|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1966-05-10
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1966
>
1966-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hearing - John & Rosina Busa <br />May 10, 1966 <br />' Mr. Nickerson read the notice as it had appeared in the April 21 <br />and 28 issues of the Lexington Minute -man, and then asked the petitioner <br />to present his petition. <br />Mrs. Shirley Bayle, attorney representing John and Rosina Busa, <br />spoke as follows: <br />I am sure the Board is familiar with this petition and I notice you have <br />been acting on this problem since 1962. The last action was in April <br />of this year after the permit, which was granted for two years, had <br />expired. Therefore when the permit was denied the petitioners brought <br />this new application for a new permit. This farm has been operating <br />for many years, the stand since 1962. I would like to present the signa- <br />tures of 70 neighbors, representing 50 families, who have signed this <br />petition wishing to be recorded in favor of John and Rosina Busa oper- <br />ating a stand on the premises at 52 Lowell St. on the ground that public <br />convenience and welfare will be.substantially served by granting the <br />permission requested and that the requested permit will not tend to im- <br />pair the status of the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Nickerson: This is a repetition of the petition we have had for <br />several years as you have stated. We granted it yearly until the By-law <br />was changed and the last time it was granted for two years. We voted to <br />deny it last April on the ground of a number of transgressions of the <br />conditions we imposed which the objectors named very specifically. If <br />we grant the petition now as presented, we will undoubtedly impose the <br />same conditions that were imposed before and would expect them to be <br />adhered to. <br />Mrs. Bayle: I would like to point out that the new petition is worded <br />somewhat differently. It doesn't ask for permission to operate from <br />that portion of the packing room. The reason is that before last year <br />this stand was operated by Joseph Busa who is a son of John Buss. He is <br />no longer in the picture and last year John's wife, Rosina, and her <br />brother took over the management of the farm. It is their intention to <br />improve and remodel it as soon as possible and for this reason they are <br />interested in getting rid of the packing room and to get a permit from <br />the Building Inspector to build a new and attractive farm stand, and for <br />this reason I would ask that the permit be not limited to this packing <br />room as it has previously been limited. I believe any new building will <br />be on the same site as the stand is now and it will be at least100ft. <br />from the road since the front is for parking. This would not be dis- <br />turbed. <br />Nickerson: Is this contemplated improvement new construction or is it <br />at all definite? How soon do you hope to apply for a building,permit? <br />' Bayle: As soon as possible. <br />Nickerson: Then it is imminent? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.