Library parking lot in such a way that would result in a yield of 50 additional parking spaces. He asked where this project stands and why it has not been a priority. Mr. Valente replied that the project is a Town priority but it has been delayed by other matters in that area of town that he is not at liberty to discuss. Ms. Tintocalis asked if the Board has a position on the change of use clause. Mr. Kelley said he remains against the inclusion of the change of use provision because it is burdensome and unnecessary and such a requirement would be detrimental to the vitality of the town center. When the situation comes up, the parking requirement is often waived by the ZBA, in any case. Ms. Ciccolo agreed with Mr. Kelley saying change of use should not be subject to the PILOP because it is not a wholesale redevelopment of the building. Referring to the percentage of costs Mr. Cataldo cited, she asked if a percentage cap of total project costs had been considered. She added that a true understanding should be reached of how the parking resource is shared among businesses in the center because people park once to do multiple errands. This is what we are struggling with: the old requirements are too high, given the availability of parking, and yet we do not want to be left holding the bag having to construct new parking for every new building. Finally. Ms. Ciccolo said a comprehensive understanding of new growth and the role additional tax revenue can play would be useful to the conversation. Mr. Pato said, the more he has come to understand all the contributing factors, the more he thinks that small changes of use do not matter. Significant increases in demand that stem from changes of use,particularly at peak hours, are another matter. If the scale of change of use equates to a greatly increased need for additional parking, then he believes the PILOP should apply. He also believes that a change of use within a short time period should be viewed as potentially subject to the policy. Mr. Cohen asked how the timing of the PILOP affects Mr. Cataldo's 21 Muzzey St. project since the building is already built. Mr. Valente said it was stipulated that the project be subject to any policy put in place within a year of Mr. Cataldo's certificate of occupancy. After that year, Mr. Cataldo would be free from additional fees. That agreement grandfathered 20 spaces so Mr. Cataldo would owe another 20 spaces (20 x $8,000=$160,000), not 40 ($320,000) as Mr. Cataldo had calculated. Mr. Kelley said this calculus of combining grandfathered plus new use parking counts should be how a final number of required spaces is determined. 70-37 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Mr. Valente said it was harder to know how the PIL,OP would affect the project at 1777 Mass. Ave. The Planning Board has yet to determine what its policy will be but while it is responsible for making zoning proposals, it is not responsible for parking management in the center of town. Mr. Valente recommended that the Selectmen discuss this with the Planning Board at their joint meeting in October. Mr. Cohen and Ms. Barry said they were both in favor of removing the change of use clause from the PILOP. Receive Report from Ad Hoc Center Street Scape Design Review Committee on Tier I Deliverables Presenters of the Tier 1 Center Street Scape Committee findings were: Howard Levin (Chair), Victoria Buckley (Commission on Disability) and Pamela Shadley (Center Committee). Tier 1 focuses exclusively on sidewalks and lighting, recommending an integrated approach for a stretch of Mass. Ave. from the Minuteman Statue to Woburn St. Mr. Levin said that different parts of the center show different levels of deterioration. The project would be done in phases. • Recommendations for the sidewalk include: wire-cut, square-edge clay brick pavers with no spacers, of colors ranging from red to dark brown (but not orange), laid in herringbone pattern to absorb vibrational shock. Sidewalk construction would include root barriers, drainage holes, and appropriate slant. The final design will comply with AAB and ADA standards and sidewalk smoothness will be consistent, to the extent possible, with the newly developed"Wheelchair Pathway Roughness Index." • Lighting recommendations include: The use of LED bulbs for lower electricity and maintenance costs with varying illumination levels dependent upon location and of the area is used. A balance of pole height and lantern style will integrate the appearance of center lighting. Pole, lantern, and arm designs will have a graceful, elegant curve. Tall roadway lights will disappear as much as possible. Pedestrian lights should be used down the entire length of the focus area. They should resemble Sasaki lights but, to minimize cost, not be custom designed. Ms. Buckley, Disabilities Commission representative,provided an assessment of the above recommendations,particularly those relating to sidewalks, saying the Disability Commission has three major concerns about the choice of brick. First, the Commission believes that the Committee did not explore concrete thoroughly enough as an option. Second, brick is not a good choice for individuals with disabilities because it constitutes an unnecessary hazard and can cause sensory overload. Third, the Commission believes the importance of aesthetics should receive less weight than the importance of functionality. Mr. Kelley cautioned the Committee not to use the term "paver" because that did not mean "brick" to most people and it could cause misunderstandings. 