Laserfiche WebLink
192 <br />ington Zoning Law or in accordance with Chapter 40, ' <br />Section 27A of the General Laws and amendi� nts. <br />The hearing will be held on September 20, 1940, at <br />8:15 P. M. in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Build- <br />ing, Lexington, lass. <br />C. EDWARD GLYNN, <br />Chairman, Board of Appeals <br />Insert: Lexington Minute -lean, Aug. 29th, 1940 <br />Upon motion of Mr. Locke, seconded by Mr. Bowker, <br />it was unanimously voted to grant the petition for the <br />maintenance of the parking space in the following form: <br />BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT <br />The Board of Appeals, acting under General Laws, <br />Chapter 40, Sec. 27, having received a written petition <br />addressed to it by Colonial Garage, Inc. a copy of which <br />is hereto annexed, held a public hearing thereon of which <br />notice was mailed to the petitioner and to the owners of <br />all property deemed by the Board to be affected thereby <br />as they appear on the most recent local tax list and also <br />advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a newspaper publish- <br />ed in Lexington, which hearing was held in the Selectmen's <br />Room, in the Town Office Building on the 20th day of Sep- <br />tember, 1940. <br />Tvio Associates and three members of the Board of <br />Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of <br />notice is hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was <br />offered on behalf of the petitioner tending to show: <br />That he desired to establish a parking space in the <br />rear and side of the proposed building located at 1686- <br />1698 Mass. Ave., as shown on a plan entitled "Store and <br />Office Building at Lexington, R,Iass. for the Colonial <br />Garage, Inc., Eugene J. Viano, Pres. 1940, John Edmund <br />Kelley Architect, 38 Chauncy St., Boston Mass."; that <br />the proposed building would utilize a part of the commer- <br />cial area and that it was their desire to provide parking <br />privileges for the customers of the tenants;that he <br />believed that parking space was a requirement today for <br />the satisfactory rental of business property. <br />Seventeen persons appeared in opposition, stating <br />that in their opinion the use of these premises for park- <br />ing, especially in connection with the bowling alleys would <br />create undue noise and would be a detriment to their well- <br />being, and belief was expressed that this usage was an en- <br />tering wedge to extend the business area at this location. <br />