1946-03-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

and voted unanimously in favor of the following findings: 1. That in its j_u.dgmeat`the public convenience and welfare will not be substantially served by the making of the exception requested. 2. That the exception requested will tend to impair the status of the neighborhood. 3. That the exception requested will not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lexington Zoning By-law. 4. That the enforcement of the Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would not involve practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship and the relief requested may not be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without sub- stantially derogating from the intent and purpose of such Lex- ington Zoning By-law. Pursuant to the said findings, the Board hereby denies the said petition of Peter Helburn on the grounds that as the petitioner seeks to establish a business, that is in a residential zone, under the Zoning Laws, the Board of Appeals had not the power br authority to grant said petition. The Board hereby makes a detailed record of all its proceedings relative to such petition and hereby sets forth that the reasons for its decision are its findings hereinbefore set fvrhh and the testimony presented at the said hearing, including that herein summar- ized, and directs that this record immediately following this decision shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk of Lexington and shall be a public record and that notice of this decision shall be mailed forthwith to each party in interest. BOARD OF APPEALS OF LEXINGTON (Acting under the Lexington Zoning By-law and General Laws) Winthrop H. Bowker Errol H. Locke J. Milton Brown D. E. Nickerson Lester T. Redman I, Hazel J. Jurray, Clerk of the Board of Appeals of Lexington, appointed under General �aws, Chahat sente 40 f5ections e cer i to 30 s _ amenondthehereby l4th daycertify February, 1946ytoaEdith W. Willarde JaackaH. g • • •