|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1947-01-03
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1940-1949
>
1947
>
1947-01-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
238 <br />Mr. Sidney A. Maxwsll, 341 Wood Street= I feel <br />, <br />as Mr. Smith does, that we have a building.up there that <br />I think something should be done with. I don't think <br />it would be wasted and I feel that this type of work <br />would without a question of doubt fit into the general <br />layout better than anything else that possibly could go <br />out there. <br />There is one thing I would like to bring out and <br />that is that you can't even see any part of the plant <br />even at this time of the year with the leaves all off. <br />Unless they put up a sign no one will even know that <br />there are up there. As a taxpayer in the town, I <br />think here is a chance of the town to bring in additional <br />revenue. I feel in this way we would be getting a <br />lot more out of it than if it were converted into a <br />poultry business or some other farm producing program <br />which, of course, he can do without any permit. Our <br />own company does a tremendous amount of research work <br />in our plant which is in the heart of the residential <br />area in St. Louis. We live in peace with the residents <br />nearby our laboratory and research plants. I. as <br />one of the closest neighbors, have absolutely no <br />objection and am very much in favor. <br />Mrs. Jessie Barker, 201 Wood Street; We own the <br />property directly across from the hill. I see no reason <br />why that it would make any difference. I think the class <br />Of people that it would bring would be very desirable. <br />Mrs. Daudelin, 275 Wood Street; Mr. Daudelin and <br />I would be very happy to have such a use made of that <br />building and pleased to have that type of work done there. <br />Mr. Locke; Usually in granting a variation of the <br />Zoning the town's interests naturally should, be pro- <br />tected.` Often times limitations as to length of use, <br />type of use, are made a part of the granting of the <br />petition. The town's interests must be protected <br />so that no different use should at some future date be <br />made of a building of this sort. I assume that Dewey <br />& Almy wi11 be in business for a great many .years and, <br />if granted, not object to a limitation to the use of this <br />building along the lines you outline. <br />Mr. Lunn; I assume that would be agreeable to us. <br />Mr. Locke; The type of work you do would, of course, <br />be leading to commerical application, but there would <br />be no goods produced on the premises for sale. <br />Mr. Lunn; We vio uld be willing to agree that no <br />substantial amount of goods, other than a sample, <br />would be sold. ' <br />Mr. Redman; Anything brought up there would be <br />stored inside the building, wouldn't it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.