Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE-2018 ATM <br /> Article 22: Appropriate for Visitors Center <br /> Funds Requested Funding Source Committee Recommendation <br /> $200,000 Free cash <br /> $4,375,000 GF debt Approve (8-1) <br /> $4,575,000 <br /> This article requests the appropriation of $4,575,000 to fund production of construction documents <br /> ($200,000), demolition, of the current building, the construction of a new Visitors Center ($4,300,000 <br /> including demolition), and the temporary relocation of the Visitors Center to a nearby home during the <br /> reconstruction($75,000). The new building would replace the current building at the current location. <br /> The current Visitors Center building was constructed more than 50 years ago. It was designed to provide <br /> rest rooms and information for tourists coming to commemorate the bicentennial of the Battle of Lexing- <br /> ton in 1975. The annual number of visitors has grown by about a factor of two since 1975; approximately <br /> 122,000 visitors entered the building in 2017. <br /> The building is not fully handicapped accessible, lacks adequate restroom facilities for use by tourists and <br /> Minuteman Bikeway users, is inadequate for accommodating the volume of visitors, and lacks the tech- <br /> nology on which visitors now depend. <br /> When it first opened, the Visitors Center was operated by the Chamber of Commerce. Since 2016, it has <br /> been operated and staffed by the Town's Economic Development Office. Sales revenue from the gift <br /> shop, $210,182 in FY2017 and $117,233 in the first half of FY2018, is sufficient to cover the Visitors <br /> Center's operating costs. <br /> In October 2011, a new Visitors Center was added to the Town's five-year capital plan. A programmatic <br /> report was produced in 2012, and then revised in 2013. At the 2014 Annual Town Meeting, $220,608 was <br /> appropriated for design development. The plan at that time was to renovate or rebuild the existing Visitors <br /> Center building to include space for visitor education, tour groups, a self-service kiosk, counter space for <br /> assisting visitors, a veterans' display with visual connection to exterior memorials, retail space, food <br /> vending area,new rest rooms, and office space as well as community meeting space. <br /> Mills Whitaker Architects LLC was hired and guided the process further. In view of the condition of the <br /> present building, of the new programmatic needs, and of conceptual plans provided by Mills Whitaker in <br /> 2015, stakeholders and the Selectmen decided to pursue construction of a new building rather than reno- <br /> vation. <br /> An article for the construction of a new Visitors Center was included in the 2016 Annual Town Meeting <br /> Warrant but was indefinitely postponed. In June 2016, Mills Whitaker provided to the Selectmen a re- <br /> vised estimate of the sum of design and construction costs for a new building of$4,063,675. In view of <br /> the high cost,the Selectmen declined a request by the Tourism Committee to include an article in the war- <br /> rant for the 2017 Annual Town Meeting seeking an appropriation for 25% design funding. The Tourism <br /> Committee then placed a citizen article on that warrant. That article, Article 18, seeking appropriation of <br /> $21,000 to add to the $130,000 remaining from prior appropriations for additional schematic design <br /> funds, was approved. The resulting plan, made available via a report presented to the Permanent Building <br /> Committee on September 4, 2017, was Mills Whitaker's attempt to address the shortcomings of the prior <br /> design. <br /> In October 2017, at Special Town Meeting 2017-3, $150,000 was appropriated under Article 3 to com- <br /> plete the design development of the Mills Whitaker concept. Based on a review of programmatic goals <br /> and feedback obtained through a series of meetings among the Tourism and Permanent Building Commit- <br /> tees, staff, and community stakeholders, this review resulted in a concept for a building smaller than that <br /> originally proposed but one that is larger than the current building. The additional space would provide <br /> 45 <br />