70-38 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Ms. Ciccolo praised the Committee's work on such an enormous, complex task and then asked if colorized concrete had been considered. Mr. Levin said it had been but the consideration was short-lived because colorized concrete did not appear to be a successful alternative and problems occur when dissimilar materials are joined. Ms. Buckley said she agrees that colorization is not preferred because the visually impaired require material that provides contrast to make wayfinding easier. Mr. Cohen echoed sentiments that the report was well done and thorough. He asked if the Committee had considered ending the brick sidewalk at the Post Office since the sidewalk from there to Woburn St. is already concrete. Mr. Levin replied it was the goal of the Committee to create a continuous streetscape and a gateway to and through the center. Mr. Cohen said that although the Committee reported that brick is tolerant of salt, an area of brick sidewalk in the center was adversely affected last winter and the effects remain visible even now. Mr. Levin agreed that salt can accumulate on brick. Mr. Pato also praised the Committee's work, saying the effort has raised community interest and passion. The Board has received thousands of emails on the subject. He asked that the names of certain individuals not on the Committee list but nonetheless deeply involved be included on subsequent reports. Mr. Pato added that he was sensitive to the total cost of the project, as are many members of the public. The scope of the project and the choice of materials both have significant impact and Mr. Pato said he wants to see the cost analysis and what accommodations the Committee might suggest. Mr. Levin said the assumption is that the project will be done in phases and this will stagger costs. Some of the deteriorated areas would be priorities but others can wait for a later time. He said the Selectmen would make final decisions such as how far down Massachusetts Ave. toward Woburn St. to carry the brick and added that the Committee does not have the resources to do either a full cost analysis or a full life-cycle analysis. Some members of the Committee have expertise in construction management and landscape architecture but the level of detail needed to answer Mr. Pato's questions will require hiring a consultant. Ms. Shadley said that the goal of the Committee is to provide recommendations that will create a continuity of streetscape through the center of town but there is more than one way to accomplish the goal. As the work of the Committee continues, areas identified as critical for brick treatment can be refined. Mr. Cohen said it had come to the attention of the Selectmen that the Committee has set up sub- committees with some participants who have not been vetted, sworn in, or asked to complete ethics training as required by the State. These additional people have made great contributions but the Selectmen must approve and appoint members as process dictates. Mr. Cohen offered to provide counsel to the Committee on what steps should be followed. Mr. Levin welcomed Mr. Cohen's assistance. 70-39 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Ms. Barry added her commendation on the Committee's work and, naming the full list of members, she said she was delighted to learn how collaboratively members have worked together to improve this very important aspect of the town. Ms. Buckley asked that a member of the Council on Aging be invited to join the Committee. Ms. Barry said she would discuss this with Mr. Levin after the meeting. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to receive the Tier 1 Report of the Ad hoc Center Streetscape Committee. Selectmen Committee Appointments At this time of year, the Selectmen re-appoint current sitting members of Town boards and committees to serve for another term. To that end, the extensive list of reappointments included in the meeting materials was acknowledged. On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to reappoint the listed individuals to committees and boards as indicated. Consent Agenda _ Water& Sewer Commitments and Adjustments On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the following Water and Sewer Commitments and Adjustments: Water& Sewer Commitments -- August 2016 Cycle 9 $460,122.57 Water& Sewer Commitments -- August 2016 Final Bills $38,355.69 Water& Sewer Commitments May 2016 Final Bills $4,660.28 Adjustments to Water& Sewer/WSAB meeting 8/4/16 ($33,221.97) Approve One-Day Liquor License—Wildflower Camp Foundation On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve a one- day liquor license to serve beer and wine at the Wildflower Camp Foundation's "Hank Wonder Benefit Concert" to take place at Battin Hall in Cary Memorial Building, on Saturday, October 22, 2016 from 6 p.m. until 10 p.m. Approve One-Day Liquor License—Spectacle Management On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve a one- day liquor license request from Spectacle Management to sell beer and wine in the lobby of the Cary Memorial Building on Thursday, October 6, 2016 from 6:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. (Manhattan Transfer/Take 6 Concert) and on Friday, October 21, 2016 from 7 p.m. until 1 1p.m (Art Garfunkel Concert.) 