Laserfiche WebLink
58 <br />a <br />BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under the Lexington Zoning <br />' <br />By-law and General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 as <br />amended, having received a wiitten petition addressed to it be <br />Robert Cady a copy of which is hereto annexed, held a public <br />hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to the petitioner <br />and to the owners of all property deemed by the Board to be <br />affected thereby as they appear on the most recent local tax <br />list and also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a news- <br />paper published in LOxibgt6n, `whicl hearing ,washeld in 'the <br />Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building on the 24th <br />day of May, 1946. <br />Five regular members of the Hoard of Appeals were present <br />at the hearing. A certificate of notice is hereto annexed. <br />At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf of the petitioner <br />tending to show: That he wished permission to extend his garage <br />located at 10 Greenwood §treet, Lexington, a distance sideways in <br />the direction of his house, some 10' in order to provide a two - <br />car garage instead of the present siggle garage. The petitioner <br />stated that the addition to the garage would be made of materials <br />similar to the present constPuction. He also stated that he <br />might desire to raise the present garage and addition so*e 2' <br />in order to make the floor of the garage more nearly level with <br />the grade of the street. He stated that the present garage is <br />approximately 10' from the present street line and that the <br />addition would also be 10' from the street line. <br />' <br />No one appeared in opposition to the said addition. <br />At the close. of the hearing the Board in private session <br />on May 24, 1946 gave consideration to the subject of the <br />petition and voted unanimously in favor of the following <br />findings: <br />1. That in its judgment the public convenience and welfare <br />will be substantially served by the making of the exception <br />requested. <br />2. That the exception requested will not tend to impair <br />the status of the neighborhood. <br />3. That the exception requested will be in harmony with the <br />general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lexington <br />Zoning By-law. <br />4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the said <br />parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district in vh ich <br />It is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the <br />Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would <br />invoYve substantial hardship to the petitioner and that desirable <br />relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the ' <br />intent or purpose of such Lexington Zoning By-law. <br />