Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />0 <br />Mr. Harry Palladino said that he owned property at <br />267 Nass. Avenue and he wished to be recorded in opposi- <br />tion. He said that this was a well cared for section <br />and the people tried to keep their places looking good and <br />an apartment house might invite less desirable people to <br />the neighborhood. <br />Miss Helen Burke, 314 mass. Avenue, said that she lives <br />with her sister and their house practically faces the build- <br />ing. She strongly objects to granting the petition. <br />Miss Emily Burke also said that she wished to be re- <br />corded in opposition to granting the petition. <br />A gentlemen, who neglected to give his name, asked <br />if the tenants would be permanent or temporary and Mr. <br />Richardson said that they would be permanent. This man <br />said that he believed the majority of fires began in other <br />rooms than kitchens. He also objected 'because of the fact <br />that there might be several cars going in and out which <br />would create a hazard to children in the neighborhood. <br />He said he could not see how twelve apartments could be <br />crowded into the building. <br />Mrs. Blanche Banks said that she owned the pro- <br />perty in back of the Rest Inn and she would not object <br />if the laws were complied with. She said that the build- <br />ing is a fire hazard. <br />14r. Palladino said that if an apartment house were <br />being constructed entirely from the ground, of real first <br />class construction, there might not be any objection, but <br />to out twelve families and equipment into the building, <br />in his opinion would be a strain on the building. <br />Mr. Shine of Mass. Avenue said that he had readsbout <br />the fire in Boston and he thought the same condition would <br />exist in Lexington the moment a building of this construc- <br />tion was allowed. He said that there were fire escapes and <br />some railing around the roof but he did not believe this <br />would take care of twelve families. He said that at the <br />time this building was owned by the bank it was condemned <br />and he wished to be recorded in opposition of granting this <br />petition. <br />Mr. Murphy said that there would be no garage in con- <br />nection with the building. He said that the building was <br />in poor condition but no matter how much it costs or what <br />condition it is left in, it will be a lot better than it <br />looks today. <br />:64 <br />