70-40 Selectmen's Meeting— September 26, 2016 Liquor License ChangeLexington Golf Club On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve a change of management request from the Lexington Golf Club following minor document updates as requested by the ABCC. Approve Minutes and Executive Session Minutes On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the minutes of July 14, 2016 and July 25, 2016, and further to approve and not release the Executive Session minutes of July 14, 2016 and July 25, 2016. Use of the Battle Green—Lexington Minute Men Company Change of Command Ceremony On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the use of the Battle Green by the Lexington Minutemen for a change of command ceremony on Sunday, October 2, 2016 from 2 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. with cannon fire, as permitted by the Fire Department, and the use of traffic cones or barriers to reserve two spaces along the Green on Bedford Road closest to Harrington. Adjournment On motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to adjourn at 10:32 p.m. DOCUMENTS PRESENTED: Proposed FY2017 Water/Sewer Rates A true record; Attest: Kim Siebert Recording Secretary AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approve Tax Bill Inserts PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Consent Agenda C.3 SUMMARY: 1) Lexington Business Directory:Inserted in envelopes addressed to those that pay personal property tax on a business (approx. 900) 2) Visitor Center:Inserted in allproperty tax bills. 3) The REV:Inserted in all property tax bills. SUGGESTED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda. FOLLOW-UP: Economic Development Office DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approve One-Day Liquor License-Lexington Historical Society PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzanne Barry, Chairman C.4 SUMMARY: The Lexington Historical Society is seeking approval for a One-Day Liquor License for the purpose of a Conservation Evening Fundraiser at Lexington Depot. on March 23, 2017 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. SUGGESTED MOTION: Motion to approve the consent agenda. FOLLOW-UP: Selectmen's Office DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D Onolhy ("'over Mom) ?O (P Paid$25.00 Chk#2771 MOR TOWN OF LEXINGTON �D SELECTMEN'S OFFICE a`1 APRIL 191" 1 MAR 6 2017 t xrn61 APPLICATION FOR ONE-DAY LIQUOR LICENSESELECTMEN The Board of Selectmen issues one-day liquor licenses to for-profit and non-profit organizations that serve liquor and charge either a cover charge or for each drink. Please fill in this form completely and return to the Selectmen's Office along with a check for $25.00 made payable to the Town of Lexington. BUSINESS/FUNDRAISING ORGANIZATION: ��Ph�� �r17 AsYV)17cW S ue _ y _ CONTACT NAME AND NUMBER ADDRESS FOR MAILING: � C u6i EMAIL ADDRESS: , r (prxin 9�vh 1 .o,.n TITLE/PURPOSE OF EVENT: ��nrti�` E-�Oel�ti — 6r LOCATION AND ADDRESS: DATE OF FUNCTION: 3A3 f j 7 TIMES OF FUNCTION: C . K Y" TYPE OF LIQUOR TO BE SERVED: DATE AND TIME WHEN LIQUOR DELIVERED: DATE AND TIME WHEN LIQUOR REMOVED: q ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Authorized Signature Federal Identification No. or Social Security Number AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Use of the Battle Green- Historical Society-Battle Re-Enactment PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Suzanne Barry, Chair C.5 SUMMARY: The Historical Society has requested permission to use the Battle Green on April 19, 2017 for an annual children's Battle Reenactment from 10:00 a.m. to 11.15 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. SUGGESTED MOTION: Motion to approve the consent agenda. FOLLOW-UP: Selectmen's Office DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 ATTACHMENTS: Description Type D VfistorriudSociety Battka Ro ksur.actim it Backup Matorrinl TOWN OF LEXINGTON SELECTMEN'S OFFICE APPLICATION FOR APRIL# :s BATTLE GREEN PERMIT C�Xrxc��f The Board of Selectmen issues permits for the use of the Battle Green(see attached regulations). Please fill in this form completely and return to the Selectmen's Office no less than two weeks prior to the requested date. NAME, PHONE NUMBER, and EMAIL ADDRESS OF A RESPONSIBLE CONTACT: I<cth tir\ c kC1,,��rn w, DATE AND TIME OF EVENT: A p r; I (c{ I f3 1? i©:� R,- 1:(tS pM NATURE OF EVENT: &,Njt __ . 1 - E��XC�(,,P<�,ECTED NUMBER OF PARTICIPANrTS, SPECTATORS, AND VEHICLES: _ u- �/Cl12cn � f IN ��SSICnS (n l'SC�. rQ SSUr�/ DURATION OF EVENT: STATEMENT OF EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES TO BE USED: �a�a cic,ln�21 MhSAtks ik GE 1 ClSelk Gf/ SECTION OF THE GREEN DESIRED: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: +"1c��. o� �►�� i�}� �e Leynlon Mintikc VIC,\ 1� �e c15Si}Yl�r 1'7ISJJr1Cq' �OCiCP.� (n�T� 1 earn . /44 Authorized Signature Federal Identification No. or Social Security Number Battle of Lexington Re-enactment(Child version) April 19ih, 2016 (Rain Date- ApriI 20th) Participating Organizations: Lexington Historical Society(Chris Kauffman, Lexington Minute Men (Jaime Lee), His Majesty's 10`h Regiment of Foot (Paul O'Shaughnessy), Lexington Visitor Center(Maureen Rynn) Overview: As part of the Historical Society's ongoing effort to provide entertaining and educational programming for families, the Society is proposing to hold a battle re-enactment that will be performed by children during the April School vacation week. The event will serve to not only educate the public about the important events that occurred on the Battle Green, but will also serve to introduce the public to the variety of organizations that are involved with promoting the important history that occurred on this spot on April 19"'. 