|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1942-09-04
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1940-1949
>
1942
>
1942-09-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:29:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Md 6 <br />Evidence was offered on behalf of citizens opposing <br />the granting of the said petition tending to show: <br />No evidence was offered opposing the granting of the <br />petition. <br />At the close of the hearing <br />session on September 4, 1942 gave <br />subject of the petition and voted <br />of the following findings; <br />1. That in its judgment the <br />welfare will not be substantially <br />the exception requested. <br />the Board in private <br />consideration to the <br />unanimously in favor <br />public convenience and <br />served by the making of <br />2. That the exception requested will tend to impair <br />the status of the neighborhood. <br />3. That the exception requested will not be in harmony <br />with the general purposes and intent of the regulations in <br />the Lexington Zoning By-law. <br />4. That the enforcement of the Lexington Zoning By-law <br />as to the locus in question would not involve practical <br />difficulty and unnecessary hardship and the relief requested <br />may not be granted without substantial detriment to the <br />public good and without substantially derogating from the <br />intent and purpose of such Lexington Zoning By-law. <br />Pursuant to the said findings, the Board hereby denies <br />the said petition of A. Horace Weene, because such a sub- <br />division as proposed would be contrary to the intent of <br />the Lexington Zoning By-law, in that it would make it possible <br />to establish in practice lot sizes not over one-half as <br />large as those provided for by such by-law, and it would <br />be possible for each such sub -division to be separately <br />transferred at some future time. It would also nullify <br />the by-law provision that on each side of a dwelling or <br />other permitted main structure there shall be provided a <br />side yard of at least 10' in width, which shall be kept <br />open from the front line of the main structure to the <br />rear line thereof. <br />The Board hereby makes a detailed record of all its <br />proceedings relative to such petition and hereby sets forth <br />that the reasons for its decision are its findings herein- <br />before set forth and the testimony presented at the said <br />hearing, including that herein summarized, and directs <br />that this record immediately following this decision shall <br />be filed in the office of the Town Clerk of Lexington and <br />shall be a public record and that notice of this decision <br />shall be mailed forthwith to each party in interest. <br />• <br />is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.