Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Lexington Housing Realty Trust Hearing (continued) <br />Chairman: You have 5 minutes. <br />BRIEF IN OPPOSITION presented to the Board by Mr. Goldstein. (10 pages) <br />Mr. Goldstein: First the general objections from the neighbors expressing <br />their sentiments in opposition and I think the Board should naturally take <br />into consideration the sentiments of the Town. You have letters, you've <br />heard from other members of Boards in Town, you've heard from the Building <br />Inspector and the Planning Board and according to statute, Section 21 of 40B, <br />Chapter 774, you are required to take into consideration those letters and <br />the opinions of the other Boards of the Town. <br />Briefly, Chapter 774 does state that the Town should have minimum requirements <br />for low and moderate income housing. Perhaps the Town doesn't meet the re- <br />quirements at this time, although there's a balance involved here. It's not <br />just a carte blanche for a developer to come in with any plan and say you <br />don't have your minimum requirements so you've got to build this, because I'm <br />petitioning you. He's got to meet certain requirements. <br />It has to be consistent with the local needs. And I submit to you that the <br />proposal that has been presented to you even in its recently amended form <br />does not conform and is not consistent with local needs. Obviously we have <br />got a little problem here and some of the Board members see it and it comes <br />across with some of their questions as to some of the information lacking as <br />to what this will be and we'll take Mr. Ostroff at his word that if he's <br />going to ever build this he'll give us some of the information at sometime. <br />Now, what is consistent with local needs? How do we go about defining this <br />term and to see whether or not the construction which is proposed will comply <br />with that definition which is the definition that this Board must find fits <br />the proposal if they are to allow the proposal. Well, the statute does spell <br />it out and the Supreme Judicial Court in the case which Mr. Ostroff wanted to <br />site does also define what is this to do with local needs. Now, consistent <br />with local needs standards requires that both the Board and the committee, if <br />it should be appealed, balance the regional need for low and moderate income <br />housing against any objections to the details of the proposal. <br />-9 <br />Before you, you have 200 names and you have many people here tonight and I'm <br />sure you realize there are many objections to this proposal. Now, also to the <br />objections you have to balance with this critera. I'm quoting from the case <br />of the Board of Appeals of Hanover vs. the Housing Appeals Commission which <br />is, for the record, in 294 N.E. 2d, pages 412 and 413, the factors to be con- <br />sidered "to protect the health or safety of the occupants of the proposed <br />housing and of the residents of Lexington. This, Mrs. Herscott has mentioned. <br />There are no sidewalks in the area. There's going to be a lot more children. <br />There's a lot of traffic right on Woburn St., and it's one of the major arteries <br />and Lowell St. is the other boundary of this whole neighborhood and Young St. <br />and Webb St. constitute an increasingly popular shortcut at the rush hour to <br />avoid the lights at the corner of Woburn St. and Lowell St. I think that if <br />the Fire Department were here that they might have some objection to cars being <br />parked on the proposed Dunham St. parking area, on the half of it, referred to <br />by Mr. Ostroff. I don't know from these plans. It's difficult to tell, gazing <br />upon them from here, and assuming that they are drawn to scale. I don't think <br />they can get down that street now and make any kind of turn. <br />