Laserfiche WebLink
and certainly a gate across the entrance would be most definitely a <br />detraction from the Common. I might add that I do not stand alone in <br />objecting to this. There are three members of the church who said <br />that if they lived where I do they would feel like I do. <br />Locke: Anyone else? <br />(Two letters were handed to the Board expressing opposition to <br />the proposed parking lot, which the Chairman read to the <br />assembly.) <br />Helen Ryan: I regret the stand that I must take. It is also shared by <br />oWo— ther churches nearby. Harrington Rd. has been made one way on <br />Sunday, and to make an entrance from Harrington Lane does not seem to me <br />to be for the welfare of the public. The parking for the churches on <br />Sunday morning is extremely heavy. There have been 11 reported accidents <br />at this corner in 1954. I also object to the proximity of the parking of <br />cars at the rear of my property which we are trying so hard to preserve. <br />Finally, in opening up this wea for parking it will be used by others and <br />develop into a public parking lot. I am firmly opposed to this petition. <br />Mrs.Michael Morrison: I would like to register my opposition to the pro- <br />posed esta is ment of a parking lot on the premises of 3 Harrington Rd. <br />The parking lot, which would necessitate one, possibly two, entrances or <br />exits on Bedford St. would constitute an additional traffic hazard, and <br />with a young family growing up, I now view the traffic situation on Bed- <br />ford St. with alarm, and to aggravate a bad situation merely to conven- <br />ience a few people seems irresponsible in view of the overall welfare of <br />the town. It would devalue property in the area, and would also be very <br />unattractive viewed from the Battle Green. The present lovely vista of <br />trees,lawn and meadows adds to the beauty of our historical shrine and <br />any step which would spoil that should be viewed with considerable cau- <br />tion. The statement has been made that this lot would only be used on <br />Sunday for two hours. I think that with all the functions going on at the <br />church and the financial investment made to establish this lot, if this <br />request were granted, this plan would soon be amended to the point where <br />all persons using the church would be extended parking privileges also. <br />It would provide further incentive for other societies to broach similar <br />proposals. It is hoped that the Board will consider these objections <br />seriously. <br />(A telegram was received by the Board in favor of granting <br />the application - and was read to the assembly by the Chairman) <br />Locke; Anyone else in opposition? <br />Frank H. Tobin: I am opposed. <br />C <br />Helen Ryan: I am opposed. I would like to say further that I think that <br />t ei`decision of the Board of Appeals should most naturally reflect pre- <br />vious decisions that the Town has made in regard to changing the various <br />zoning areas in the Town. A year ago at a Town Meeting a very consider- ' <br />able vote was recorded, and the Town Meeting recorded itself as being <br />overwhelmingly in opposition to any further encroachment to the Battle <br />