Laserfiche WebLink
July 10, 1975 (continued) -2 <br />abutters and abutters of abutters must be notified, the regular fee will be <br />charged plus 20 x 75 cents or $15 for the notifications over 20." (D.E.N. quote) <br />Action on above: Fees for mailing to abutters, etc. approved by Board. The <br />statement above will be submitted to Town Counsel. <br />Petitioner D. M. Gill, 66 Spring St. (see June 19, 1975) made the following <br />request by letter. A copy of the letter below. <br />July 8, 1975 <br />Dear Mr. Nickerson, <br />I had supposed, perhaps too innocently, that there would be no problem over <br />my appeal to maintain my garage too close to the lot line, for the town has clearly <br />'allowed' the garage to remain in place for nearly 30 years. The vote to deny <br />seems to have placed me in a worse position than if I had not appealed, for it may <br />make it more difficult to convince a potential buyer that the garage is not at risk: <br />the precise reverse of my intentions. <br />I understand from our telephone conversation, and from the report in the Minute- <br />man of the board's deliberations, that it was in no way your intention to make diffi- <br />culties for me. This, however, does not come over in the notice of your decision. I <br />wonder, therefore, if you would be prepared to give me some document, possibly a <br />letter, which explained your meaning more fully? I would be particularly grateful if <br />you could find words forceful enough to convince a purchaser, his lawyer and his bank, <br />that there is no substantial risk of my garage being ordered removed and that the <br />town is content to have it remain standing indefinitely. <br />I thank you, <br />/s/ D. Michael Gill <br />Formal action re. letter to D.M. Gill was put off until the next scheduled <br />hearing night, July 24, 1975, when hopefully regular members would be in attendance. <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. <br />1 <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Evelyn F. Cole, Secretary/Clerk <br />