|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1973-04-11
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
1973-04-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:53:08 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />SPECIAL MEETING - April 11, 1973 <br />CAMPANELLI, INC. (hearing continued from April 3, 1973) <br />' April 11, 1973 <br />Present: Chairman Nickerson, G. Wadsworth, G. Sheldon, R. Cataldo and L. Clarke. <br />A notice had been posted on the Town Clerk's bulletin board stating that the <br />Board would discuss further the request of Campanelli, Inc. <br />A special meeting was held on April 11, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. to extend <br />the discussion in regard to Campanelli, Inca request for a site plan review <br />for a special permit under Section 13 of the Lexington zoning by-law and <br />for a finding and determination on a proposed facility for Tyco Laboratories, <br />Inc. at 4 Hartwell Place, in accordance with plans submitted; that the pro- <br />posed construction will constitute a suitable development, and will not re- <br />sult in substantial detriment to the neighborhood. Land presently owned by <br />Hartwell Realty is under purchase and sale agreement with Campanelli. <br />An effort had been made by the chairman to have the petition withdrawn <br />at the hearing of April 3 because a letter dated that day from the Planning <br />Board stated that a new drainage plan had been presented to it last Friday, <br />March 30, to revise the original unsatisfactory one. Neither the Planning <br />Board nor the Engineering Department had time to review it adequately. The <br />Planning Board letter stated that it "cannot recommend at this time that <br />either plan be granted approval by your board". The chairman pointed out <br />that the Planning Board had thirty days from the original submission of <br />drawings on March 8th in which to make final recommendations and that <br />there were still four days left. He therefore, recommended that the peti- <br />tion be withdrawn for future resubmission. <br />The petitioner felt that the loss of time involved would be ruinous to <br />him as Tyco Laboratories must vacate its three leased buildings in Waltham <br />by September 30th, a deadline which had already been extended from July 31st. <br />At the April 3 meeting Bertram L. Wilcox of Campanelli, Inc. introduced <br />Robert Raymond, Site Engineer, of Bradford Saivetz & Associates, Inc.; <br />Richard Rock of Edgar H. Wood & Associates, Inc., the Architects; and Edward <br />M. Colbert, Division General Manager of Tyco Instrument Division. They col- <br />lectively rehearsed the fact of their tremendous time problem and requested <br />that no decision be made on their petition until the legal thirty days had <br />expired and hopefully the Planning Board and Engineering Department could <br />report favorably. Mr. Rock presented a rendering of the building which his <br />firm had prepared. The Board of Appeals voted to hold a special meeting on <br />April 11 to extend the discussion and to hear reports from the Planning Board, <br />Engineering Department and Conservation Commission. Purpose of the meeting <br />would be to hopefully render a favorable decision without overriding reports <br />from the above Board, Department and Commission. The Chairman warned that <br />the petitioner would have to handle the matter with the Conservation Commis- <br />sion to satisfy Hatch Act provisions and its impositions. The Board of Appeals <br />will handle notices to the Planning Board and the Engineering Department that <br />their studies must be completed and the results available by April 11 and hope- <br />fully by April 7th, the thirty day limit for report. Nobody spoke in favor nor <br />in opposition at this April 3rd meeting. Letters were received from the Plan- <br />ning Board and advice from the Engineering Department indicating lack of time <br />for sufficient study; a letter from the Conservation Commission was received, <br />and a letter from the Board of Health making recommendations regarding sanitary <br />sewage disposal, public water supplies, and air pollution and that flood con- <br />trol be approved by the Conservation Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.