Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
272` <br />occasionally a car parked on Marrett Road to look over ' <br />the produce before driving in or on, but that was all. <br />The Chairman told him to keep the cars off the road. <br />No other persons wishing to behear¢,the hearing was <br />declared closed at 8:22 P. M. Pas. Napoli retired. <br />Upon motion of Mr. Bowker, seconded by Mr. Kimball, <br />it was voted to renew the permit in the following form: <br />BOARD OF APPEALS PERPYZIT <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws, <br />Chapter 40, See. 27, having received a written petition <br />addressed to it by Frank A. Napoli, a copy of which is <br />hereto annexed, held a public hearing thereon of which <br />notice was mailed to the petitioner and to the owners <br />of all property deemed by the Board to be affected there- <br />by as they appear on the most recent local tax list and <br />also advertised in the Lexington Mihute-Man, a newspaper <br />published in Lexington, which hearing was held in the <br />Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building on the 18th <br />day of July, 1941. <br />One Associate and three members of the Board of <br />Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of ' <br />notice is hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was <br />offered on behalf of the petitioner tending to show: <br />That he wished a permit for a period of one year <br />expiring on May 8, 1942 to conduct a roadside stand on <br />property of Frank A. and Mary Napoli located on Marrett <br />Road and Middle Street; that there had been no changes <br />made in connection with the existing roadside stand and <br />that there had been no parking of automobiles on Marrett <br />Road. <br />No evidence was offered in opposition. <br />At the close of the hearing the Board in private <br />session on July 18, 1941 gave consideration to the subject <br />of the petition and voted unanimously in favor of the <br />following findings: <br />1. That in its judgment the public convenience and <br />welfare will be substantially served by the making of the <br />exception requested. <br />2. That the exception requested will not tend to <br />impair the status of the neighborhood. <br />3. That the exception requested will be in harmony <br />with the general purposes and intent of the regulations in <br />the Lexington Zoning By-law. <br />4• That owing to conditions especially affecting the ' <br />said parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district <br />