Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Redman asked if the showroom would be illuminated after <br />nine in the evening and Mr. Viano said that the lighting will <br />be indirect. <br />Mr. Viano stated that the building would be heated by <br />gas, and thus any soot from soft coal would be eliminted. <br />Mr. itarry Boyd, 30 Bedford Street said that the w&11 <br />at the present time is built nearly up to his living room <br />window. He said that the wall cuts out absolutely*the light <br />on all of the first floor windown; one window on the stair- <br />way going from the first to the second floor and from the <br />pantry one will look out on a blank wall four feet away. <br />He said that the projecting portion of the proposed addition <br />does project beyond the front of his house approximately <br />four feet. <br />The Chairman asked if he would object to the addition <br />provided the part which projects out from his house was not <br />there and Mr. Boyd said that he would feel a whole lot better a <br />about it, but it would still cut out most of the light. <br />The Chairman asked if the salesroom was his real object- <br />ion and Mr. Boyd replied in the affirmative. He said that it <br />is the blank wall in front of his windows that bothers him. <br />Mr. Nickerson asked how much land Mr. Boyd owned on the <br />other side of his house and he said that he has a.751 frontage <br />and approximately 35 or 40 feet on the other side. He said <br />that his house was built before the Zoning haws came into . <br />effect. He said that his chief objections was the matter of <br />shutting out light and air. <br />Mr. Britton said that he would like to see Mr. Viano <br />make the best use of the property and wondered if he would <br />be willing to set the addition back anft give Mr. Boyd the <br />light he desires. He said that he thought some compromise <br />could be made. <br />Mr. Viano said that he realized fully that it is unfort- <br />unate that such a situation exists.0fle said that he is con- <br />scious of the fact that it is inconvenient and disagreeable <br />to Mr. Boyd. He said that it is inevitable that if he had <br />sold the property something much more undesirable could have <br />been erected. He said that he has been approached several <br />times but pupposely refused to sell the property because <br />he desired to control the construction that went there. <br />Mr. Viano said that he had Mr. Boyd approached by a real <br />estate man, knowing what was contemplated, to see if he could <br />arrange to purchase the property. He said that nothing could <br />be done on that particular phase of it. Mr. Viano said that <br />as for redesigning the construction, it would be out of the <br />question. The building has gone too far, involving consider- <br />able expense. He said that the best way out of the dilemma <br />is the relocation of the Boyd house and not the relocation of <br />the building. Mr. Viano said that the relocation of the <br />building might give Mr. Boyd a little relief but it would not <br />* from his cellar, it cuts out <br />** He said that it is not his fault that the house is so <br />close to the line. <br />1 <br />7 <br />1 <br />