|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1974-05-21
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
1974-05-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:53:10 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:31:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lexington Housing Realty Trust Hearing (continued) -16 <br />' the area includes grasses and mosses of the types found in swamps and normally <br />wet lands. Children playing in the area have learned to avoid playing in sev- <br />eral of these sections because of the normally wet areas. If the members of <br />the Board have not visited the site, I would recommend such a visit. I would <br />also suggest communicating with the Conservation Commission regarding the pos- <br />sibility that a wetland hearing may be necessary. Development of this section <br />may result in sufficient changes in the natural drainage and water storage in <br />the area that nearby residences may subsequently encounter flooding in their <br />basements, as has occurred in similar areas. <br />The impact of a development of the type proposed would be substantial, <br />and it would be deleterious to the immediate neighborhood and to the Town. <br />Many people in the neighborhood have expressed apprehension, principally <br />because the petitioner's plans have been so gross, and at the same time so <br />incomplete. The petitioner appears to be requesting a Carte Blanche to <br />develop as he wishes, with details to be worked out as he proceeds. <br />As an interested citizen, and a Town Meeting Member from Precinct 5, <br />within which the subject land lies, I have addressed the petition as submitted. <br />I regret my inability to attend the hearing personally, but I respectfully <br />urge the Board to address the petition as filed. If substantive changes are <br />made, so that the petition is no longer as initially filed, I hope to have <br />the opportunity to address these changes. On the basis of the petition, I <br />urge the Board of Appeals to deny Mr. Ostroff's petition. <br />I <br />Sincerely, <br />/s/ Ephraim Weiss <br />Chairman: I'll explain our procedure. What we would normally do is to discuss <br />further the cases we have had tonight and vote on them. Anyone wishing to stay <br />is welcome to do so. But no one may speak or enter into the discussions. <br />Because this case tonight is an important one the Board feels it needs time <br />before arriving at a conclusion. We will meet here one week from tonight and <br />at that time vote on it. <br />William Fraser requested a show of hands -of those in opposition, who did not <br />sign the petition. <br />20 or 21 persons raised hands in opposition to the petition. <br />Mr. Cataldo asked Mrs. Brown if any of the Design Advisory Board had given <br />their recommendations on this proposal. <br />Mrs. Brown stated that their recommendations had been included in the report. <br />The chairman declared the hearing closed at 9:10 P.M. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Evelyn F. Cole, Clerk <br />Board of Appeals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.