Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Housing Realty Trust Hearing (continued) <br />-3 <br />The buildings will be of concrete block faced with red brick. He explained <br />the windows as 116 over 6". It is proposed that the roof be copper clad. The <br />exterior will be similar to the Masonic buildings at Marrett Road and Massachu- <br />setts Avenue except that his proposal will have peaked roofs, he said. The plan <br />calls for 12.2 homes per acre. He compared the proposal with RM allowing 12 <br />units per acre and RH allowing 18 units per acre of subsidized. <br />Mr. Ostroff's units are proposed to be financed by MHFA. The guidelines <br />for selection of the 11 families, 25% of the 44 units, will be based on the <br />adjusted income and the number of persons in a family and will be according to <br />MHFA standards. The balance will be at market value of the rental units pres- <br />ently in Lexington. The 11 units will rent for approximately $210 per unit <br />with all utilities except telephone and 33 will be at market value, $360 to <br />$365 per unit with all utilities except telephone. <br />With reference to transportation to schools he stated that schools and <br />transportation are within close proximity to this area. Some are 3/4 mile and <br />the farthesfare 1� miles, he stated. Junior and Senior Highs are within walk- <br />ing distance. <br />The management will be given to a company with experience in that field or <br />with proven experience. Preference will be given to a local management company. <br />Mr. Ostroff stated that he believes it will be an assist in satisfying <br />' local housing needs and regional needs. It will be visibly attractive, compat- <br />ible with single family development in the neighborhood both in relation to mass <br />and scale. It will be sensitive to the environment. It will have a minimal <br />impact on the neighborhood. It will be on a site suitable for development, <br />have adequate municipal services immediately available and have adequate open <br />space under municipal control to serve the needs of the occupants. The designer <br />is with me this evening and if he can be of assistance he will answer any <br />questions within his province. If there are any questions I'll certainly try <br />to answer them. He ended his presentation by saying that he thanks the Board <br />for hearing him out. <br />'On the Chairman's question as to whether he had talked with the Conserva- <br />tion Commission, Mr. Ostroff responded that he was very much aware that they <br />had to comply with the Wetland Protections Act. <br />Mr. Ostroff stated that he had filed with the Massachusetts Agency with <br />reference to the Environmental Impact. <br />Mr. Reed questioned whether a comprehensive permit meant he would not need <br />to go before the Conservation Commission. <br />Mr. Sheldon stated that Chapter 774 gives the Board of Appeals a great <br />deal of authority, but Conservation is not in our approval. <br />Mr. Cataldo asked if any variances from the building code were being <br />considered. Mr. Ostroff said that the only variance required was for side <br />yard. <br />Mr. Cataldo; I understand that you have rentals for $210 per month. What if a <br />family has 6 children and there's income of only $100 ? <br />