Laserfiche WebLink
EVI <br />� ;ff. <br />' hereto annexed, held a public hearing thereon of which notice <br />was mailed to the petitioner and to the awners of all propbrty <br />deemed by the Board to be affected thereby as they appear on <br />the most recent local tax list and also advertised in the Lex- <br />ington Minute -Man, a newspaper published in Lexington, which <br />hearing was held in the Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office <br />Building on the bOth day of May, 1946. <br />Four regular and one associate members of the Board of <br />Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of notice is <br />hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf <br />of the petitioner tending to show: That permission was desired <br />for the construction of a store and locker building at the <br />corner of Lincoln Street and Marrett Road on the property owned <br />byMinute Man Foods, Inc.. It was stated that this building would <br />have the required 20' setback required under the Zoning Law; <br />that the building would be of second-class construction; that <br />they wished to peparate a retail store and sell frozen foods to.: <br />the public and also to those who wished to store the fold in <br />lockers provided in the building. It was stated that a maximum <br />of five persons would be employed in this building at any time; that <br />the building and store would be open six days a week from 8:00 a.m. <br />to 6.00 pram, except on Fridays at which time the store would be <br />.open until 9:00 p.m. It was stated that an indirect illuminated <br />sign would be installed in the front of the building and that the sign <br />would be illuminated only during the hours the store is open. <br />It was also stated that a paved black tar surface would be <br />provided for parking purposes at the front bf the building.> <br />Two people -.appeared in favor of the petition. No one appeared <br />against the petition. <br />At the close of the hearing the Board in private session <br />May 10, 1946 gave consideration to thb subject of the petition <br />and voted unanimously in favor of the following findings: <br />1. That in its judgment the public convenience and welfare <br />will be substantially served by the making of the exception <br />requested. <br />2. That the exception requested will not tend to impair <br />the statue of the neighborhood. <br />3. That the exception requested will be in harmony with the <br />general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lexington <br />Zoning By-law. <br />4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the said <br />parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district in which <br />it is located, a litbral enforcement of the provisions of the <br />Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would involve <br />