1775. Age Range: I" Grade- 8`h Grade Maximum Participants: 40 per session Outline of Events: • Session 1: 10:00 am- 11:15 am 0 10:00- 10:20: Participants arrive and register. ■ Some registration might be able to be done prior to the event date • Chris will have a sign-up table at the Battle Re-enactment Dress Rehearsal c 10:20- 10:30: Participants are sorted into two camps (Minutemen or Regulars) ■ Participants will be given either red or blue sashes in order to differentiate between the two sides. e 10:30- 11:00 Participants drill with their assigned sides ■ Militia Group- Will train and drill to the left side of Buckman "Tavern • Once the group is deemed ready, they will head to Buckman Tavern and wait for the sign that the British are ready. • British Regular Group- Will train on the Visitor Center lawn o 11:00-11:15: Participants re-enact the battle followed by free interaction with the re-enactors. Refreshments at the Visitor Center after the Battle has been completed. ■ To start the Battle,the Militia group will exit Buckman Tavern and cross over to the Common to await the arrival of the Regulars • The Regulars will cross over to the Common and proceed to engage the Militia. • Session 2: 12:30 pm- 1:45 pm 12;30- 12:50: Participants arrive and register. ■ Some relgistration might be able to be done prior to the event date • Chris N ill have a sign-up table at the Battle Re-enactment Dress Rehearsal 12:-0- 1:00: Participants are sorted into t\vo camps (Minutemen or Regulars) Participants will be given either red or blue sashes in order to differentiate between the two sides. 0 1:00- 1:30 Participants drill with their assigned sides ■ Militia Group- Will train and drill to the left side of Buckman Tavern • Once the group is deemed ready, they will head to Buckman Tavern and wait for the sion that the British are ready. ■ British Regular Group- Will train on the Visitor Center lawn 0 1:30-1:1-5: Participants re-enact the battle followed by free interaction with the re-enactors. Refreshments at the Visitor Center after the Battle has been completed. ■ To start the Battle. the Militia group will exit Buckman Tavern and cross over to the Common to await the arrival of the Regulars ■ The Regulars will cross over to the Common and proceed to engage the Militia. Organizational Requirements: Lexin--ton Historical Society: The Society will provide the overall organization of the event and will handle the registration aspect of the event. The Society will handle all Publicity and marketing of the event. The Society will also provide colored sashes or that will be used to differentiate between the two sides. The Society will also provide some wooden training muskets (we have around 20-25 muskets). Lexington Minute Men: It is hoped that the Minute Men will be able to provide a few re enactors to serve as the instructors for the Militia group of children. If possible,provide a supply of Nvooden muskets_ His Majesty's I oth Regiment of Foot: It is hoped that the Tenth will be able to provide a few re-enactors to serve as the instructors for the British Regular Group of children. If possible. provide a supply of wooden muskets. Lexington Visitor Center: It is hoped that the Visitor Center will allow the lawn out front to be used by the Regular group as their training grounds for the event. After the reenactment, refreshments could be served on the lawn as well. The Visitor Center might also consider selling a"Recruit" package consisting of a musket, powder horn, hat andv training boot: (Great idea by Maureen!!!). AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Exemption 3: Collective Bargaining Update - Crossing Guard Union(15 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Carl F. Valente, Town Manager ES.1 SUMMARY: Suggested motion for Executive Session: Move to go into Executive Session to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining related to the Crossing Guards Union and to reconvene in Open Session only to adjourn. Further, the Chairman declares that an open meeting discussion may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the Town. Update on proposed settlement. SUGGESTED MOTION: Not at this time. FOLLOW-UP: TMO DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:40 p.m. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LEXINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Exemption 6: Purchase of Real Estate - Community Center Parking Lot and Adjacent Land (15 min.) PRESENTER: ITEM NUMBER: Carl F. Valente, Town Manager ES.2 SUMMARY: Suggested motion for Executive Session: Move that the Board go into Executive Session to consider the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property, Community Center-Adjacent Parking Lot and Land, and to reconvene in Open Session only to adjourn. Further, that as Chairman, I declare that an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the Town. Update on purchase land adjacent to the Community Center from the Scottish Rite. SUGGESTED MOTION: Not at this time. FOLLOW-UP: TMO DATE AND APPROXIMATE TIME ON AGENDA: 3/13/2017 8:55 p.m.